We think you're near Phoenix

Currently in Phoenix

Location: Phoenix Current temperature: 56°F: Current condition: Partly Cloudy See Extended Forecast

Is Microsoft showing some hypocrisy with gamer gun flap?

   Microsoft, that Redmond-based multi-billion-dollar software giant, is in the middle of a flap amongst video game aficionados because of a restriction that reportedly takes effect Jan. 1 that prohibits video game players from arming their avatars with anything that looks like a gun.

   This controversy erupted after a writer with PCMag.com reported this:

You can shoot your friends with all sorts of awesome and painful weaponry across Microsoft's Xbox Live service; you just can't give your virtual representation a digital gun—that's a no-no.—David Murphy, PCMag.com

   That’s not going down too well with devoted video game players, including one close to this column, who matter-of-factly note that many if not most video games available on the Xbox platform involve some kind of shooting, often via what our source called a “first person shooter” type scenario. That is, the video game begins and you’re looking at the screen over the sights of some kind of gun, blasting away at assorted combatants or other targets to rack up a score.

Advertisement

   Whether one is doing a hunting game, or some other kind of video endeavor, there’s more than a little marksmanship involved. Microsoft apparently makes a lot of money from the Xbox Live stuff, whether it is a hunting or target shooting game or one of the more mature games available with combat scenarios. Millions of people have a lot of fun playing these games, with no harm resulting.

   Even if the Xbox games were limited to blasting away at video images of clay birds, it’s still a game of shooting and marksmanship, our source acknowledged. 

   So, with all of that out there, what’s up with Microsoft – a company that allows its employees to belong to the Microsoft Gun Club – not allowing players to display any gun facsimile with their avatar personas, some people are wondering.

We should note, however, that the alleged policy does indeed only refer to gun-like weaponry. Xbox Live avatars will still be able to swing lightsabers around all they want, for example—ignoring the fact that a blade of superheated plasma could do just as much damage as a digital bullet or chainsaw attachment.—David Murphy

   This is stirring a bit of discussion among gamers, and it is likely to spill over into the firearms community. Not only is PCMag talking about it, but so is TechSpot, with this explanation:

Microsoft debuted Avatars in November 2008 as a way to visually represent a gamer using a cartoon-like character. Users are able to fully customize their Avatar by adjusting attributes like height, weight, skin color and hair style. Players can earn new Avatar accessories by completing in-game achievements or purchase them with real-world money through the Avatar Marketplace which was launched in August 2009.

One could argue that first person shooters and games that include guns like Call of Duty, Halo, Grand Theft Auto and Gears of War were key to Microsoft’s console success, thus it seems a bit unusual that Redmond is suddenly turning all family-friendly. But as TG Daily points out, the deciding factor here is likely the fact that Avatars are universal, meaning that your Avatar shows up regardless of what game you are playing. Halo gamers might expect to see a gun-toting Avatar but someone playing Kinect Sports might not.—Shawn Knight TechSpot

   Other coverage is appearing today at DigitalTrends and WindowsITPro.

   Over the years, ever since Columbine, the influence of so-called “violent video games” may have had on young mass shooters has been debated ad nauseum.

   One must keep this in perspective: Millions of people, including adults well beyond the “twenty-something” stage, play these games and they have harmed nobody. It’s like the New York Times making a big deal about a relative handful of people with concealed carry licenses who commit crimes; hardly are they representative of the more than 6.2 million armed citizens who are licensed to carry, and who haven’t shot anybody.

   Microsoft’s restriction seems a bit disingenuous, if not downright hypocritical to a lot of people.

 

 

PLEASE FORWARD the link to this column and share with all of your chat lists and forums

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE by clicking on the link above

 

 

 

And Don’t forget to visit:

 

KeepAndBearArms.com

GunVoter.org

OpenCarry.org

GunDigest.com

Hunting-Washington.com

HuntFishNW.com

GunnersLair.com

TheHighRoad.org

Northwest Firearms.com

GunRightsMedia.com

WaGuns.org 

Defensive Carry.com

SeattleGuns.net

ShootersNorthwest.com

Gun-Politics.org

VISIT THESE GUN RIGHTS EXAMINERS ON-LINE:

Atlanta Ed Stone | Austin Howard Nemerov | Boston Ron Bokleman | Charlotte Paul Valone | Cheyenne Anthony Bouchard | Chicago Don Gwinn | Cleveland Daniel White | DC Mike Stollenwerk | Denver Dan Bidstrup | Des Moines Sean McClanahan |Detroit Rob Reed | Fort Smith Steve D. Jones | Knoxville Liston Matthews | Los Angeles John Longenecker | Minneapolis John Pierce | National David Codrea | Seattle  Dave Workman | St. Louis Kurt Hofmann | Tucson Chris Woodard | Oakland Yih-Chau Chang | Gaithersburg Gary Roehm

 

 

 ALSO VISIT:

SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION

‘Winning Firearms Freedom One Lawsuit at a Time’

CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS

 

READ:

America Fights Back: Armed Self-Defense in a Violent Age

These Dogs Don’t Hunt: The Democrats’ War on Guns

Assault on Weapons: The Campaign to Eliminate Your Guns

Shooting Blanks: Facts Don’t Matter to the Gun Ban Crowd

Washington State Gun Rights and Responsibilities

By

Seattle Gun Rights Examiner

Dave Workman is an author, senior editor of Gun Week, communications director for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, award...

Don't miss...