Media bias: Self-defense a crime?
An elderly woman and her family were in town for a convention, when an armed intruder broke into their hotel room, demanding their money. She drew her revolver and fired. The attacker suddenly became the retreater, as he ran into the parking lot and expired.
These are the facts of the case, but not if you listen to Old Media. The first report examined here may be guilty of nothing more than lazy reporting, but contains a teachable moment. The second report contains one of Old Media’s favorite lines when attempting to morph self-defense into murder.
NBC’s report was mostly accurate, except for one telltale of bias: “Police considered the city’s 69th homicide of 2009 a self-defense shooting.” NBC based this statement on the Columbus PD press release, which said this was the 69th homicide of 2009. Perhaps it was a simple oversight, but there is more to the story when the homicide is justified.
The half-truth is that this is a justifiable homicide, but the FBI doesn’t include it in their criminal homicide totals.
According to Sergeant Rich Weiner, Public Information Officer for Columbus, Ohio Police Department, this incident was included in their homicide totals for record keeping purposes. However, Sgt. Weiner stressed that within the law enforcement community, this incident isn’t considered a criminal homicide. “Just because it was classified a homicide for tracking purposes doesn’t always mean it’s a homicide,” said Weiner.
The FBI differentiates between criminal and justifiable homicides: The Program classifies justifiable homicides separately and limits the definition to: (1) the killing of a felon by a law enforcement officer in the line of duty; or (2) the killing of a felon, during the commission of a felony, by a private citizen.
For example, in the FBI’s 2008 Crime in the United States report, Table 1 displays the number of criminal homicides committed for the last 25 years, while Table 15 displays the number of civilian justifiable homicides for the last 5 years. These two numbers taken together–plus the number of law enforcement justifiable homicides from Table 14–equals the total number of homicide records in the Supplemental Homicide data for a given year. The concern here is that reporting this incident as part of the total homicides may confuse the uneducated reader into believing a 70-year-old lady:
· Added to Columbus’s “gun violence"?
· Committed a criminal act?
WBNS did a good job with their print copy, reporting that the defender has concealed carry license, and that the deceased attacker had a criminal history. However, in the accompanying video, the announcer leads with: “Police say a 70-year-old woman took the law into her own hands last night."
Here is how Sergeant Weiner responded to the question: Did you tell reporters the lady “took the law into her own hands?"
“No. That phrase is not a fair and accurate depiction of what happened. She was simply defending herself. Had the perpetrator been arrested, he would have been charged with robbery. Also, when a perpetrator forces his way into a dwelling with a gun–it doesn’t matter if he forced his way into an apartment, hotel room, or a house–we would also charge him with kidnapping."
The FBI definition of “robbery” justifies the use of deadly force in self-defense: The taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear. [emphasis added]
Ohio law states that aggravated robbery is a theft where the perpetrator uses a deadly weapon. [A] person is presumed to have acted in self defense or defense of another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if the person against whom the defensive force is used is in the process of unlawfully and without privilege to do so entering, or has unlawfully and without privilege to do so entered, the residence or vehicle occupied by the person using the defensive force.
When somebody enters the place where the defender lawfully has a right to be, intent upon committing a violent felony with a deadly weapon, Ohio law provides immediate remedy to the victim in the form of justifiable self-defense. This is no more taking the law into one’s own hands than is driving one’s car through a controlled intersection when they have a green light.
In addition, by protecting the lives of her family members, the defender took the same actions as a police officer had he/she arrived at the scene while the crime was still unfolding.
This elderly lady was obeying the law.
The only remaining question is: Are the media outlets obeying the higher laws of Truth and Integrity?
****************************************
For in-depth analysis of the issues discussed here, read Howard’s book Four Hundred Years of Gun Control: Why Isn’t It Working?, which deconstructs the gun control agenda and motivates more people to support our civil right of self-defense. Autographed copies are available from the author.