We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 49°F: Current condition: Mostly Cloudy See Extended Forecast

Why Methodist seminaries are becoming irrelevant and dying


The Cross and Flame symbol is the official logo of the United Methodist Church

[This article was written by Dr. Riley Case of The Confessing Movement within the United Methodist Church.  As a graduate of one of the top seminaries in the country, and one that has been removed from the list of approved UMC seminaries, Methodist Examiner James-Michael Smith WHOLEHEARTEDLY agrees with Dr. Case's assessment and urges Methodists everywhere to raise this issue with their Bishops, District Superintendents and Pastors.]

 --------------------------

These are tough times for church institutions and agencies.

Right across the board--progressive, evangelical, in the U.S. or overseas--church groups are struggling because of the economic recession. The Billy Graham Association is laying off 55 workers, or 10% of its staff. The Association's budget is being cut 15%, to about 84 million.

Christianity Today is shutting down four publications (it has 9 more still in operation) and laying off 31 (or 22%) of its staff. The Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA) is reducing its next year's budget by $5.6 million and has eliminated 23 jobs. Other staff salaries have reduced 3%. The Presbyterian Church (USA) has dropped 56 jobs since September of last year. The Friends Committee on National Legislation has cut 12 staffers. The Church of the Brethren has simply closed its Washington office.

As for United Methodists, the General Board of Global Ministries (GBGM) is reducing the 2009 operating budget by $3.9 million, or 7%, which will include cutting 17 staff positions. The Publishing House has indicated it will not be able to donate the $1 million to annual conferences for pastors' pensions. The Board of Discipleship (GBOD) has laid off 30 employees since January. The bishops have voted to roll back their salaries in 2010 to 2008 levels, from $125,658 to $120,942.

Annual conferences are facing similar cut-backs. Clergy pensions and retired clergy health benefits are facing deductions. Local churches are eliminating staff positions.

United Methodism's seminaries (and indeed, seminaries of all traditions) are also facing budgeting problems. While some seminaries are well endowed, the endowments are themselves suffering as the result of falling stock markets. In this climate it is time to ask the tough (actually it shouldn't be such a tough question since the answer would seem obvious) question: does The United Methodist Church have too many seminaries?

Forty years ago, at the time of the Methodist-EUB merger, the newly formed United Methodist Church declared that the combined fourteen seminaries of the new denomination were too many and not well located to be effective. The General Conference mandated (or at least strongly recommended) at least two mergers. One merger did take place: Evangelical Seminary merged with Garrett Biblical Institute to form Garrett Evangelical Theological Seminary. The other logical merger, United (former EUB) in Dayton, and METHESCO, in Delaware, Ohio, never took place.

Because there were too many seminaries chasing too few students, the seminaries made urgent pleas for help. The church responded by establishing the Ministerial Education Fund in 1972, a "bail-out" fund before the term "bail-out" was widely used. The fund would subsidize US seminaries (but do nothing for overseas seminaries where the help was really needed) to the tune of $15 million a year. This means that over the 40-year period since 1970 the church has poured $600 million into the seminaries.

Since the merger The United Methodist Church has lost 3 million members. Despite the loss of 27% of its membership there has been no reduction in the number of seminaries to serve the smaller denomination. Enrollment has plummeted in many of the seminaries. At Garrett Evangelical, there were 73 graduates in the 2009 class. Fifty years ago (before the merger) Garrett alone graduated 153.

One of the unfortunate by-products of this pressure to keep the seminaries viable has been the effort to force students to attend these United Methodist seminaries. Numbers of excellent seminaries, where students would prefer to attend, have been disapproved for the training of United Methodist seminaries in an effort to force students to attend United Methodist seminaries.

There is a further question as to whether these seminaries are really serving the church. Claremont School of Theology was put on probation in 2006 by the Association of Theological Schools, and in danger of losing accreditation because of continual bleeding red ink. The school has recently announced, with great fanfare, that its financial house is now in order. Not only that but, thanks to a $5 million gift by an anonymous donor, it is transforming itself into a "multifaith university," with a new vision and a new mission statement and a new set of values.

The new vision and new mission statement and new set of values say nothing about Jesus Christ, nothing about preparing pastors, nothing about United Methodism, nothing about theology or Biblical studies, and nothing about the Christian Church. The statements stress preparing "leaders" for an increasingly diverse, multi-faith world. As evidence of what the seminary is all about, a Muslim graduate of the class of 2009 read from the Koran at the graduation ceremonies.

Claremont can obviously do what it wants to do. But does The United Methodist Church need continually to pour $1 million yearly into such an institution? Isn't The United Methodist Church supposed to be something about winning disciples to Jesus Christ?

The University Senate while disapproving numbers of excellent seminaries because they do not "reflect United Methodist ethos" evidently feels that Claremont does reflect "United Methodist ethos." It is a strange understanding of United Methodist ethos.

So the question remains. Does The United Methodist Church have too many seminaries? The church downsizes programs and personnel; when will it begin to downsize the total number of seminaries?

 

 ---------------------------------------

Thanks to Rev. Talbot Davis and Rev. John Wesley Slider for bringing this article to my attention.  -JMS

For more info on the state of the UMC I recommend: 
The Confessing Movement - www.confessingumc.org
Good News Magazine - www.goodnewsmag.org
Advertisement

By

Methodist Examiner

James-Michael, or JM as his friends call him, received his M.Div from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary and served for 5 years as Discipleship...

Comments

  • Daniel Berryhill 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    As a methodist attending a great seminary that has been cut from the list I couldn't agree more.

    I think you could write a whole series of articles on the ways that Methodism today is beginning to stray from the ideals and opinions of Wesley and the "Methodists".

    There's a part of me that hates tithing to the methodist church because I know that some percent of that money will go toward the bureaucracy and policy-makers who come up with stuff like this (when there are so many great charities out there). After reading this I need to re-think my position...maybe I'm just being unfairly withholding.

    What I really need to do is come up with FOUR million dollars to bribe that seminary back to the conservative side. :)

    ta for now...

  • Andrew _Roanoke Orthodox Christian Examiner 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    James, this was certainly an interesting article. I am still a little confused about what is actually happening in Methodist seminaries. Are they no longer teaching authentic Christian doctrines? Does it have to do with a lack of ministers to replace the old ones? In your opinion when would you say the decline started and what do you think some of the factors could be?

  • James-Michael 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Andrew,
    Basically, with the exception of a very few, UM seminaries followed the trend of Liberal Protestant theology the arose in the 19th-20th centuries and abandoned orthodox views of key doctrines such as the Inspiration of Scripture, the Atonement, the Virgin Conception, etc. As a result the Denomination's overall leadership became increasingly theologically liberal. Thus, schools that are Evangelical and hold to things like the Inspiration and Authority of Scripture are deemed "fundamentalist" by many in UM leadership and were dropped from the approved list. However, schools that abandoned doctrinal orthodoxy, such as the one mentioned in the article, are seen as open, tolerant and acceptable by the same leaders because they're not "fundamentalist."

    But the kicker is that these open, tolerant, pluralistic seminaries are dying because people called to ministry by God are refusing to go to such schools and instead opting for doctrinally-sound places like Asbury and GCTS.

  • John Rivera 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    "The University Senate while disapproving numbers of excellent seminaries because they do not "reflect United Methodist ethos" evidently feels that Claremont does reflect "United Methodist ethos." It is a strange understanding of United Methodist ethos."

    We should start a petition to have Asbury Theological Seminary (and other doctrinally sound seminaries) listed as approved UMC seminaries.

  • Gman 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Guy's, Thank you for your honesty. This "phenomenon" is not only evident in the Methodist Church but allot of the other "mainline" churches.
    What started out as a great movement has sadly become a nothing but a monument.
    One hymn comes to mind that is
    "Breath upon ME breath of GOD."

    Where are the John Wesley's of this era to take stand a stand against religiosity and allow the HOLY SPIRIT back into our churches.

    Forgive me if I come across .......

  • Angelo Sadorra_(UMC Philippines) 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    as a major protestant denomination, the United Methodist Church must maintain its private piety of seminaries. i urge to all clergy specially those who hold high offices to think about the movements of the church. in the broader sense, we must not stake our christian-wesleyan heritage for the seminarians to understand the other faiths. it is ecumenical in sense and social in purpose!
    My dear beothers aand sisters in Christ, i understand that you just like to open our future clergies into a present day situations but it is not practical for us to do such....To God be the Glory!

  • Rich Buckley 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Disappointingly, the above article does offer any foundational reasons "why Methodist seminaries are becoming irrelevant and dying." Rather, it offers only empirical evidence, while valid, does not enlighten the reader. As a life long Methodist I find the Vatican's recent release on "New Age" (h t t p : // tinyurl.com/5bgg) is a worth while investment of time to gain a deeper understanding of "why."

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...