Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
New York Politics St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner

VPC inadvertently exposes myth of gun control as 'public safety'

June 23, 8:51 AMSt. Louis Gun Rights ExaminerKurt Hofmann
8 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


     Oleg Volk photo

The Violence Policy Center's Josh Sugarmann claims that with Obama having signed restrictive new tobacco legislation into law, gunmakers are now the "last unregulated industry."

President Obama's signing of a bill granting the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory authority over the tobacco industry now leaves the gun industry as the last American industry not regulated for health and safety.

Let me repeat. Guns are now the only consumer product manufactured in America not regulated by a federal agency for health and safety.

But wait--if one were to count every gun law on the books in this country at the federal, state, and local levels, the total would be in the tens of thousands.  Hardly sounds "unregulated" to me (let alone shall not be infringed).

Sugarmann attempts to justify his "unregulated" claim this way:

Health and safety regulatory powers commonly include the authority to set design standards, recall dangerous or defective products, and require reporting from manufacturers.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the default "regulator" of guns in our nation, has no such powers. ATF is currently empowered only to oversee commerce in guns.

In other words, if no federal agency has the power to dictate the design of a product, that product is "unregulated." 

The BATFE, by the way, does have considerable power in that regard.  Federal law specifies very strict licensing requirements for rifles and shotguns with short barrels, for suppressors (aka "silencers"), and even pistols with the ergonomic feature of a second grip, firearms (aside from those determined--by decree--to have a "sporting purpose") with a bore diameter of over half an inch, and fully automatic firearms.  Speaking of the BATFE and fully automatic firearms, get a load of what they manage to classify as a "machine gun" (also here).

Never mind that, though, my point is that Sugarmann claims that all the gun laws on the books are apparently not "safety measures."

Yet these are sales standards, not product safety standards.

Now wait a second--you mean those tens of thousands of gun laws aren't about safety?  I agree, of course, but I didn't expect the forcible citizen disarmament cheerleaders to come out and admit it.

 

Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:

  • Atlanta: Armed customer stops robbery
  • Austin: Brady Campaign: More government, more crime
  • Boston: Do Massachusetts Gun Laws apply to all? (Part II)
  • Charlotte: Dangers of gun registration: 'The Belgian Corporal'
  • Cleveland: Is a gang war brewing in Lorain?
  • DC: Under Obamacare, where will Canadians go for medical services?
  • Denver: What happens to you when you buy a gun?
  • Los Angeles: SoCal Churches go concealed carry.
  • Minneapolis: Dirty Deeds in Virginia
  • National: U.S. guns blamed for Jamaican crime
  • Seattle: Lautenberg’s legislation cloak’s anti-gun senator’s true intention
  • Wisconsin: Gun rights advocates make progress

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Recent Articles

Friday, November 20, 2009
In late October, President Obama signed into law the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, making it a federal crime to …
Thursday, November 19, 2009
. . . Mike Bloomberg, that is. Perhaps stung by jealousy at the amount of publicity NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg got from his little (possibly …

Things to see and do

Savion Glover
21 Nov 2009 - 8 pm
Blue Note - New York
More dance »