FIGURE D - R. Stewart: Jan. 21 NASA image (UFO at red)
Breakthroughs in new imaging technology developed by the firm of Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck may now permit human observers to identify what appear to be planet-sized extraterrestrial UFOs exiting from dimensional portals in the Sun (See images and slideshow in article below). A giant solar UFO wave commenced January 18, 2010, as predicted by the singularity theory of physicist Nassim Haramein that postulates that planet-sized UFOs access our solar system using the Sun as a star gate.
Images of the Sun taken by NASA Stereo spacecraft independently on January 21, 2010 and again on January 23, 2010 were submitted by this Examiner.com reporter to a demonstration test using this new proprietary imaging technology. The resulting images and analysis arguably visually confirm the existence of extraterrestrial or interdimensional giant UFOs exiting from what the images show as portals or tunnels on the Sun, in both sets of images from independent NASA Stereo photos dated Jan. 21 and 23, 2010, respectively. These results were released by the Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck firm in a report, parts 1 and 2 dated February 2 and 3, 2010.
According to communications with this reporter from film director Jose Escamilla and Mike Bird, director of Exopolitics Canada, NASA has acted to remove Stereo images of the Sun containing giant UFOs from their website. Dr. Joe Gurman, NASA Stereo Project scientist, stated the giant solar UFOs are “compression artifacts”. The images derived by the Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck imaging technology appear to demonstrate that planet-sized extraterrestrial or interdimensional UFOs can be identified in these images as entering and exiting from dimensional portals in the Sun.
NASA appears, by the weight of prima facie visual evidence, to have been engaged in yet another cover-up of intelligent extraterrestrial life in our solar system, contrary to its mandate under the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958.
FIGURE E -Stewart: UFO from Fig. D leaves tunnel (1)
Breakthrough imaging technology and physicist Nassim Haramein
In a taped lecture on a previous solar UFO wave, physicist Nassim Haramein posited the giant solar UFOs as extraterrestrial craft accessing our solar system via the black hole or dimensional portal of our Sun, as his singularity theory predicted.
Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck approached Mr. Haramein’s staff prior to his Feb. 3, 2010 public remarks on a Coast-to-Coast radio program with copies of the two new imaging technology reports on solar UFOs. Mr. Haramein has yet to be reached for public comment on the two reports. On Feb. 3 program Mr. Haramein noted that “‘there is activity around the sun that can't easily be explained by conventional means,’ yet it's difficult to make distinctions between camera artifacts and anomalous objects.”
Methodology: Visible images of planet-sized solar UFOs
In a preface to Part 1 of the two reports on the giant solar UFO images, inventor Ron Stewart states, “The author of this document and inventor of a new imaging process that has the capability of enhancing inconclusive photos and images of just about any image of an inconclusive tangible object with a success rate of about 90%. This new imaging process the author has invented has numerous capabilities, which at this time may even be beyond what NASA can produce in such images as well. It even has the capability to extract areas in an image as small as (or smaller) than the eye of a needle.”
Demonstration test #1 – January 23, 2010 Stereo images of the Sun
The first demonstration of the new image enhancing technology, done on solar images taken by NASA’s Stereo spacecraft on January 23, 2010 did not at first yield any images of a planet-sized UFO. Mr. Ron Stewart of the firm of Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck first analyzed 3 images of the Sun taken by NASA’s Stereo spacecraft on January 23, 2010 and downloaded by Mike Bird of Exopolitics Canada from NASA’s website prior to their being taken down by NASA. These 3 solar images can be seen as Figures A, B, and C in this reporter’s prior Examiner.com article.
According to Part 1 of Mr. Stewart’s report (pages 1-8), “In Figures A – C, this author examined all three of these images and did not find/observe any anomaly that may be of a planet sized orientation to suggest yet any planet sized UFOs at that point.”
Demonstration test #2 - Evidence for possible planet-sized UFOs in the Sun’s corona
In demonstration test #2 of the new imaging technology, inventor Ron Stewart begins with Figure D (above), a NASA Stereo image of the Sun taken January 21, 2010. The imaging technology then enhances sections of Figure D to arrive at Figure E (above). In Figure E, the image appears to show a UFO-like object emerging from a dark tunnel. The imaging technology then enhances Figure E into Figure F (below), which appears to show one UFO-like object emerging from the dark tunnel, followed by another possible UFO-like object. This sequence of enhanced imagery appears to conform to singularity theory holding that giant ET UFOs may access our solar system using the Sun as a dimensional portal. The full sequence of images can be seen in Part 1 of the report. (Click here to download Parts 1 and 2 of the Stewart/Nussbeck report [PDF]).
Demonstration test #2 of the new imaging technology was done on an image of the Sun (Figure D above) taken by NASA’s Stereo spaceship on January 21, 2010, as set out in a YouTube video analysed in a prior Examiner.com article.
Figure D (above)
Mr. Stewart examined the NASA Stereo spacecraft image of the Sun set out in Figure D (above), stating (Report Part 1, page 9),
Figure D - “The image above is important. For it is here we start to see the first strong suggestive evidence of these possible planet sized UFOs. In the You-Tube video at about 36:00 seconds into the video above in this image where the red arrow points.... The turquoise arrow points (where at this point in viewing the images the other possible planet sized UFOs are too small for you to see)...to other possible planet sized UFOs in the generalized area where the turquoise arrow points to.”
Figure E (above)
The imaging technology was used to derive Figure E from a section of Figure D. Mr. Stewart states about Figure E (Report, Part 1, page 14):
Figure E – “The first possible planet-sized UFO is enlarged again. However, what is important here is the old saying "Things are not always as they appear” What you see here is not as it truly appears. The dark area [around the number "1"] is not really part of this possible planet-sized UFO. If not, what is it? Rather, in theory and hypothesis the photographic evidence on continuing pages will show this dark spot to be a possible 'deep sort of tunnel in which these possible planet sized UFOs are coming through.' (1) is actually part of the first possible planet sized UFO.”
.jpg)
Figure F (Left)
Figure E is then enhanced using the imaging technology to derive Figure F. Inventor Ron Stewart states (Report Part 1, page 18),
Figure F- “In the image above the yellow arrow points to the possible planet sized UFO entrance. The red arrow points to what may be another possible planet sized alien ship as it appears maybe half-way through this possible tunnel area.”
Demonstration test #3 – “the most important photographs ever, showing these UFO's accessing our Sun.”
In a February 4, 2010 telephone conversation between inventor Ron Stewart and this reporter, Mr. Stewart indicated that he thought there were giant solar UFOs in the NASA Stereo images dated January 23, 2010. These were Stereo images of the Sun downloaded from the NASA website before NASA had removed them.
On February 6, 2010, the firm of Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck emailed this reporter as well as the offices of physicist Nassim Haramein the results of Demonstration test #3, in the form of enhanced images from the Jan. 23, 2010 Stereo image of the Sun.
For ease of viewing, 11 of these images, derived from a NASA Stereo photograph of the Sun dated Jan. 23, 2010, are included in a slide show accompanying this article (See below).
Ron Stewart and Ron Nussbeck stated in an email dated Feb. 6, 2010 to the staff of physicist Nassim Haramein and to this reporter, “The images [in the slideshow] were extracted from NASA's Jan, 23, 2010 Stereo image. The photographs show conclusively that the UFO's are still in the image but fainter than the Jan. 18, 2010 images. The reason for this was obvious once we looked closely at the images, low resolution. If you measure the DPI in each photo you will see that we have increased its level allowing high-resolution images to be obtained and clearly the imaging of the UFO's. The last photo is a close up of the top of the craft showing intelligent design, this maybe the most important photographs ever, showing these UFO's accessing our Sun.” [Emphasis added]
What are the implications of these new enhanced images of giant solar UFOs around the Sun?
1. Imaging technology - Invention of new technology by the firm of Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck appears to process NASA’s Stereo spacecraft images of the Sun and create prima facie evidence of planet-sized extraterrestrial or interdimensional UFOs accessing our solar system using the Sun as a star gate.
2. Independent demonstration of UFOs and tunnels on our Sun – The new imaging technology has now demonstrated the existence of what appear to be planet-sized UFOs emerging from tunnels on our Sun in two independent demonstrations, based on separate NASA Stereo photos taken Jan. 21, and Jan. 23, 2010.
3. Freedom of Information – U.S. citizens and taxpayers, as well as the world community, are entitled to the full information and knowledge provided in NASA Stereo of the Sun as set out in the provisions of the U.S. National Aeronautic and Space Act of 1958, which provides (inter alia) that “it is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.”
4. NASA’s actions contrary to the U.S. National Aeronautic and Space Act of 1958 – NASA appears to be taking down valid Stereo spacecraft images of the Sun containing giant solar UFOs, in contravention of its mandate under the U.S. National Aeronautic and Space Act of 1958. Criminal prosecution by the U.S. Department of Justice is in order.
5. NASA’s official statements contrary to the National Aeronautic and Space Act of 1958 – NASA officials such as those of Dr. Joe Gurman, NASA Stereo Project scientist, stating that the giant solar UFOs are “compression artifacts” are non-tenable and may be in intentional aid of a criminal racketeering (RICO) conspiracy to violate the National Aeronautic and Space Act of 1958. Criminal prosecution by the U.S. Department of Justice is in order.
6. Quantum physics now can explain giant solar UFOs – Nassim Haramein’s singularity theory offers a plausible, science-based explanation of giant solar UFOs, which use the star gate of our Sun to access our solar system from interdimensional reality.
7. The January 18, 2010 solar UFO wave constitutes a disclosure of their presence by extraterrestrials – By entering our solar system through the Sun’s star gate and being monitored and recorded by NASA’s Stereo spacecraft, extraterrestrial (interdimensional) civilizations have de facto disclosed their presence in space ships as large as the Earth.
8. Earth-sized solar UFO spaceships accessing the solar system through the star gate of a Sun that Earth has made subject to the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 (Article II), which provides that “Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.”
9. Earth-sized solar UFO spaceships accessing the solar system through the star gate of the Sun appear to have the capability to render emergency assistance to (or socio-political domination of) our human population, if need be. Such an intervention would violate a universal law of non-intervention. – See: 2012 may bring the “perfect storm” – solar flares, systems collapse
10. Citizen disclosure – The evidence to date appears to demonstrate that citizen-driven extraterrestrial and inter-dimensional disclosure initiatives (including citizen whistleblowers) are perhaps a sole source of authentic disclosure. The disclosures by citizen inventors Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck of close-up images of giant solar UFOs, exposing NASA’s cover-up in the case of Stereo spacecraft images are the latest case in point.
11. Exopolitical infrastructure - Human society lacks a transparent, interactive exopolitical infrastructure for open and mutual relations with the intelligent civilizations that may be accessing our solar system through the star gate of the Sun. This is the legacy of the 1953 U.S. CIA Robertson Panel, which created a slimate of public discourse around the extraterrestrial presence driven by ridicule. Allowing an effective human exopolitical infrastructure to flourish after years of a truth embarg is a singular priority.
Editorial caveat: In undertaking the evaluations necessary for this Examiner.com article, this reporter had access to the Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck Report Parts 1 and 2, and interviewed inventor Ron Stewart on Friday Feb. 6, 2010. This reporter is not responsible for errors of analysis, grammar and syntax in the Stewart/Nussbeck report and has no organizational connection to the Stewart/Nussbeck firm. Mr. Stewart’s contact information is available on the cover of the Report. Mr. Stewart stated he welcomes queries about his imaging technology and findings. March 22, 2010 Update: The 1 video in this article has been removed by the Youtube user without notice to this reporter and without cause. Hence, readers may rely only on the 3 photographic images and the slideshow in this article in evaluating the conclusions proffered by the Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck firm.
|
Note: Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original. This article is copyright © and should not be added in its entirity on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com |
Comments
The article was well written with great photos, the fact that I could enlarge the images using the PDF documents pull down bar made it easy to look closely.. This was a great idea... This might well be the best article I have ever read on UFO's and it makes sense that ET is traveling using this type of technology. Is there more on this subject?
I'm sorry but Ron Nussbeck has yet to prove his photographic techniques work. He has never had any of it subjected to peer review. If and when that happens let me know. Until then everything pertaining to his work is totally subjective and without merit.
I have seen Ron's work in the past and it has been tested and certified by photograpic experts, this has been posted repeatedly in articles in the past. In every test the photographic process has exceeded all current technology with certifications. I think the Nobel should be awarded to Ron.
I have also seen the certifications on this photograpic process of Mr. Nussbeck's. One of which was a expert who works for police departs and who presents testimony in court as a forensic photography expert. He said the process goes beyond anything his equipment could do and certified it. I am very impressed with another certification by a Computer Graphics Engineer who said he tested and certified the process and that it could be the most improtant new technology that touches nearly everones life. I found the article to be imformative, very well done.
It is an incredible discovery and prooves again that the public is being deceived by the Elite controlled gov bodies. It`s just like Climategate, Flu scam and the bogus War on Terror (9/11)
For a lot of folks reading this, it may be a shock to discover what is going on and are looking for vital information, but don’t know where to go to learn the truth, knowing the lies from NASA and our “government” puppets of the NSA & Fed Reserve have stolen trillions from us, kept free energy from us for over 70 years. Check out YouTube Channel for Project Camelot, and watch the Richard C Hogland videos, Bob Dean & David Wilcock videos. Also, watch all National Disclosure Project videos & visit the Orion Project to involve yourself politically. Concerning the UFOs around the sun, it’s all speculation, but isn’t fun to speculate? Maybe these are a giant pico-wave dampening network of ships and planetoids, and will help Earth through the transition upon us from the dark rift alignment. The polar shift may still occur, but maybe these ships are here to lessen the effects from pico waves, but now the earth must be cleansed by water, and will let this occur. Only time will tell.
If we support the scientist who are working to find the answers to what the planet size UFO's are doing accessing our Sun we can get answers, if we fail to support them this story will be over. There is little doubt that UFO's are accessing our Sun and many images show them since jan, 2010. Send this article to everyone...
HOLY MOLY! What is this, the Weekly World News? I thought I was on a legitimate news site?
Ever hear of sun spots?
Once again we see another reason why Nasa and our leaders should be arrested and face charges of TREASON. These are in fact ships, and there is an ongoing cover-up. Sun spots my arse!
Better put on your best white shirt- Looks maybe, like we MIGHT have some bright company coming for a visit now.Guess they can take the heat WITHOUT MELTING : ) ****
Ourstanding article, facts, photos and scientists who speak freely... I commend the author, great journalism.
Somebody needs to get back on their meds. OMG you people who believe this stuff can't be serious. Here let me hand you a tinfoil hat. LOL
This has been debunked. Creation of the artefacts have been replicated through simple image processing. See
adammcravenzen . wordpress . com / 2010 / 02 / 08 /nasa-cover-up-part-3-no-cover-up
These images in the PDF documents 1-2 show a step X step process from the previous image to the next one, where more detail and improvement can be seen to different degrees of improvement should be self-evident.It seems that the imaging process is trying to be presented this way to present and open and forthright visual aid as possible . So, that what is stated in observations can equally be verified by what is seen in the enhanced images as well.
Some previous comment state Mr. Nussbeck has not had the photographic techniques subjected to peer review. In order to do this than Mr. Nussbeck on the inventor of this process Mr. Ron Stewart, would 'have to divulge exactly how the process works to these'peers'. Therefore, revealing exactly how it works. Duplicating it to see for themselves. However, what is the problem with that? It becomes known, anyone could use it. Taking away Mr. Stewart's 'Intellectual Property Rights'.Guaranteed by The US Constitution to everyone fairly and justly.
The PDF documents are the perfect visual aid to view UFO's and gives the reader the ability to enlarge them using the pull down bar. As far as Mr. Nussbeck's process is concerned I have personally verifed two independent researchers tests in previous articles, bothe experts certified his process with high prase. In fact, both thought the process could effect everyone on the planet in some way. You will always have debunkers who won't accept even experts certifications. I love the article Alfred, you really hit a home run with this one!
For me, this is a note worthy article that could bring about disclosure. Please continue to update us on this work.
I would put all my fiat money on the idea that these are very, VERY large asteroids... UFO's, yes, but not the creature kind. We are moving into the infamous "dark rift", a dust cloud with objects that possibly surpass our imagination. "The moon turned red, and the Sun appeared as black as sackcloth". That sounds like a dust cloud to me, how about you? Expect to see many, MANY more meteors and asteroids in the next few years to come!
Would someone tell me why the resolution is so poor.Given that I can obtain and have seen VASTLY superior resolution from terrestrial sunscopes, why has the NASA stereo scope been unable to match much more pedestrian equipment.In regards to UFO's why are the shots usually so blury. I would expect if these beings are 300,000 years more advanced than us, then we hold little value to them in any way at all.I wont say the gap is as great as Gorilla vs. Man (probably bigger), however you get the point.
Very nice article. Not compression artifacts nor issue of image processing, if that was the case they would not have removed the images! For those who are ignorant or cannot see beyond die hard fanatical skepticism, NASA has removed, altered, updated and air-brushed more images than most could wrap their head around. They dropped the ball on this one and missed it. They are only human. They updated their 'slips.' Plausible deniability is intact since their original images were removed. Nay sayers believe what you will that isn't going to change for some even if a UFO landed on the White House lawn. The inevitable disclosure that so many other countries already have accepted will soon be at hand for those in the USA. Don't panic.
Notice last modified time stamps if your the 'skeptical enquirer' types. Think they fixed those images for your pleasure? Do you really? Look outside the myopic boxes you hide in.
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov-browse-2010-01-21-behind-euvi-195-
Sol - "put all my fiat money on the idea that these are very, VERY large asteroids." Really well you would have lost it. Asteroids or comets of at those ranges I would think would be sucked in by the nearly inescapable gravity well of the sun very swiftly unless of course there is a very large and constant influx of incomming earth-size asteroids on those groupings of frames at that given time or unless this is continually and routinally happening multiple times a day with mega-asteroids. If your right we should be more worried about extinction by Near Earth Objects (NEO) since there should be lots of killer ones not so far off. Good luck to us all then since we are overdue anyhow on the cosmic random chance clock. I was wondering why you would want a Fiat of all vehicular abominations. Maybe you meant that sarcastically but I'm not sure. ;)
I truly support your efforts but this article is somewhat unreadable. I will not be able to forward this to others because I know it will create more questions than answers, which causes new learners to become uninterested. It is very important to communicate in ways that all will understand.
This is extremely important information and the article must be rewritten.
ALIENS ARE COMMING TO SLAY US ALL HIDE THE BEAR
2012 is comming early
retards
it's 2012 the end is coming!. By the way i need 25 bucks. SAVE YOURSELFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great Job!, the photographic work by Nussbeck is excellent, by far the best I have ever seen. The article it's self is a winner, love it...........
Please follow up on this article with more information. I agree with the previous post, great photography that leaves one wanting more.
The Rons discovered photoshop, you cannot with take a handful of pixels from a low resolution image and morph it until satisfied that it looks like a starship and then scream ET UFO!!! ET UFO!!!
These people are trying to discredit the honest work being done to discover what these really are and what they WILL MEAN TO HUMANITY. Nasa has made attempts with censorship to quiet this discussion and with statements that what we have seen is cosmic radiation interacting with the cameras, yet TODAY launched via the space shuttle a new HD 1080p probe to watch and study the sun. They know enough to spend $$$BIG$$$ to look into these goings on. Don't let people trick you into dismissing the truth with the images referenced in this article, because they will be discredited.
The previous poster is dead wrong! I have checked the photos by Ron Nussbeck in the NASA Stereo images have ever increasing amounts of DPI that is verifiable using DPI measuring tools. The last images contain as much as 3000 DPI, no one has produced this high of consentration DPI in images that I know of to date other than Ron Nussbeck. The pervious poster is either a liar or a fake and clearly does not know what he is talking about.
At least he can SPELL, oh great imaging sage.
Of course, I just took a 300 dpi jpeg and converted it to 3,000 dpi in Photoshop in about 10 seconds - ups the number of pixels by a power of magnitude BUT IT DOESN'T INCREASE THE ACTUAL INFORMATION IN THE IMAGE.
If it ain't there to begin with, anything you 'enhance' is an artifact of the enhancement algorithm.
I went into this subject with a crtical mind, hoping to disprove or explain these anomolies
Interestingly I recently found that NASA has even got a webpage up explaining these "anomolies" are compression artifacts and "Cosmic ray interference" on the images .....However if these are simple "artifacts and cosmic ray disturbances" as NASA has stated.... Why on earth would they have removed all the pictures from their website?
Such behaviour is known as acting on guilt, and is evidence that NASA is attempting to cover up something. Had they not "hidden" this material, it would not have been as suspicious as it is currently.
Snark, I gonna call B.S. on this 300 to 3000 dpi increase in photoshop. I have used photoshop for 8 years, can't be done, you may B.S. the others here but not the one's in the know. As far as the process used to create the images in this artilce, it's not photoshop, photozoom or aftereffect, it's and manual system. The reason I know for certain is I have read the background on these guys, there very smart. The process uses pixel compression in matrix and recombines the dpi. They then re-calibrate the image and compress the image further until they are ready to enhance the image. A very well known photographic expert put it simply, "there is nothing like it on the planet".
It is impossible to be anomolies" or compression artifacts or "Cosmic ray interference based on NASA's own evidence. On 1/18/10 NASA's Stereo image showed the ufo's, on 1/24/10 NASA posted Stereo images without ufo's. The problem was the 1/24/10 images were of low resolution but the ufo's were still there and could be seen once the resolution was increased using this new process.
Moore, you go into 'Image Size,' crank up the dpi and let the processor do its thing.
You don't gain any actual resolution, of course - but it impresses the clueless.
Sorta like 'compressing the image' is somehow going to make it higher resolution. Ain't happening - you always lose resolution doing compression.
Only way to get a higher resolution image is it make it higher resolution in the first place.
Snark,
Listen to this, these guys re-image the original image using a 1000 dpi camera and reprint on commercial paper twice as thick as standard photographic paper, then the process of increasing dpi by as much as 6000% is done manually with dual computers. Photoshop is 20 years behind these guys process, trust me I have see the test results of their process, very impressive......
Exo-UfoolOists are obviously very, very desperate. Nothing is too bizarre or absurd for them to fabricate a shocking-secret story, with that they can fool and deceive their audience. And every exoistic writer supports the other, when he pretends seriousity, but bases his (pseudo)evidence on dodgy claims, lies and books of his buddies. Since people have abandonned scientific education for a couple of years, they believe everything that sounds for them plausible. And they can't distinguish between real science and scientists and pseudoscience. This way Escamilla and Haramein become authoritative sources of information.
The simple and real explanation is, sun is an emitter of fast, charged particles (known as solar wind). Whenever such a particle
has the 'right' speed and hits a CCD-Sensor of a cam, it creates a signal - that can be seen as a blot. JPEG-compression simply creates artificial symmetry. That are the 'UFOs'.
Moore, you still can't get anything more than what's in the original image. Anything 'more' is added - not in the original.
It's like the difference between large format film and the old 110 cartridges - you can only work with what's in the original image.
Snark, An image that under goes dpi compression has been proven in tests to increase resolition bring out details not seen before. It is a if areas that were shadows are now clearly evident, the tests don't lie. The intellectual property contained in the process is proven, there is no way to fake the tests or results.
2/08/2010
There is discussion as to the plausibility weather or not an image let's take for example of 100 dpi can have the resolution increased or not. Take for example a 100 dpi image is enlarged 500%. Just because it is increased in size 500% did it show more detail than when at it's original 100% size? No!A 100 dpi image is going to show the same at it's original size of 100% or 500%.'It will show no more than the level of dpi it is at, being 100 dpi.However,there are cameras that have settings on them to take photos/images at 300 and 600 dpi.If you took a photo of the same object at 300 dpi, and again at 600 dpi,(which camera mfger's already make), which would show that object with greater resolution and detail? The 300 dpi photo or the 600 dpi one? of course the 600 dpi photo would show more detail.So,an image can show more detail when the dpi is increased.I'll address the Photoshop,Photozoom and After-Efects, programs/increasing dpi as Researcher-2
2/08/20109:40-CST-Comments have been made, when using Photoshop,Photo-zoom, or After-Effects that increased the pixel differential does not increase any detail in the image.True or false? This is true. So, this disproves Ron Stewart's invented process.True? No, the answer is false.How? If you simply compare how a camera that is designed that can take photos of the same object-at settings of 300 and 600 dpi(that is manufactured and on the market, though expensive),and compare that with how pixels are increased in Photoshop/other similar software programs there is no comparison. The principles in which the camera operates and shows more detail in a 600 dpi image compared to the 300 dpi image of the same object is readily seen.Not in the Photoshop etc. programs.Search it out on Google you'll see what I mean. Thank you !
Moore, I can pull up detail hidden in shadows, tweak colors and all kinds of things.
The one thing I cannot do - nor can anyone else - is uncover greater detail than is in the original.
I can shoot at 300 or 600 dpi. I can shoot a large photo, say 14 x 9 inches at 200 dpi, shrink it to 7 x 4.5 and double the dpi to 400 - but I don't gain any actual resolution, I just push the dots closer together.
If someone is getting more information than is in the original image, then he's wasting his time messing with photos - he should be turning lead into gold with his alchemy.
even if we can prove that these planet-sized ufo's are using our sun as a stargate...what can we do about it? do we have the technological resources to stop them or prevent them from trespassing our territory? these beings know we can't do anything about it no matter how much we protest.
Read, and more importantly STUDY, your bible and it will all make sense!
lol
God and UFo's, huh? Its just as Robert Anton Wilson said. I guess the reptilians are real. Perhaps the 2012 solstace will be an alien invasion of Israel.
Snark,
You only know what you know and it's obvious you don't know how to increase dpi creating a 3D matrix image. Do you really believe that you know everything about increasing dpi and that no new discovery or technolgy is possible? Please, get a GRIP!! There is so much more to this imaging process you don't know than you do know.........
Moore, pros work with RAW files because any kind of compresion loses data - it's fundamental physics.
If the data is not in the original image, you can't suddenly 'find' it, I don't care what kind of hyperbolic tricks you use.
If it's not in the original image, it's being ADDED - and the result is no different than Photoshopping someone into a photo they were not in originally, regardless of technique: it's a false image.
I am personally not getting the leap from some dots on an image of the sun to "planet sized ufos exiting the sun via portals." That is an enormous leap - where is that coming from?! Blowing up a blotch and making it look even more blotchy is not proof of a statement as outrageous as that. I am open to new information that conflicts with the dull view of reality we've been culturally programmed with through government-sanctioned educational institutions, but it seems to me that all the folks at exopolitics are grasping at fuzzy abstract nothings to prop up their desires and hopes for being rescued from the problems we are being faced with on this planet. I don't see anything concrete coming from these people, ever. The dots aren't connected. There is always channeling or fuzzy pixilated blobs being posted on Youtube as UFOs. If this stuff is happening, we shouldn't have to stretch, we shouldn't have to use hope or faith, we should simply be able to look and clearly see. And we can't.
Snark,
Information can not be lost but can be hidden, it has been proven in labratory tests that definition and resolution can result in hidden or faint objects gain resolution. I think you are going to find the author of this article will invite Optical Scientists and Physicists to find the truth, are we being visited and is our Sun being accessed by Giant UFO's. It the science community would investigate the Earth size UFO's around the Sun we will get definitive answers to this question.
Pages
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!