Global warming hypothesis falsified by data: "Climategate" e-mails expose carbon tax rip-off

We hold these Truths to be self-evident...

Global temperatures have declined since 1998 (and here) while carbon emissions have risen, undermining the scientific argument for global warming. Now, the public release of thousands of internal e-mails hacked from University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) reveal data was changed in order to fit the model of global warming and support a global carbon tax and trade. This, suspiciously after CRU claimed to have lost or destroyed the data that would allow independent verification of CRU's claims.

Initial planning of the tax would cost Americans ~$100 billion every year, an average of ~$1,000 per each household's $50,000 annual income.

CRU supplied climate data that was the leading foundation of the UN’s IPCC report concluding "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal." The IPCC report is the foundation of the Copenhagen Climate Conference, where nations will discuss reduction and taxing of carbon emissions in order to slow the alleged unequivocal warming.

Opponents assert the hypothesis of global warming is falsified from declining earth temperatures since 1998, sun activity as the driving cause of temperature change confirmed with temperature increases on our solar system’s other planets, a medieval warm period of 500 years that became a little ice age independent of human activity, that human causes of carbon dioxide emissions account for far less than 1% of the total, and that arctic sea ice has grown from 2007 (and here). Carbon dioxide is the gas most contributing to reflecting heat within earth’s atmosphere (information, documentation and data here, here, here, and here).

The following 12-minute interview of Alex Jones explains and shows that independent university measurements were accurate and “official” data was fraudulent (and here). The hacked e-mails reveal the data was contrived. The global carbon tax would also be a new exotic derivative that would increase consumer prices. People within the US government are complicit in possible criminal fraud; members of Congress are initiating investigation. Other counties' legislators are also responding; Australia here.

The revealed e-mails show that a primary author of the IPCC report calling for human-cause carbon reduction, Kevin Trenberth, states clearly to his colleague Tom Wigley (e-mail Oct. 14, 2009) that he doesn’t know what the role of human carbon emissions is, in stark contrast to his official report of certainty to reduce them or face global disaster:

How come you do not agree with a statement that says we are no where close to knowing where energy is going or whether clouds are changing to make the planet brighter. We are not close to balancing the energy budget. The fact that we can not account for what is happening in the climate system makes any consideration of geoengineering quite hopeless as we will never be able to tell if it is successful or not! It is a travesty!

An example of data that was egregiously changed:

At the insistence of editors of the Royal Society's Philosophical Transactions B the data has leaked into the open - and Yamal's mystery is no more.

From this we know that the Yamal data set uses just 12 trees from a larger set to produce its dramatic recent trend. Yet many more were cored, and a larger data set (of 34) from the vicinity shows no dramatic recent warming, and warmer temperatures in the middle ages.

In all there are 252 cores in the CRU Yamal data set, of which ten were alive 1990. All 12 cores selected show strong growth since the mid-19th century. The implication is clear: the dozen were cherry-picked.

More damning e-mail content is here.

CRU head of research, Dr. Phil Jones, confirmed the leaked e-mails are authentic. E-mail discussions included how to discredit scientists whose data challenged CRU’s conclusions, hiding the decline in global temperatures over the last 11 years, blocking research other than in agreement with their conclusions from of peer-reviewed journals, and the actual programming codes to fraudulently change data to show temperatures higher than actual readings.

In short, CRU’s e-mails show that they were lying in every way necessary to sell their conclusion in support of a global carbon tax.

For analysis from Ian Plimer, best-selling author countering alleged global warming data, go here. Climatologist Dr. Tim Ball explains the fraudulent manipulation of data here. New Zealand's Science Climate Coalition, here. Cost of proposed carbon tax in Japan, here.

Below is House Committee testimony of Al Gore denying any data that contradicted the basis for a global carbon tax that would cost Americans hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes. His deceptive rhetoric speaks for itself. Another great summary video follows.

Expect heavy spin for damage control from the "mainstream" media that so brutally lied to justify and cover US Wars of Aggression. Expect the same confusion of reporting and political rhetoric you experienced from the so-called "bailout" that transfers TRILLIONS of taxpayer dollars to financial elite. The last video shows the type of reporting you can expect.

This is another example of the need for Truth and Reconciliation to peel-off those involved to break-open all areas of criminal and harmful actions of our government. Those involved willing to have a “Scrooge conversion” can provide powerful information to disclose and end these actions harmful to humanity. Until such time, I encourage men and women in military, government, and law enforcement to use all their legal authority to lawfully refuse and stop illegal orders and acts.

As always, please share this article with all who can benefit. If you appreciate my work, please subscribe by clicking under the title (it’s free). Please peruse my archive of articles for your use in building a brighter future.