Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
St. Louis Politics Frisco Conservative Examiner
Frisco Conservative Examiner

Obama's health care reform is bad news for seniors

May 5, 9:30 PMFrisco Conservative ExaminerDavid Leach
15 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Frisco Conservative Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

 

In a recent interview with The New York Times Magazine where he discussed many of his economic policies, President Obama has given an early indication as to the true costs of his health care reform agenda, particularly the ultimate costs to seniors.

Using his grandmother as an example, he explained how health care decisions, such as the hip replacement surgery she received after being diagnosed with cancer, might not be available to Americans in the future due to the costs, unless you have the money to pay out of pocket like Obama can.

I would have paid out of pocket for that hip replacement, just because she's my grandmother. Whether, sort of in the aggregate, society making those decisions to give my grandmother, or everybody else's aging grandparents or parents, a hip replacement when they're terminally ill is a sustainable model is a very difficult question.

Sustainable model? A difficult decision? Despite this apparent conundrum, Mr. Obama appears to have already made his decision on this matter, as we can see in the stimulus bill he promoted and signed into law.

Squeezed into the spending bill was a little known provision that establishes certain health care changes which are based on suggestions made by the former Health and Human Services Department nominee, Tom Daschle.  According to an editorial by Betsy McCaughey, former lieutenant governor of New York and an adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, these included:

  • Reducing costs by "guiding" doctor decisions
  • Doctors surrendering autonomy and learning to operate less like sole proprietors
  • Establishes the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research, whose goal would be to slow down new medications and techniques because these drive up costs
  • Forcing the elderly to accept the realities of aging and surrendering certain advanced treatments

Of course, hiding this in the stimulus bill was intentional to prevent debate, and it would now appear that it was a part of Obama's intentions all along.

Near the end of his interview, Mr. Obama claimed these decisions shouldn't be left up to government or politicians:

It is going to be very difficult to imagine the country making those decisions just through normal political channels.

Either he's lying, or it was always a part of his plan. Regardless, it looks like Americans better hope nothing happens to them as they get older, because Obama's health care reform is likely to be fatal to them if it does.

 

 

For more info: Arlen Specter a RINO no more, Gitmo prisoners? Dump 'em on Europe, Should Janet Napolitano resign?, Joe Biden was right about Obama... almost, Is freedom of speech dying on today's college campuses?

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Vancouver 2010
Get exclusive coverage from Examiners on the Winter Games in Vancouver.

Recent Articles

Thursday, November 26, 2009
In another example of how liberals get their panties in a wad when they are challenged for the decisions they make, Ken Salazar resorted to …
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated - Mark Twain These words by the great philosopher and humorist could have been said by conservatives …