Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Billings Politics Miami Health Policy Examiner
Miami Health Policy Examiner

Global Warming: Adapting policy to climate change

June 24, 3:35 PMMiami Health Policy ExaminerHumberto Caiaffa
7 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Miami Health Policy Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

The last recent months have shown an interesting facet of legislation and its relation with the problem of global warming. The effectiveness of our legislators in creating new laws to confront this crisis remains to be seen. The recent passing of the carbon cap-and-trade bill sponsored by Democratic Representatives Henry Waxman and Edward Markey, has been the first step of Congress and the Obama administration to tackle this issue.

The basic change under the cap-and-trade bill is that it will limit the amount of carbon that U.S. companies can produce. If they exceed the limit (“cap”) of carbon emissions imposed, they can purchase (“trade”) carbon allowances or permits to cover for the excess emissions. The money received from the purchase of these allowances will be used to invest on environmentally friendly companies and, could also be distributed to low income families to help them with costs of energy use.
 
The cap-and-trade bill has brought a lot of skepticism since the House Energy and Commerce Committee was planning on it back in April. A major example is given by the criticism received by Coal manufacturing states like, Illinois and West Virginia. There is a concern that the bill could prove to be fatal for their coal mining industry.  Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.) and Rep. Shelly Moore Capito (R-W.Va) criticized the bill since the beginning of the year and it is easy to understand why. According to a study by the National Mining Association, coal mining provides more than half of the nation’s electricity, generates more than 550,000 jobs nationwide, and contributes $8.2 billion in payroll.
 
There is a general fear that the bill could potentially bring more pressure to the economy in three areas: damage the U.S. manufacturing sector and force jobs to move overseas, lead to higher energy prices to consumers, and ineffective to stop global warming in the future.
 
Six months prior the United Nations Climate Conference in Copenhagen, it is clear that government intends to make an effort to adapt to climate change and reduce the impact of global warming. The effort is encouraging and progressive in ideals, but the costs of the change and its impact still remains unclear. The Global Humanitarian Forum report titled: “ Human Impact Report: Climate Change – The Anatomy of a Silent Crisis.”, warns us that 300 million lives are already seriously affected by gradual warming of the earth. Global warming is here, it is real, and is important to create new laws to change the way we manage our energy, deal with pollution, and respect our nature. I hope this is just the beginning of a new administration willing to put a step forward and confront this important issue. It is time for the United States to consider natural conservation and environmental prosperity our priorities on health policy.

 

For more info visit the following websites: 

                                                                             

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Friday, November 6, 2009
2009 H1N1 Influenza Vaccination Sites Free Vaccinations2009 H1N1 Miami-Dade County accinations Downtown Clinic 1350 NW 14th St. Miami Monday through …
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The two main reasons why health care reform is necessary are moral values and economic stability. According to the US census bureau 46 million US …