.png)
GLOBAL WARMING or GLOBAL COOLING? by Angelos Backus
Here is the actual letter sent to congress by a group of highly accredited scientists stating that "Earth has been cooling for 10 years". The authors signed below with their credentials for cross reference. Below the letter is a link to a recent article with similar tones and more scientific evidence. All comments are welcome.
OPEN LETTER TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES: YOU ARE BEING DECEIVED ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING
You have recently received an Open Letter from the Woods Hole Research Center, exhorting you to act quickly to avoid global disaster. The letter purports to be from independent scientists, but that Center is the former den of the President's science advisor, John Holdren, and is far from independent. This is the same science advisor who has given us predictions of “almost certain” thermonuclear war or eco-catastrophe by the year 2000, and many other forecasts of doom that somehow never seem to arrive on time.
The facts are:
The sky is not falling; the Earth has been cooling for ten years, without help. The present cooling was NOT predicted by the alarmists' computer models, and has come as an embarrassment to them.
The finest meteorologists in the world cannot predict the weather two weeks in advance, let alone the climate for the rest of the century. Can Al Gore? Can John Holdren? We are flooded with claims that the evidence is clear, that the debate is closed, that we must act immediately, etc, but in fact
THERE IS NO SUCH EVIDENCE; IT DOESN'T EXIST.
The proposed legislation would cripple the US economy, putting us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors. For such drastic action, it is only prudent to demand genuine proof that it is needed, not guesswork, and not false claims about the state of the science.
DEMAND PROOF, NOT CONSENSUS
Finally, climate alarmism pays well. Many alarmists are profiting from their activism. There are billions of dollars floating around for the taking, and being taken.
Signed by,
Robert H. Austin
Professor of Physics
Princeton University
Fellow APS, AAAS
American Association of Arts and Science Member National Academy of Sciences
William Happer
Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics
Princeton University
Fellow APS, AAAS
Member National Academy of Sciences
S. Fred Singer
Professor of Environmental Sciences Emeritus, University of Virginia
First Director of the National Weather Satellite Service
Fellow APS, AAAS, AGU
Roger W. Cohen
Manager, Strategic Planning and Programs, ExxonMobil Corporation (retired)
Fellow APS
Harold W. Lewis
Professor of Physics Emeritus
University of California at Santa Barbara
Fellow APS, AAAS; Chairman, APS Reactor Safety Study
Laurence I. Gould
Professor of Physics
University of Hartford
Chairman (2004), New England Section of APS
Richard Lindzen
Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Fellow American Academy of Arts and Sciences, AGU, AAAS, and AMS
Member Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters
Member National Academy of Sciences
For More information: Why did the EPA smother a scientific report that questioned global warming?
Thanks to Marc Marano from Climatedepot.com for the letter











Comments
Isn't this an "Appeal to Authority"?
And to claim that Woods Hole Research Center scientists are not independent because the center is "the former den of the President's science advisor (sic), John Holdren" is, well, laughable!
Maybe funny but true all the same.
Not old yet:
LOL!!! Do you ask this of your professors in college when they are trying to teach you something? Who are you going to believe if not authorities on this subject? The homeless guy on the corner?
GLOBAL WARMING OR CLIMATE CHANGE?
By Angelos Backus
My article Global warming or global cooling?intimidated many of Al Gore's Kool-aid drinkers to rephrase their theme Global Warming to Climate change. Changing the name of their theme doesn't meant that they changed their thinking. Their new theme relates to their initiatives of wind power, and electric automobiles. Ironically, these initiatives will be the cause of climate change!
In accordance with the first law of thermal dynamics, energy can not be created or destroyed. However, energy can be converted to another form. It is this unwariness of energy conservation by Al Gore and his uninformed followers that has perpetuated the alarmist notion of global warming.
Let's analyze wind power...
Wind is created by the potential difference of two or more atmospheric area conditions. One area being under the influence of low pressure, and the other under the influence of higher pressure. Furthermore, in accordance wi
Funny they accuse a group of scientists of being biased because of a political affiliation but fail to mention that an affiliate of EXXONMOBIL is one of the undersigned of this "letter".
Lindzen has since admitted that he doesn't actually believe that there is no evidence.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!