Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Houston News Global Warming Examiner
Global Warming Examiner

The economic utility of energy and global warming

March 25, 6:47 PMGlobal Warming ExaminerJohn Ryden
6 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Global Warming Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

 

Our use of energy, specifically fossil fuels, is the major source of greenhouse gas emissions. If we could cut down on our use of energy or switch to energy sources that do not release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, we could slow down global warming.

The problem is that the use of energy is the basis of our modern lifestyles and is not going to be given up easily. Fossil fuels produce over 85% of our total energy.
Consider that a person pedaling a stationary bike connected to an electric generator would produce a maximum of about 125 watts. Pedal like that for 8 hours per day and you would produce about 1 KWh of electricity. The cost of that electricity from the power company, delivered to you home, would cost you anywhere from $0.08 to $0.15 in this country.

If you consider the power that the average person uses each day in their car, riding the bus, and in their home; it amounts to the equivalent of a lot of human labor. One gallon of gasoline is approximately 12.5 KWh of electricity or about 12.5 man days worth of human labor.

Back before the industrial age, servants, slaves and animals of burden were popular because energy could not be purchased at any price. Electricity did not run to homes. There were no cars or gas stations. Most people use modern energy consuming devices to improve their lifestyles. Our modern economy’s use of energy has enabled large numbers of people to live lifestyles better than even the wealthy people of past centuries.

In economic terms, people derive a lot of economic utility from the energy they consume. They are not likely to give that up, at least not easily. If people are forced to choose paying higher prices for energy or spending their money on other items or services, energy could likely win out because of its higher utility to the individual. That is why demand for gasoline falls very little even when prices rise to very high levels.

There are only three ways to decrease the production of carbon dioxide:

  1. Substitute an energy source that produces less (or none) carbon dioxide for an energy source that is less environmentally friendly.
  2. Produce devices that provide the same utility as existing devices but use less energy.
  3. Use population control to decrease the number of people who desire to consume energy.
For more info: 
Power of a Human

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Inside 'New Moon'
Get inside info on all things New Moon.
Robert Pattinson | Taylor Lautner

Recent Articles

Friday, November 6, 2009
It is difficult to compare the cost of renewable energy to energy derived from fossil fuels. Renewable energy is free! No one charges for using the …
Friday, September 25, 2009
China is now the world’s largest producer of green house gases. This comes mainly from their huge use of coal to generate power. China is not …

Things to see and do

Autorama Show
26 Nov 2009 - 3 pm
George R. Brown Convention Center
More special event »
Sunken Temple
Downtown Aquarium