Fort Hood: Death by gun control
Yesterday at Fort Hood, disgruntled Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan murdered 12 soldiers and wounded 31 others before being shot and captured.
These soldiers were entrusted to carry fully automatic, military assault rifles when deployed to Afghanistan, where the shooter was about to be sent. But in America, these same soldiers are disarmed when on base. From the
Associated Press:
Soldiers at Fort Hood don't carry weapons unless they are doing training exercises.
Apparently, Hasan didn’t want to fulfill the commitment he gave when joining the Army, instead unilaterally deciding where he would deploy:
[Retired co-worker Col. Terry] Lee said Hasan had hoped Obama would pull troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq and got into frequent arguments with others in the military who supported the wars.
MCNBC reported that Hasan was under suspicion for having terrorist sympathies:
The Associated Press, quoting federal law enforcement officials, said Hasan had come to their attention at least six months ago because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats. The officials said they were still trying to confirm that he was the author.
This underscores the fact that law enforcement is not obligated to
stop crime, as shown by the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in
Castle Rock v. Gonzales.
Old media attempted to associate this mass murder with the one that happened to civilians in 1991:
The base is surrounded by the town of Killeen, where a man shot and killed 23 people in a Luby’s restaurant in October 1991.
“Unfortunately, this is a day we had dreaded,” said Hilary Shine, a spokeswoman for the city of Killeen. “Every time you hear of a mass casualty situation in Killeen, you think of Luby’s. ...
They inadvertently prove that civilian disarmament zones provide the perfect place for mass murderers: Luby’s patrons were disarmed due to Texas’s gun control laws. Suzanna Gratia Hupp, who lost her parents in the Luby's massacre, explains what happened in the video below.
In his book The Bias Against Guns, John Lott examined the relationship between the presence of legally-carried firearms and multiple murders. He concluded:
If
right-to-carry laws [legal concealed carry of handguns] allow citizens to limit the amount of attacks that still take place, the number of persons harmed should fall relative to the number of shootings… And indeed, that is what we find. The average number of people dying or becoming injured per attack declines by around 50 percent.
Lott also found that both the total number and rate of multiple murders in right-to-carry states are one-third that of restrictive states. In an email interview, he clarified this data by stating:
The simplest numbers showed a 67 percent drop in the number of attacks and a 79 percent decrease in the number of people killed or injured from such attacks. The number of people harmed fell by more than the number of attacks because some attacks that weren't deterred were stopped in progress by people with guns.
But some people don’t like John Lott, because he ostensibly is a “gun lobby” tool, even though he was anti-gun when he began his research (like this author). The same people who want to ban firearms tell us that police and military should carry guns to protect us.
Ron Borsch is a part-time, commissioned consultant trainer for the Bedford (Ohio) Police Department, with 30 full-time years of service and 17 years with SWAT. He still works part-time, managing the SEALE Police Academy in Bedford, where he specializes in tactically training first-responders, teaching them how to deal with what he calls “active killers.” Borsch defines the active killer as “one who commits rapid mass murder [incident occurring in 20 minutes or less, with 4 or more intentionally killed]. Active killers typically do NOT negotiate or take hostages.”
Borsch notes that nearly all mass murders occur in places where law-abiding citizens are banned from possessing firearms, either by property owners or government regulation.
Off-base, soldiers age 18 are eligible under
Texas law to carry a concealed handgun.
Meanwhile, the
Pentagon has a private security firm “charged with protecting and safeguarding the occupants, visitors, and infrastructure of the Pentagon, Navy Annex and other assigned Pentagon facilities.”
Nobody safeguarded our young men and women who were good enough to risk their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan.
For in-depth analysis of the issues discussed here, read Howard’s book Four Hundred Years of Gun Control: Why Isn’t It Working?, which deconstructs the gun control agenda and motivates more people to support our civil right of self-defense. Autographed copies are available from the author.