Motorcycling 101: Counter-steering essentials shows the derivation of the idealized equation for the relationship between speed, lean angle, and turn radius:
Radius = Speed^2 / ( Gravity * Tangent( CG Lean Angle ) )
The series Counter-steering revisited: Redux -- how it works, discusses how the force causing acceleration into the turn, and balancing torques -- again, idealized -- interact to enable a motorcycle to turn. The question left unanswered is: How close to the real-world are these equations?
With seven laps remaining, on board with Valentino Rossi at his home track in San Marino, we get the test data. The telecast shows the bike’s lean angle, and telemetry for the bike’s RPM, gear, position on the track and speed. Satellite imagery of the track provides the final component: an approximate measurement of the radius Rossi is following through each turn.

Yamaha's Valentino Rossi of Italy, right, is chased by the Honda of third placed Daniel Pedrosa, of Spain, and by Yamaha's Jorge Lorenzo of Spain, second placed during the San Marino MotoGP at the Misano circuit, in Misano, Italy, Sunday, Sept. 6, 2009. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia)
| Notes | Lean Angle (degrees) | Speed (ft/s) | Theoretical Min. Radius (ft) | Actual Radius (ft) | Actual / Theory |
| Right T3 at 61 degrees. 135 km/h. 11997 rpm. 3rd. | 61 | 123 | 261 | 383 | 1.467 |
| Right T4 at 60 degrees. 80 km/h. 8364 rpm. 1st. | 60 | 73 | 95 | 118 | 1.234 |
| Right T5 at 60 degrees 102 km/h. 10398 rpm. 2nd. | 60 | 93 | 155 | 216 | 1.393 |
| Left T6 at 57 degrees. 127 km/h. 13022 rpm. 2nd. | 57 | 116 | 270 | 272 | 1.007 |
| Left T7 at 20 degrees. 264 km/h. 17552 rpm. 6th. | 20 | 241 | 4943 | 7197 | 1.456 |
| Left T8 at 56 degrees. 91 km/h. 9705 rpm. 1st. | 56 | 83 | 144 | 179 | 1.243 |
| Right T9 at 52 degrees. 121 km/h. 12332. 1st. | 52 | 110 | 295 | 446 | 1.510 |
| Right T10 at 61 degrees. 74 km/h. 8332. 1st. | 61 | 67 | 78 | 133 | 1.697 |
| Right T11 at 58 degrees. 270 km/h. 17115 rpm. 6th. | 58 | 246 | 1176 | 1183 | 1.006 |
| Right T12 at 50 degrees. 238 km/h. 16332 rpm. 4th. | 50 | 217 | 1227 | 1239 | 1.010 |
Rossi’s body position (a significant factor affecting the effective lean angle of the combined CG) is neglected in this analysis. However, so are a host of other factors including: front/rear tire slippage, front/rear tire tracking radii, lean angle adjustment for contact patch offset from the central bike axis, front/rear weight distribution, etc.
What we see in turns six, eleven and twelve is Rossi’s body-position nearly perfectly canceling all the other factors excluded from this equation, enabling him to achieve a nearly perfect theoretical minimum radius for the speed and lean angle he rode.
Readers are invited to speculate in the comment section below about the variance from the theoretical minimum in the other seven turns measured.
For more information:
- Counter-steering revisited: Redux -- how it works
- Counter-steering -- how it works: Part 2 -- force causing acceleration
- Counter-steering -- how it works: Part 3 -- balancing torques
- Counter-steering -- how it works: Part 4 -- lessons learned
- Counter-steering -- how it works: Part 5 -- lean-angle force dynamics