President Obama stands under George Washington Portrait. Photo: AP
On April 23, at a White House meeting with Congressional leaders, President Obama rejected the idea of a Truth Commission to investigate abuses by the Bush administration. White House press Secretary Robert Gibbs stated that “the president determined the concept didn’t seem altogether workable in this case.” This differed from Obama’s position only a day earlier when he said he was open to investigating possible abuses. He stated that investigating Bush policies “was going to be more a decision for the attorney general within the parameters of various laws, and I don’t want to prejudge that.” He also publicly stated the desirability of an independent commission that would not be subject to partisan politics. Obama’s shifting positions reflected intense political pressures placed upon him by those opposed or supportive of such an inquiry. Those desiring to maintain secrecy concerning various kinds of abuses that occured during the Bush administration appeared to have succeeded. Obama would not support a Truth Commission to investigate policies that sanctioned torture and could open the door to additional abuses. One of these include claims that Richard Cheney used an assassination unit to eliminate “terrorist opponents.” In 1991, while Secretary of Defense, Cheney allegedly blocked an initiative by President George H.W. Bush, Snr. to disclose the truth of UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Has Cheney been involved in highly classified efforts over several decades to maintain secrecy concerning UFOs which has involved the deadly use of force? If so, that may explain why President Obama backed out of supporting an independent truth commission.
Senator Patrick Leahy first proposed the idea of a Truth Commission to investigate abuses sanctioned by the Bush administration on February 9, 2009 at Georgetown University. A petition launched soon after, with currently over 100,000 signatures, recommended investigation of abuses that “include the use of torture, warrantless wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, and executive override of laws.” An important supporter of Leahy’s Truth Commission is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who reaffirmed her support on April 23, by commenting that she has “always been for a truth commision.”
Leahy’s proposed Truth Commission would have the power to investigate Cheney’s alleged assassination unit. This emerged from a conference held in Minneapolis on March 10 where respected journalist Seymour Hersh said that Vice President Cheney ran an assassination unit out of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC). Hershey said that the JSOC unit reported directly to Cheney and operated without any kind of Congressional oversight. Even the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretary of Defense were out of the loop on JSOC operations according to Hersh.. Hersh concluded: “It’s an executive assassination ring essentially, and it’s been going on and on and on.”
A Truth Commission with a broad mandate to investigate “executive override of laws” could look into Cheney’s alleged assassination unit and its possible connection to maintaining UFO secrecy. Many witnesses have come forward to disclose that they have been aware of extreme threats being used to silence whistleblowers and others with information on UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Most importantly, many witnesses and researchers have allegedly been assassinated in order to maintain secrecy. President Bush Jnr, has publicly stated that Cheney has knowledge of the UFO issue gained from his time as Secretary of Defense. In answer to a question about whether he would release UFO information during the 2008 Presidential campaign, Bush referred to Cheney and said:“Sure, I will. This man knows. He was Secretary of Defense and was a great one.” Combined with recent revelations from reliable sources that Cheney blocked a 1991 initiative to disclosure the truth about UFOs, and him more recently heading an assassination unit, it appears that there is a prima facie case that Cheney did use assassination teams to prevent UFO disclosure.
President Obama’s rationale for rejecting a Truth Commission is that it would “open the door to a protracted backward-looking discussion.” It is hard to understand how achieving open and transparent government, Obama’s stated political ideals, can be achieved without exposing past abuses by the Bush administration. It is by exposing past abuses that the various interest groups and actors ultimately responsible for these can be prevented from undue influence over the Obama administration. Rejecting Bush administration policies is not enough, since the same actors responsible for past abuses will be free to continue to exert a behind the scenes influence. This hidden influence is reflected in Obama’s rapidly changing positions on the desirability of a Truth Commission. Was Cheney or his supporters directly involved in changing Obama’s position in order to prevent abuses involving Cheney coming to light? Did one of these alleged abuses involve the authorization of political assassination to prevent UFO disclosure? Such allegations need serious investigation and should not be swept away due to partisan political pressure.
Comments
It should be abundantly clear by now that Obama is just as controlled, just as intimidated, just as cowardly, and just as committed to keeping the status quo as his predecessors.
No amount of conventions, petitions, or other means of having him address the UFO situation is going to work.
Bill Cain says:
It should be abundantly clear by now that Obama is just as controlled, just as intimidated, just as cowardly, and just as committed to keeping the status quo as his predecessors.
No amount of conventions, petitions, or other means of having him address the UFO situation is going to work.
---------------------------------------------
Bill has a point. Unfortunately, the human element has been woefully negligent with the disclosure issue. The power structure (Obama not included) does not know how to handle the disclosure agenda. It is not monolithic contary to popular belief. There are so many competing factions who cannot agree on how to proceed with this volatile issue. And yes, this was broached and debated at the secret UN UFO meetings. In fact, our source got into an acrimonious debate with a China official over who should pay for disclosure. Damn near came to blows too! No disinformation or bullshit about this incident.
This is why we feel that at the end of the day it might just be putting the ships over selected targets on earth to wake us up. This indeed would be dangerous without disclosure first. The meltdown factor could be magnified one hundred fold if the power structure doesn't come clean and let the people of this planet know we are not alone.
Contact first without disclosure is a terrible option.
Addendum: The Chinese official and our source's confrontation was told to Michael Salla with Bob Vanderclock, my brother (Shawn), and I at a meeting in which we set up sometime ago. Michael is one of 10 researchers who have met our source, credentials and all. Shawn and I, luckily, have been privy to a lot more information regarding disclosure and contact. However, we have to sit tight and see how the political appointments proceed. We are hopeful.
Steven Greer says that his sources say the threat to kill whistleblowers largely evaporated after his 2001 press conference at the National Press Club. Afterward, none of CSETI's witnesses were threatened. However, the fact that Greer first wanted direct, hands-on technology witness David Adair to testify, then scotched it suggests that some more direct witnesses may feel unsafe. Solution? More people coming out with more information---break the dam.
Obama appears to think that a truth commission will immediately be derided by Republicans as a fishing expedition. He can still go case by case, and Cheney is now in very hot water. More importantly, the ball must move into an international court in order to be above the inbred corporate regime that slouches around in places like Bohemian Grove and the CFR, groups dominated by both the gutless and the clueless. **Such offenders aren't strongmen; they're just the opposite. They aren't a match for an e.t. colonizer, which is yet another reason to move the issue into broad daylight (but be careful about wrong use of scalars).
The e.t. subject wouldn't likely have been touched by even Leahy's idea of a commission, for two reasons. One, the CIA Act of 1949 that Michael discusses in his latest book is still on the books, allowing CIA to fund a crime empire by spending other gov't agencies' moneys without respect to law re their use; and two, legislators aren't scientists who usually understand the subject of scalar energy (so they tend to fear its weapons potential), they don't know that it can be and is used in fine-scale research without danger. Some don't even know that a system of scalar detectors is already in place.
There's a kind of dog and pony circus of blowhard talk, posturing with crony AF generals, and a cultish aspect to the CFR/crime regime's select way of leading only certain obedient legislators out to view e.t. bodies and that reported downed craft on a base near D.C. It's like peep show barkers trying to boost their own stature.
The most obvious danger in it all is that when it's all compartmentalized so that no one can get a comprehensive overview, crimes and betrayals can be so extreme, that, as Michael suggests in his latest book, certain visiting e.t. elements are an "internal" security problem within the US, more than an external matter--due to basing and secrecy.
On the other hand, disclosure is a kind of liberation, a move into a more mature, more scientific, informed community on a larger scale. That kind of expolitics is as Webre points out, the politics that already exists in the larger universe all around us. That is what we need to better assimilate and it should be a key, essential part of any expopolitics discussion.
As many whistleblowers as possible should be encouraged to come forward. Yes this is an historical matter to deal with....But Earth itself is at stake. We need to have full disclosure to fully educate the people of this world to deal with an extraterrestrial presence. Has it occurred to anyone what is our actual role in this? What level of sovereignty our planet enjoys??
"time for a change"? my ass, folks who pretend that g.w./cheney are the extent of bad government have forgotten carter/brezinski handing iran to the ayatollah/afghanistan to the soviets and clinton/reno "child abuse burns me up"in waco. time to realise both dems and reps are bankrupting and enslaving us.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!