Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
New Orleans Politics Nonpartisan Examiner
Nonpartisan Examiner

Open letter to American public: declare obvious torture, demand Truth and Reconciliation to end it

November 2, 11:55 PMNonpartisan ExaminerCarl Herman
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Nonpartisan Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


   We hold these Truths to be self-evident...

 

"I will never apologize for the United States of America - I don't care what the facts are."-George H.W. Bush, repeatedly in 1988 in his campaign for US President. Mr. Bush was responding to the U.S. Navy warship Vincennes, illegally in Iranian waters, shooting down an Iranian commercial airliner on routine flight in a commercial corridor in Iranian airspace. All 290 civilian people in the aircraft were killed. This was at the end of the US-backed War of Aggression of Iraq upon Iran. When a military targets and fires upon another country’s peaceful aircraft, that is a blatant act of war. The US, to this day, denies responsibility for the attack.
 
A constitutional republic, like the US in name, can only survive with citizens holding their elected officials accountable within their limits of authority. As Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, “That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
 
The consent of the governed expressly forbids torture in the US Constitution. This restraint is replicated in domestic law and three times in US-ratified areas of international law (here, here, and here).    
 
The extent of recent US torture of detainees is horrific. The New York Times just reported new memos from the FBI document “rack and screw” tortures that included naked shackling on floors and ceilings while enduring sleep deprivation, and threats of imminent death from gunshot and/or power tools. This torture evidence is on top of what we already know (here and here), that Bush’s lawyers wrote that "non-torture" included everything that did not result in death, and even death could be excused if the primary purpose of the interrogation was questions and answers, not torture. Documented techniques of apparent "non-torture" included controlled drowning, being naked in 45° F. cells for days, sleep and food deprivation for days, shackled in painful positions for days, threats to sexually assault and torture family members, and if Abu Ghraib tactics are included: sodomizing with broom handles and lights, forced homosexual acts, rape, pouring on phosphoric acid, and smearing faces and bodies in feces.[1] The links show the sources of these interrogation techniques are the US Military's own investigation, the CIA Inspector General's report, and Pulitzer-Prize journalist Seymour Hersh's received testimony from government insiders (Hersh broke the Vietnam War Mai Lai Massacre story and Abu Ghraib from insiders). For an outstanding timeline of reports on prisoner abuse, read this.
 
Credible sources, such as UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray, testify that the CIA used illegal rendition to bring prisoners under more severe torture in other countries. Murray reports that CIA-managed torture in Uzbekistan included rape with broken bottles, torturing children in front of parents to force confessions, and boiling prisoners alive.
 
Moreover, the human beings who were tortured are “detainees,” people not charged with a crime. This is in direct violation of habeas corpus and most of the “inalienable rights” our founders sacrificed to realize in our nation. These techniques were also applied to known American citizens under the authority of the US Executive Branch.
 
Torture upon detainees puts US troops at risk of being tortured, of course. Think about that when you think about supporting our troops, along with thinking the greatest support is to bring them home in light of the lies that put them in harm’s way.
 
Americans: your charge as an adult citizen is to think, speak and act in support of the US Constitution and values of the Declaration of Independence. Being American is a political distinction; responding to torture with anything but opposition is un-American by definition.
 
Americans: it’s your charge as an adult to recognize torture when it’s brought to your attention. If you read the applicable laws I’ve linked, they’re intended to be easily understood. Torture is pain and/or suffering, or threat to apply it. Cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment is torture. Proper treatment is respect for the inherent dignity of human beings, and only convicted criminals get punished, not detainees (detainment without charging a crime is also illegal on its face). You are responsible adults; your heart and mind are sufficient to declare what does and does not fall into these categories.
 
Americans: it’s your charge to demand national security through justice, dignity, cooperation under law, and freedom. Unless you feel comfortable arguing that the documented evidence is not torture, then you are obligated under the Constitution to act to stop and prosecute torture. The alternative is to believe your political “leader” (Fuhrer in German), to accept whatever the leader dictates. So, if you choose to be un-American, when George Bush and Barack Obama say, “We do not torture,” then that’s good enough for you, no matter what the facts are.
 
Benjamin Franklin predicted that the American experiment would end in dictatorship, because whatever political leadership dictated would be good enough, that Americans would be incapable of the responsibility I've explained:
 
On September 18, 1787, just after signing the US Constitution, Benjamin Franklin met with members of the press. He was asked what kind of government America would have. Franklin: “A republic, if you can keep it.” In his speech to the Constitutional Convention, Franklin admonished: “This [U.S. Constitution] is likely to be administered for a course of years and then end in despotism... when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.”
The Quotable Founding Fathers, p. 39 http://books.google.com/books?id=TizXI1yOTBQC&dq .
 
Americans: will you do your part in thought, speech and action to form a more perfect union, establish justice, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity? Will you work and love for the US to truly be the land of the free and the home of the brave?
 
Choose well: you will live in the land of your choice. I recommend a policy response of Truth and Reconciliation. The criminality is so pervasive among the leadership of both parties in our political duopoly that they will never prosecute each other. The most practical response is to exchange the end of criminal activity, return of stolen public assets (~25% of annual Department of Defense budgets), and truth for their freedom from prosecution. There are probably hundreds of people who would love to have a “Scrooge conversion” to transform into constructive professionals working for the good of all humanity. Truth and Reconciliation MUST include all areas of government crime and/or harmful acts that should be disclosed for public benefit. Whatever we now know, we can be sure that's just the tip of the iceberg.
 
Please watch this powerful 9-minute video clarifying why what has happened is obviously under the legal definition of torture. The source is Alliance for Justice.
 
As always, please share this article with all who say they choose American law and values over propagandized criminal acts. If you appreciate my work, please subscribe by clicking under the article title (it’s free). Please feel free to use my library of articles to help build a brighter future. 


[1] What Really Happened. Torture of Iraqi POWs. May 10, 2004: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/torture_pow.html , ABC News. Ross, B & Esposito, R. CIA’s Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described. Nov. 18, 2005: http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/print?id=1322866 , Hersh, S. Torture at Abu Ghraib. New Yorker, May 10, 2004: http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/05/10/040510fa_fact .
 

 

More About: politics

Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Inside 'New Moon'
Get inside info on all things New Moon.
Robert Pattinson | Taylor Lautner

Recent Articles

Monday, November 23, 2009
Please click and read the outstanding work of Stephen Lendman in Paid lying – what passes for major media journalism. Stephen documents major …
Monday, November 23, 2009
A false flag attack is a military opertion that includes a nation attacking itself disguised as an attack coming from another nation. The purpose of a …

Things to see and do

Preservation Hall Jazz Band
25 Nov 2009 - 8 pm
Preservation Hall
More music »
D-Day Beaches, The
National World War II Museum