Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Washington DC Politics Seattle Gun Rights Examiner
Seattle Gun Rights Examiner

Why gun control does not work: Two prime examples in Seattle

October 21, 10:45 AMSeattle Gun Rights ExaminerDave Workman
8 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Seattle Gun Rights Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

 

   Meet James Chung Hwang, a 24-year-old model citizen who has managed to rack up a dozen convictions for driving with a suspended license, one guilty plea for third-degree assault, several domestic violence convictions according to the on-line Seattle Post-Intelligencer, plus drug possession and malicious mischief beefs.
   Mr. Hwang is a walking testament to the failure of gun control because he is back in jail again for an incident that occurred a week ago. He allegedly was involved in a road rage incident in south Seattle that involved (gasp!) a stolen handgun, according to court documents.
   How the .45-caliber Springfield Armory semi-auto got into Hwang’s apparent posession (the gun was recovered "within lunging distance" from his stopped vehicle, according to a police report) is open to conjecture, but it’s a pretty safe bet that this handgun, which was reported stolen in Tacoma four years ago, was not obtained at a gun show, nor did the suspect stroll into a gun shop and buy it after passing a background check, nor did he get it through a straw purchase from any retailer now being sued by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
 
The gun -- a Springfield Arms 45-caliber semi-automatic -- was reported stolen from Tacoma in 2005.
 
   Felons cannot legally own or possess firearms. Laws forbidding that were supposed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, or so one would think if one subscribed to the gun prohibitionist philosophy of out-going ultra-Liberal Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels. Hwang is living proof that people who shouldn’t have guns are going to get them, and that nothing – including gun bans on city park property that translate to bans on personal protection for law-abiding citizens and their families and especially their children – will prevent society’s losers from bringing them to such places, anyway. In this case, some dues will be paid because Hwang has been charged with unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree by King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg.
   The P-I’s Casey McNerthney did a bang-up job detailing Hwang’s past. Hwang allegedly got involved in a road rage incident in which he pulled the gun from his trunk, where it was wrapped in a black T-shirt, according to witnesses, and then drove north on Rainier Avenue South for a few blocks before he was stopped by police. After that, his day went downhill fast.
   For the edification of those unfamiliar with Seattle geography, Hwang’s misadventure began in close proximity to John C. Little Sr. Park and Othello Playground. As he drove north on Rainier, Hwang passed within a couple of blocks of Brighton Playfield and went right past Columbia Park. He was stopped about two minutes’ driving time from the huge Genesee Park and Playfield.
 
Hwang...has a criminal history that includes a conviction for third-degree assault, unlawful firearm possession, several domestic violence convictions, malicious mischief and drug possession.
 
   Anybody want to guess the odds that if Hwang had wanted to visit any of these park facilities, he would have been discouraged by a sign alerting him to a ban on firearms?
   Evidently Nickels thinks so.
   A similar case developed in Clyde, Ohio a few years ago. After the Ohio Legislature adopted a state preemption and concealed carry statute in 2004, the City of Clyde immediately imposed a ban on concealed handguns in parks. Ohioans for Concealed Carry just as quickly challenged the ordinance. After a four-year court battle that cost the city and its taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled against the city and nullified the ordinance as unconstitutional. There should be a lesson in that for Seattleites who think this parks ban is going to prevent violent crime.
    Another case now unfolding in Seattle offers perhaps a starker lesson. The second trial of Naveed Haq, the accused Jewish Federation gunman is underway. Haq is accused of shooting six women at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle offices in July 2006, killing 58-year-old Pamela Waechter, the organization’s campaign director.
 
The Tri-Cities man is accused of forcing his way into the Belltown offices of the federation by forcing his way through a security door behind Stumbo's then 14-year-old niece...
 
   Haq legally purchased two handguns from two different Tri-Cities area retailers (the Wikipedia entry about this is in error, claiming that he bought the guns in Seattle), taking delivery of the second gun following the mandatory state waiting period for people who do not have a valid concealed pistol license. He then drove to Seattle after finding the Federation office on an Internet search and entered the building that also reportedly housed several other Jewish organizations, including the Washington State Jewish Historical Society, Jewish Education Council, and Jewish community newspaper, the JTNews. (Noticeably absent was an office for Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.)
   Now, pay attention: Haq gained entry through a security door by allegedly putting a gun to the back of a 14-year-old girl who was the niece of Cheryl Stumbo, one of the shooting victims, who worked in the Federation office. He forced the teen to use the intercom so that they could be “buzzed in” through the otherwise locked door. He then made his way up a stairwell, and quickly began shooting. In addition to Stumbo, the victims were Dayna Klein, Christina Rexroad, Layla Bush and Carol Goldman.
   Here’s a question for Mayor Nickels and anyone else who supports the parks ban on legally carried handguns, as protected by state statute:
   If a locked security door did not stop a determined gunman from committing a vicious, violent unconscionable attack on unarmed innocent women, just what in hell convinces you that a bunch of signs will do the trick?
  
 
 
 
Visit with other Gun Rights Examiners:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
And Don’t forget to visit:
 
 
 
 
 

 

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Year in Review
What will you remember from 2009? See the Politics Year in Review.
Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Predictably, the media drumbeat for more restrictions on firearms rights has begun in the wake of another shooting involving law enforcement officers …
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Today I’m sort of sharing a headline with my colleague David Codrea because yesterday’s release by the FBI of preliminary crime data for …