Einstein-like breakthrough in Climate Science (Part 2)

June 2, 9:44 AMPortland Civil Rights ExaminerDianna Cotter

Previous Next

7 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe

Get alerts when there is a new article from the Portland Civil Rights Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.

Email Address   Include other special offers from Examiner.com Terms of Use

NASA Mar 20, 2007

Yesterdays Article, Einstein-like breakthrough in Climate Science (Part 1), discussed the theory behind Dr.’s Miskolczi “PHYSICS OF THE PLANETARY GREENHOUSE EFFECT” Which states basically that the Earth’s atmosphere is in equilibrium, demonstrated very simply by the fact we have an atmosphere, and CO₂ is irrelevant in changing that equilibrium.

This brings us to a disturbing and very concerning point. If the science behind this is correct, the math has been proven, why is it that the UN and the IPCC refusing to look at the information that has been presented by Dr. Miskolczi and Dr. Zagoni? Why are these theories not being discussed? It is rare to even hear of their existence, let alone any debate about them. Why is it that the Main Stream Media has not announced this brilliant breakthrough to the world?

The answer could not be simpler.

MONEY.

In order for government grants to be given out to institutions in this current government climate, it has to be in the arena of proving that Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) exists.

There is no government funding for disproving AGW. There is no funding for projects that may call into question the governments mantra that humans are causing AGW, the government does not want it disproven. The Government needs it to appear as real and as legitimate as possible in order to tax it. There is in fact a great pressure to ridicule or otherwise make irrelevant those who call into question the science that the Government is funding.

In fact, those who are indeed proving that AGW does not exist, face ridicule and scorn from the Main Stream Media, Politicians, and a few businessmen who stand to personally profit from it, such as Al Gore. There are many scientists that have staked their careers and reputations on this faulty science, and so they resist any research that may tend to make them look poor in the eyes of their peers, not to mention call into question the viability of their government grants.

The Mainstream Media, as was illustrated in the 2008 Election cycle, is decidedly favorable to the Democrats now in power, and those politicians want to pass legislation that will continue to fund their Socialist agenda, in fact, they are now counting on it not only to pay for their 11 Trillion dollar spending spree (the “Stimulus” Package), but to fund brilliant programs such as Socialized Health care. What will all of those Canadians do if we institute healthcare similar to theirs? Sorry Canada, we have Socialist Democrats in charge here now, much to the detriment of North America.

Those same Democrats want to Tax CO₂ Emissions based on PROVEN FAULTY SCIENCE that the government continues to exclusively fund in support of its taxing scheme. The Waxman-Markey Energy Bill, with its three years of unemployment benefits, is designed to tax carbon emissions, something Dr.’s Miskolczi and Zagoni have proven to be irrelevant in Anthropogenic Global Warming. The Waxman-Markley Bill is designed to generate revenue for the Federal government by taxing your exhalations, and is based on incorrect mathematical theory that is the basis of the government funded research. This tax will immediately, literally and overnight, wipe out the American Economy as billions of our dollars get transferred to the coffers of the Federal Government.

It is an unavoidable conclusion: The federal government is using the public’s general lack of knowledge about sophisticated mathematics to support faulty science in the name of generating revenue for itself.

This is intolerable. Change has indeed arrived; this issue has risen to the level of a Constitutional Civil Rights Violation as it will quite literally steal billions of dollars from American Businesses and citizens and is based in faulty science. It is not only fundamentally against the founding principles of Freedom in this Nation, it is naked thievery, and on a level heretofore unseen in all of human history. The outrageous immorality of what the government is doing by funding research which has only one purpose, to justify the existence of Carbon Cap and Trade Tax is nothing short of immoral. This is something akin to fiscal genocide supported and generated by the Federal Government.

In an article by Hans Bader for OpenMarket.org, Harvard economist Martin Feldstein warned Obama and Congress: "the barrage of tax increases proposed by President Barak Obama's budget could, if enacted by Congress, kill any chance of an early and sustained recovery." Feldstein goes further, "Mr. Obama’s biggest proposed tax increase is the cap-and-trade system of requiring businesses to buy carbon dioxide emission permits. . .CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf testified before the Senate Finance Committee on May 7 that the cap-and-trade price increases . . . would cost the average household roughly $1,600 a year, ranging from $700 in the lowest-income quintile to $2,200 in the highest-income quintile."

Consider also, the State of Oregon is attempting to do the same thing, keep in mind, these are two separate taxes, which for this state could mean  a 100 to 200% increase in your electricity bills, natural gas, gasoline, and nearly every other single product or service you do not generate for yourself. If you pay 1200$ (100$ a month for electricity) a year now, that will increase to at least 1800$ to as much as 3600$ a year, thats 300$ a month. Ask yourself, can you afford that? Can your neighbor?

All to reduce a naturally occurring emission that will have no effect on the climate regardless if it doubles in concentration or is cut in half?

There is an exceptionally high probability that Congress is operating with incorrect information. The certainty of this is approaching 100%. If for no other reason, America must stop the direction in which is rushing headlong in Congress, and reconsider the conclusions it is operating under. If the science they are using to justify the Carbon Tax is incorrect, we are literally handing billions of dollars to the Federal Government, for less than no legitimate reason.

The Cap and Trade legislation is not meant to lower emissions, it is meant to tax them and generate revenue for the government. The only science anyone hears about AGW is the government funded science, which has a predetermined outcome. This is a very bad combination.

The end result will beggar us all. That much is guaranteed.