Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin has revealed that there is a “monolith” on the moon of Mars. On July 22, during an interview on CSPAN’s Washington Journal, Aldrin mentioned the monolith when he was promoting further exploration and development of the moon as well as going to Mars.
Did extraterrestrial visitors put the monolith there? Aldrin’s statement reinforces comments made by other astronauts that extraterrestrial vehicles were present during at least the first moon landing. It also raises questions such as “who really put the monolith there and how does Aldrin know about it?”
Aldrin’s comment is sure to attract the attention of news media covering the European Exopolitics Summit 2009 in Barcelona, Spain, July 25 and 26. The summit is titled, “A New Paradigm for a World in Crisis”.
The Barcelona event is promoted as “an event that will mark a milestone in Spain and will set a precedent in Europe. It will be the occasion in which the leaders and proponents of disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence by all of the world's governments, European as well as the U.S., will meet in a historic summit in Barcelona.”
Aldrin's surprise revelation declared:
We should go boldly where man has not gone before. Fly by the comets, visit asteroids, visit the moon of Mars. There’s a monolith there. A very unusual structure on this potato shaped object that goes around Mars once in seven hours. When people find out about that they’re going to say ‘who put that there? Who put that there?’ The universe put it there. If you choose, God put it there…”
Will NASA attempt to dismiss Aldrin's comment and lessen the credibility of one of America’s heroes? Or will it finally start to admit the truth it has been hiding about UFOs of extraterrestrial origin?
Aldrin’s revelation is likely to create an Internet ‘buzz’ for awhile. So stay alert to more news about Buzz Aldrin's groundbreaking declaration!
Related articles:
NASA Plans to Bomb the Moon (contains quotes by other astronauts on moon UFO sightings)
U.S. to Bomb Moon on UFO Witness John Lennon’s Birthday
Comments
Basically, Aldrin was trying to portray interesting things in space and give an example of people's response and need to question them and to fund exploration. He then goes on to answer the question he asked, and says "the universe put it there". I.e., He says it is a natural formation.
Also don't get all excited over the word 'monolith'. The word just means a single great stone, not necessarily with any artificial connotation.
So you have misinterpreted his statements.
Rj, it is you who is misinterpreting his statement. He didn't say it was a big rock. He used the word "Monolith" very carefully.
When he said "the universe put it there", he was clearly mocking that statement. He was referring to the people who keep explaining away all the mounting evidence that Aliens are here in our local solar system.
There are now SEVERAL astronauts who have admitted encountering alien and/or unnatural occurrences during their travels. If we can't believe our astronauts, who can you believe? Congress!??!?!
I think you need to watch it again, and try to listen to what he is saying, not what you want him to be saying. He is primarily talking about funding issues for space exploration and development. And at the end, he is clearly explaining the nature of the rock to be natural. He does not use the word 'alien', which would be very simple to do if that is what he meant. He does not comment on the nature of the rock, at the end, in a questioning voice, or one inflected with satire. He very simply states, "the universe put it there". That means, it is natural.
But no need to believe me. I'm sure he will be questioned on this, and give a further explanation of what he meant. I just hope, when it doesn't agree with you, that further claims of "Coverup!" are not made.
Though, considering how much you all 'Want to Believe', I expect those claims are inevitable.
It sounds like you are the one who is hearing what you want to hear.
Aldrin has referenced this monolith at other times.
Clearly you are hearing what you 'Want to Believe'.
Sounds like you are afraid to believe and don't want anyone else to experience something stirring & interesting either.
Then tell Dr Edgar Mitchell, 6th man to walk on the Moon, that this is totally bunk. Was he referring to natural rocks during this interview?
www youtube com/watch?v=RhNdxdveK7c
(put dots in the url)
I'm sorry but you've lost me: I have no comments about Dr Edgar Mitchell. He doesn't even appear in this video. As far as I know, he hasn't commented on it. I am explaining Mr Aldrin's comments regarding an interesting natural rock formation on Phobos.
By what you are stating Monolith's are not something natural but something that has been created by the hands(flipper,claws,etc..) of artists.
I think that maybe a few too many viewings of 2001 have influenced your scientific viewpoint?
FYI,
Monoliths are both natural and manmade.It would be odd to not have different types of terrain and geology on different moons and planets.
This reminds me of the "Marbles" that were found on the moon. There was a very explainable mundane answer to what they were. But the conspiracy-believers had to grasp on to the fantasies because they were "proof" of Aliens.
Origin:
1820–30; < L monolithus < Gk monólithos made of one stone.
Definition:A monolith is a monument or natural feature consisting of a single massive stone or rock. Erosion usually exposes these formations, which are most often made of very hard and solid metamorphic rock.
References:
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Category:Natural_monoliths
We all know that Dr. Ed Mitchell fell of of the common sense bandwagon quite some time ago, so using his as a reference point is pointless.
By the way,
How is the signature collecting going for the E.T. Commission?
With the Metatron technology being used to support it, I cannot see how it could fail.
Unless the Metatron Technology that is being used to make it pass does not work?
By the way, this 'revelation' by Mr Aldrin is actually referencing a picture taken In 1998, by the Mars Global Surveyor. It has been discussed quite a while, and is nothing new. Here is a picture of it:
images.spaceref.com/news/2007/phobos-monolith.jpg
It's called a 'monolith' for the pure definition of the word: a big stone all by itself. Nothing artificial implied. And in fact, Mr Aldrin explains at the end of the video it is natural (put there by the universe, or god).
I REALLY hope people can do better than this for an example of aliens.
Sounds like you are not employing your analytical skills.
How does a 'giant rock' wind up on the surface of a small moon? If it were a meteorite it would not be just 'sitting there'. The impact would have broken or buried it, or it would be sitting in a large crater. If it is a large rock, to be just sitting there, it would have to have been deposited there. Or maybe you think it just parked itself there with the help of the 'Universe', or God?
RJ: Thank you for your words of common sense. Jeff Peckman, I love you, but you are an easy believer. You seriously need a better BS detector, and someone you trust to tell you when you sound looney. This could have been written in a way that doesn't sound like the work of a "UFO nutjob", and more like the work of a sane, educated, reasoning human being. I'm for UFO disclosure, but don't want to jump to quick conclusions. 2001 Space Odyssey, anyone???
It is interesting to me that the Russians are planning to launch a ship to land on phobos to investigate this 'giant rock'.
Here is something interesting from China.
Get your ass to Mars!
It is amazing to hear people comment on subjects that are so complex and these people break it down to black and white. My work with a former NASA designer of the shuttle has spent more than 30 years listening to stories around NASA and it is what is not being put out to the public that idiots stating they no facts about space ships or aliens that is just ignorance. Instead of commenting just to satisfy their own EGO, maybe they should actually ask and research why Obama or Bush did not come out and announce findings. Why Brazil, Mexico and France for example have told their public factual evidence yet the US refuses to cover the story. Why is the US media and many employees blocked because of national security. Just listen to the former defense minister from Canada who states and on video, America controls the disclosure for the entire world as does a Government elite group that wants control over technology and people, that is why its not on 60 minutes yet. Wake up idiot!
Go to ESA.int pictures of Mars. Go to page 35, western perspective view of Hale Crater. If you can't find structures here and at least question why would the European Space Agency allow a picture of a City in their pictures especially if it was fake and destroy credibility? Just take your time and zoom in and you don't see potential structures, their are structures, buildings, etc... so either ESA (European Space Agency is a fraud or Someone has falsified a picture of Mars and left it in their stuff. ) By the way if you comment on this without doing the research it just proves your ignorance or your paid to make stupidity look like it is normal.
Anthony F Riordan Jr
Universityofmars.blogspot.com
Anthony, I can't find the pictures per your directions. The pictures of Hale crater that I can find just show rocks and crater walls. You'll need to post better directions to whatever pictures you are talking about.
People,
This is NOT a rock. This is manufactured by some species.
palermoproject.com/Mars_Anomalies/%20images_mars/55103layers.gif
"what is not being put out to the public that idiots stating they no facts about space ships or aliens that is just ignorance."
Your fukking grammar is atrocious, rocket scientist. Try "know", not "no", and you'll come across a BIT more credible.
You people are in denial if you think he's just talking about a "rock". He seems awfully excited about a rock. He thinks the American people will be excited about a rock.
Answer me this, why does he want to go all the way to Mars to look at this rock, when there are plenty of rocks we can study on the moon?
>You people are in denial if you think he's >just talking about a "rock". He seems awfully >excited about a rock. He thinks the American >people will be excited about a rock.
Well, you seem pretty excited about a rock.
>Answer me this, why does he want to go all >the way to Mars to look at this rock, when >there are plenty of rocks we can study on the >moon?
He also talked about going to the moon. And Mars is within reach of current capabilities. And Mars has a whole new set of issues to allow us to grapple with and learn from (including having different rocks than the moon). And he's trying to excite the viewers into continuing to fund space exploration.
And of course, he says at the end 'the universe put it there, or god did.' If he meant aliens, it's easy to say aliens. He didn't. His explanation if that it is there from natural processes.
I thought that Jeff stated that we not only have proof of moon bases but NASA has the capability of traveling to any planet that they want? This is just being covered up to keep the funding.
If that is true why are we so concerned about a rock that may or not be made by the hands of aliens?
Aliens known as the "Delta" have been mining our Moon for hundreds if not thousands of years and also are on Saturns Moon Titan
Secrets of UFOs (Unconfirmed Data)
Colonel Ed Black writes,
"During the 1920's and 1930's astronomers all over the world were reporting strange flashes and blinking lights on the surface of the Moon, that was dismissed as being impacts of meteorites. An alien race known as "The Delta" have exploited our Moon for hundreds of years, they have conducted mining operations on a massive scale and there is not a 50 mile square area on the surface of the Moon that does not show evidence of this. As you know, we only see the near side of the Moonwhile the far is always facing away and is the current focus of Delta mining activity. During the 1920's,and 30'sDelta knew that we were well into our scientific age and that it would be but a matter of years before we would be intensely studying the Moon, and thus they greatly expanded their operations on the visible side
and got all they could get out of it before having to withdraw to the hidden side.
The Delta are not full of good will towards us, they consider us to be slightly more important than a nuisance, but they do have a strong moral code and have often shown a great deal of restraint where it concerns us. By and large they respect that the Earth is our planet, our rightful place, they come and go from Earth as they please, whenever they have a need to do so, for example, we do know that they have removed water from our oceans and taken it to the Moon, they have conducted mining on Earth as well but in a much more conservative manner. They have a much different point of view when it concerns the Moon, they do not view it as being ours. They have blasted huge craters into the Moon's crust in order to expedite mining and have robbed the Moon of millions of tons of precious crystals that one day we might very well need ourselves.
There was an extensive initial meeting in Cuba between The Delta and The Project Utopia Committee, Codename Crown, in the early Spring of 1943. A measured amount of scientific technology was provided by The Delta in return for a solemn agreement that The Delta would remain unknown by the general population, that they had exclusive rights to the Moon and would not be interfered with at any time in the future and that Army Project Echo, that bounced radio signals off the Moon, would be canceled. Among the technology that was provided by the Delta was transistor technology and aerodynamic technology that eventually led to jet propulsion.
RJ said "And of course, he says at the end 'the universe put it there, or god did.' If he meant aliens, it's easy to say aliens. He didn't. His explanation if that it is there from natural processes"
God isn't a natural process. Buzz is obviously suggesting it is artificially constructed.
Still, if you folks are so dense you actually require Buzz to say it was put there by Aliens, go listen to the speech he gave on the USS Hornet... where he says just that!
The attending media assumed it was a joke, of course... but was it? Why is Buzz so obsessed with an insignificant looking 'rock' on Phobos, when there are much more scientifically interesting things both on Mars and the Moon? What does he know about this 'rock' that we don't?
It's a lot simpler that than. He says 'by the universe' for those who do not believe in god or can also believe in natural processes contributing to creation. He adds 'OR' god for those who are religiously inclined. In that view, it is also valid to say god created the universe. Its quite a stretch to say that equates to aliens creating the universe.
According to C-Span, Buzz's interview was an hour long. This clip was about a minute long. So he wasn't "obsessed" with this rock. He briefly mentioned it as an example of why NASA funding should be continued and support moon, Mars, and other space exploration: to respond to public curiosity.
RJ, your definition of Monolith is wrong.
Every definition I've read states it is a great stone which is *part* of a man-made construction (column, sculpture, building, or other architecture).
And after the movie "2001" it has become a loaded word. There is no reason for Mr. Aldrin to use that word, unless he suspects this stone is somehow important to mankind.
Definition from Merriam-Webster:
1 a single great stone often in the form of an obelisk or column
2 a massive structure
3 an organized whole that acts as a single unified powerful or influential force
I think Buzz was using a metaphor(though he could have picked better words) to say that we have no idea what's out there and that you never know, we might find some form of life out there someday eventually.
I agree he could have said what he meant better. There is something to be said for each point of view - but I think the only way to know what he meant, is for him to specifically clarify what he meant. Hopefully he will.
I can't believe that y'all missed this from almost 10 years ago!
just google "phobos monolith" and you'll see the photos that Buzz saw.
BillyJoSquire - I did point that out, but when you get to the bottom of the comments, you have to select "Next..." to see all the rest of the comments that discussed that.
To whom it may concern: bibliotecapleyades. net/ marte/marte_phobos05. htm Do you see the connection?
Stop watching 2001 odissey
I don't know anything about these Delta aliens,but if you want some evidence of activity on the Moon try the Mars Anomaly Research site.There is a section on the Moon with some spine-tingling photos.The analysis is very thorough, and Andy is right - the image tampering is all over yet doesn't obscure evrything.
How could Aldrin come out and say the Phobos monolith was put there by aliens? It's just too much politically.He couldn't possibly be suggesting a mission to look at some rock. Why have the Russians sent 2 probes to Phobos, if it's nothing but a 15- mile captured asteroid?
Stay away from there it does not belong to you.
Why do you think they call him "buzz". He smuggled a key of Humboldt County Wowee on his trip to the dark side. Anyway, I just watched Space Chimps and if there's any monoliths of any kind on the moon, well then, don't you think they'd have shown up during the filming sequences there?
Its probably an intergalactic warning sign informing highly intelligent alien species to stay clear of the third planet filled with hairless monkeytards that have little respect for each other or the planet they infest. Is it any wonder why we're located on the ass end of the galaxy?
Look at the picture, at his eyes. He looks like he knows a big secret--something that we don't know. The eyes are very revealing.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!