Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Minneapolis Politics St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner

This is how the BATFE keeps us safe

May 26, 4:11 AMSt. Louis Gun Rights ExaminerKurt Hofmann
25 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


    About 1/2" away from federal "gun criminality"

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE, commonly shortened to ATF) is a busy agency.  What with railroading owners of malfunctioning rifles into prison and "arresting" gun parts, they're hard-pressed to trace the guns seized in Mexico ("700-weapon backlog"), which themselves compose a tiny fraction of those seized (think about what that says about the "90%" lie).

One would think, then, that the agency would be careful to concentrate on priorities; to--I don't know--focus on dangerous criminals (well, those, and people whose semi-automatic rifles malfunction).  One would be wrong, though.

Wrong, that is, unless one agrees with the BATFE's apparent position, that attaching a handle to a pistol is such a nefarious, sinister action that it justifies a 10 year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.

I'm not making this up--from the BATFE themselves:

ATF has long held that by installing a vertical fore grip on a handgun, the handgun is no longer designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand. Therefore, if individuals install a vertical fore grip on a handgun, they are “making” a firearm requiring registration with ATF’s NFA Branch. Making an unregistered “AOW” ["Any Other Weapon"--kind of the feds' catch-all term for firearms that do not fit neatly in their legal definitions of traditional firearm categories like handgun, rifle, and shotgun] is punishable by a fine and 10 years’ imprisonment. Additionally, possession of an unregistered “AOW” is also punishable by fine and 10 years’ imprisonment.

To lawfully add a vertical fore grip to a handgun, a person must make an appropriate application on ATF Form 1, “Application to Make and Register a Firearm.” The applicant must submit the completed form, along with a fingerprint card bearing the applicant’s fingerprints; a photograph; and $200.00. The application will be reviewed by the NFA Branch. If the applicant is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under Federal, State, or local law, and possession of an “AOW” is not prohibited in the applicant’s State of residence, the form will be approved. Only then may the person add a vertical fore grip to the designated handgun.

The above photo is of my Kel-Tec PLR-16, kind of a cheap "assault pistol," that I bought mostly for fun, although I reckon that at farily close range, I could use it in such a way as to be a real problem for anyone with bad intentions.  Being paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair, however, with very limited lower trunk strength, anything I can do to improve stability would be very useful, which is why I was interested in adding a vertical fore grip to the gun.

That's when I did a bit of research and found out that just attaching the thing could be used as justification to lock me up for a quarter of the time I've existed so far.

The possibility of the BATFE going after someone for "felonious addition of a handle," or whatever they want to call it, is not just some arcane, alarmist theory--they have charged people for doing it.

24. The 9 millimeter and .22 caliber pistols seized by ATF
were modified by adding an additional grip.

25. Title 26, United States Code Section 5845(e) defines
"any other weapon" as:

... any weapon or device capable of being concealed from which
a shot can be discharged through the energy of an explosion
... Such term shall not include a pistol or revolver having a
rifled bore, or rifled bores, or weapons designed, made or
intended to be fired from the shoulder and not capable of
firing fixed ammunition.

26. A "pistol" is defined in Section 5845 as

A weapon originally designed, made and intended to fire a
projectile (bullet) from one or more barrels when held in one
hand, and having (a) a chamber(s) as an integral part(s) of or
permanently aligned with, the bore(s); and (b) a short stock
designed to be gripped by one hand and at an angle to and
extending below the line of the bore(s). 27 CFR 178.11
(emphasis added).

Granted, the U.S. District Court of South Carolina ruled against the BATFE's interpretation in that case, but that doesn't stop them from trying to get by with it elsewhere, and they haven't, to my knowledge, changed their position.

To sum up, then, we are to believe that--Constitutional questions aside (even forgetting shall not be infringed, what Constitutionally enumerated power of the federal government justifies federal regulation of attaching handles to firearms?)--the American public is made safer by the impositions of these bizarre, arbitrary restrictions.  We are, in fact, apparently expected to believe that a firearm configured in such a way that a paraplegic can fire it more accurately poses an unreasonable threat to public safety.

Anyone who wants to remind me that there is a way to do it legally should save their breath.  Paying $200, or $5, or 5 cents, for that matter--not to mention the fingerprints, photographs, and all the other privacy-crushing hoops, for the "privelege" of attaching a handle to a gun--is not for liberty-loving, patriotic Americans.  I might be reduced to biting at the BATFE's ankles, but I'll be damned if I ever lick their boots.

So have I attached the handle (to that pistol, and any others I've acquired since)?  I won't be saying here.  After all, I don't have the advantage of being a politically connected gangsta' rapper.

 

Check out other Gun Rights Examiners:

  • Atlanta: Carrying a firearm openly is not illegal in Georgia
  • Austin: In memoriam: Values then and now
  • Boston: The Educated Patriot: Domestic Enemies: The Reconquista
  • Charlotte: Armed self-defense: 'To shoot fast, you have to see fast'
  • Cleveland: Remembering those who secure our freedoms
  • DC: Congress joins states in making parks safe for gun carry
  • Denver: On Memorial Day, honor the fallen by honoring our living service members
  • Los Angeles: Gun Control: O.C. Sheriff alienates voters before election run.
  • Minneapolis: A great couple of days in the Midwest
  • National: A Memorial Day Remembrance
  • Seattle: Philosphy 101: Is there such a thing as an 'absolute right?'
  • Wisconsin: Gun rights advocates make progress
More About: gunrights · BATFE

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Friday, December 4, 2009
Colorado State University is one of the few institutions of higher learning outside Utah where licensed carry of a defensive firearm is not against …
Thursday, December 3, 2009
The word "terrorism" tends to appear rather frequently on the pages of the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner, but (fortunately or not, depending …

Things to see and do

George Winston
20 Dec 2009 - 7 pm
Orchestra Hall
More music »
Cincinnati Bengals at Minnesota Vikings
Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome