We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Sources say smackdown of Obama by Supreme Court may be inevitable

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. 

Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.  Critics have complained that much if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.

(AP Photo/Keith Srakocic). Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.

Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.

The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.  

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government.  Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.

Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.  And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'

Apparently, the Court has had enough.

The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven.  A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration.

Such a thing would be long overdue.

First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something.  And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.  The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.

In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

Second,  sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.  The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue.  This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.  And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not the President himself, in hot water with the Court.  Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.  Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ to sue the state of Arizona.  That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.

And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.  The group is caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.

A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Be sure to catch my blog at The Liberty Sphere.

Advertisement

By

Conservative Examiner

As an original foot-soldier in 'the Reagan Revolution' that led to the election of Ronald Reagan, Anthony G. Martin is no stranger to politics,...

Comments

  • csjd 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    It will be interesting to learn the point at which Obama will take the path of his predecessor/hero, FDR, and attempt to pack the Supreme Court with his radical progressive friends. He has to avoid the exposure the Supreme Court may provide at all costs.

  • URU 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    He's already trying. Sotomayor and now Kagan...

  • insanityrules 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Obama will be the last President of the United States.......do you know why?

  • Anonymous 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    why?

  • Franco 46 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Yeah, Like I'm going to listen to anything from someone with a handle called "Insanity Rules"

  • walrus 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    csjd says:
    "It will be interesting to learn the point at which Obama will take the path of his predecessor/hero, FDR, and attempt to pack the Supreme Court with his radical progressive friends. He has to avoid the exposure the Supreme Court may provide at all costs."

    uhhhh, guess how many presidents have tried to "pack the court" their way? ALL OF THEM!!!!! it's a foregone conclusion that ANY president will try to get appointees for "their team" and the opposing side will try to pack it their way. WHY DO YOU THINK IT'S PACKED CONSERVATIVE NOW???? Conservative Presidents!!!! DUUUUUUH!!! And EVERY supreme court justice knows what is expected of them: Hold out retirement until a president on YOUR TEAM can name your replacement. That has always been the way...where have you been when all this was going on?

  • Anonymous 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    What he means is to keep adding justices until his own appointees are in the majority. FDR wanted to expand the court to 15 justices instead of the traditional 9.

  • Anonymous 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Not a big student of history are you?

    See if you can find any information on the Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937.

  • Julie T 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that there has to be 9 Justices. I didn't know that until I took a tour of the Capitol. The "one" could put more on if he so chooses.... then we are completely screwed!!!

  • geb 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    I hope the courts will act promptly before Obama does more damage to this great country. I feel, in time, history will look back at this president and see the depth of his deceptions and ties to unsavory persons and countries. America made a mistake when we elected him, but we will peacably go back to the ballot box and "correct" our mistake. November starts this process...

  • JR Bailey Casper Christianity Examiner 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Poor, poor, poor Walrus,

    The poor Soc. Prog. self-server can't seem to pick up a history book and read about the singular differences in the FDR Administrations re SCOTUS:

    FDR, Socialist that he was, actually created NEW seats on the Bench so that he could pack the court NOT as any other president had attempted to do, but by actually adding seats to SCOTUS, thereby obviating the Constitution, the acceptable paradigm of SCOTUS, and thereby keep his policies from being struck down.

    Economists now understand after having reviewed the economic evidence from FDR's Administration, that FDR's Socialist Policies actually EXTENDED and DEEPENED the Great Depression by SEVERAL YEARS.

    It took WWII to pull us out of that malaise.....not a pleasant thought today, as far too many rogue countries have nukes.....Iran to be one of them....UNTIL the Israelis turn Persia into a Field of Glass.

    Cheers.

  • RSBL 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Iran does not have nukes, stay off the fox channel. Iran is a signatory of the NNPT and has inspections from the IAEA. There is no indication they are creating a nuke. When you listen to Israhell, the stupid wears off.

  • RSBL 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Israhell is NOT a signatory of the NNPT and does not have inspections from the IAEA, however they have been found trying to proliferate nukes to south africa...who is the threat in the middle east? Why wont Israhell allow inspections? Iran has not attacked anyone in over 200 years, Israel attacks its neighbors daily. Sets up nazi checkpoints for the indiginous population, creates its own ghetto in gaza, killed an american in international waters trying to bring food and medicine, and they are prime suspects for 9/11. They also attacked the USS Liberty...you want to defend these philth? They are not the semetic jews of the Bible, Israel is a people, not a state. The Ashkenazi, non-semitic people have hijacked the real semetic jews. They use them as shields from criticism. I cant stand blind people who fall for the propaganda du-jour.

  • Drizzle 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Wow -- I didn't know they provided the loony-bin inmates with internet access! Must be interesting living in a universe where you can make up your own reality to suit your warped wishes... I thought only muslims bought into such grossly obvious lies!

  • Anthony G. Martin 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    I think that Americans are in no more of a mood to allow Obama to pack the Court than they were when FDR tried to do it. Such an act will only confirm the perception that he is one step away from being a dictator.

  • Poor Demonrats... 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    walrass is a sad excuse for a libprog even.

  • PHILesq 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    It's too bad that the supreme court can't get an injunction and indictment going against Barry O. for all of his improprieties i.e. birth certificate....sitting on the U.N.'s security council as it's president, Arizona and the immigration issue etc....maybe our impotent senate and corrupt house of reps. will start doing their job after the November elections and address these issues!

  • More racism 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Yawn

  • Bill Cutting 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    A.G.M.
    Don't know if your aware. Looks like Robin Carnahan SOS and D senate candidate has stepped in some s**t in Missouri. She required a (R) Mexican American candidate to produce his citizenship papers or be removed from the ballot, but did not do the same for BHO.
    Was she in the KKK womens auxillary?

  • twisted freaks 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Bill Cutting, speaking of Carnahan, her is how popular her and Obumbler are there. hhehehehhehhhehhhe

    "Pres. Obama is the best fundraiser the Dem Party has, but his drawing power is way down from its peak during the '08 campaign.

    Obama is heading to MO and NV today to raise money for Sec/State Robin Carnahan (D), running for an open Senate seat, and Senate Maj. Leader Harry Reid.

    But Carnahan's campaign wasn't able to completely sell out the Folly Theater, where Obama will appear for a grassroots event on Carnahan's behalf, at the prices they wanted. Tickets once priced at $250 are now going for $99, while $35 tickets are half off."

  • twisted freaks 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    1078 seats and the Obumbler can't fill them!

    If they invite Sarah Palin they would need a bigger hall!

    hehehehehehe

  • PHILesq 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Barry O.'s rhetorical polly-rasamataz jibberish fails the county, fails the democratic party and is failing him....2012 will be the time to send him packing back to Chi town to sell used cars on the south side !

  • walrus 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    twisted freaks says:
    "1078 seats and the Obumbler can't fill them!
    If they invite Sarah Palin they would need a bigger hall!
    hehehehehehe"

    I know, huh?
    Sarah needs to teach Obama how to sing, "My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard,
    And they're like
    It's better than yours,
    Damn right it's better than yours,
    I can teach you,
    But I have to charge...."

  • Bill Cutting 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    (Tickets once priced at $250 are now going for $99, while $35 tickets are half off.")
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Pretty sad, Obummer should fire who ever set that one up for him.

    The more I read and listen to Maldonado the more I like him. Decorated Iraqi war vet, real conservative, American of Mexican decent.
    An Obot's worst nightmare!!

  • Luis Gonzalez 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Quick note about comparing mandatory automobile insurance and mandatory health care.

    Automobile insurance (that being a policy purchased from an insurance company) is not THE requirement in most States. Most (if not all) States give drivers the choice of purchasing such a policy, posting a surety bond or even acquiring a DMV-issued certificate of self-insurance.

    Of course, one always has the choice to NOT own and operate a motor vehicle.

    Obama's health care allows for no such choices.

  • Ron 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Yes RSBL.. they don't have nukes.. and neither does North Korea... Keep thinking that... Do you have to be hit in the head by a hammer to believe that hammer hurts... just like with Iraq... Iran only lets them search where they want them to search... moves research around, and simply refuses to allow inspections.. so keep believing... CSJD... he can't pack.... Kennedy said he isn't retiring just to keep him from replacing his posting with a libtard... and if they go after him, he will be gone, without a chance... then the next should go is his lynch-man VP Biden... such a ignorant Ba---rd

  • PJS 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    WOW. I am always amazed how stupid people are. You don't get it and never will. You always make the same mistakes.

    This is easy. We must take all Benefits away from Congress. Plus we must elect either poor or middles class people into office. Only they will make positive changes.
    Everyone in office now is very wealthy. I promise you. No one will ever make any changes that will hurt themselves.

    Like I said. You always do the same thing. It does not matter at all what party is in the White house.

    Good Luck. You will need it.

  • PJS 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    WOW. I am always amazed how stupid people are. You don't get it and never will. You always make the same mistakes.

    This is easy. We must take all Benefits away from Congress. Plus we must elect either poor or middles class people into office. Only they will make positive changes.
    Everyone in office now is very wealthy. I promise you. No one will ever make any changes that will hurt themselves.

    Like I said. You always do the same thing. It does not matter at all what party is in the White house.

    Good Luck. You will need it.

  • Beth T. 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Mr. Martin, I so hope you are right that the Supreme Court will come to the aid of the American people, and the sooner the better! It seems Obama has managed to neutralize the Congress and Senate. God help us if something doesn't happen to reign him in and soon! I'm not sure we can wait until November (or January in reality) at the rate Obama is destroying the country. Some people call it a bloodless coup. I am inclined to agree. Thank you for your hopeful article. In God we trust, Obama we don't.

  • Anthony G. Martin 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Beth--I can only hope as well. However, let me be quick to say that nobody really knows what the Court will do on any given issue. Even the Roberts Court has disappointed me in some of its decisions, particularly those that were good overall but contained wording with enough loopholes for enemies of the Constitution to jump through. I suppose we'll just have to wait and see--and pray.

  • Phoebe 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    One can hope and pray! In the meantime, LT Commander Fitzpatrick in Tennessee has given "we the people" a possible way to take our country back, it has to start at the local level. He has seen much treason! Govt. can't get away Treason, Treason, Treason. Mr. Martin I wish I could find out how to contact you for this story. Thank you!

  • Jimmy L. Shirley Jr. 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    It is too damn bad this particular "cough,cough" President will be able to retire on our dime and have SS protection for the rest of his life. Him and his family.

  • StealthConveyance 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    We also need to put the true and ratified 13th Amendment back in place where it belongs. amendment - 13 . org (remove the spaces)

    The United States Civil Flag of Peacetime barefootsworld . net / uscivilflag . html (remove the spaces)

  • Jim 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Such drivel. Is this some pathetic fantasy you were experiencing and simply had to write it down?
    Sad that you hold the Supreme Court in such low regard that you would accuse them of having some sort of neo-con melt-down and "punish" Obama for disagreeing with him by making bad calls in future cases as some form of twisted retaliation.
    No doubt there are a 3 or 4 imbeciles that were seated on the court by the idiots in your camp who are certainly capable of such a childish tantrum. But by the grace of God our nation wised up just in time to take your people out of power and will bring balance back to the court.
    Who's dropping off next? Thomas, Scalia.....? Better hurry right wingers!

  • Duke 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    I hope he came be fired,kicked out, Impeached, and thrown in jail, but then the blacks would say it was done because he was black.

  • PC 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Jim, where do you live, under a rock??? Crawl out and open your eyes.

  • Gorefan 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Manditory health insurance is not a new concept in America. In 1789, Congress passed, and President John Adams signed "An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen". The law mandated privately employed merchant sailors to purchase healthcare insurance, employeers were required to withhold the premium from the sailor's paycheck (first payroll tax), and if they failed to collect the premium there was a penalty.

    historycooperative.org/journals/cp/vol-09/no-01/rao/

    Over 195 years later, 19 Republican senators proposed the "Health Equity and Access Reform Today Act of 1993." This measure also had manditory health insurance and in many respects was similar to the current health care law.

    kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2010/February/23/GOP-1993-health-reform-bill.aspx

  • Fred 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Why don't you put your money where your mouth is? Orly's case will be laughed out of court before Labor Day. I'll bet you a thousand dollars. Are you up for it?

  • Politijab.com_Foggy 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    "sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President."

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

    Yeah, sure, the Supreme Court is going to go back and take all the moron Birther cases it already rejected!!!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    Who are your "sources," the voices in your shrimpy headbone?

  • A pen 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    The foggy poster is an obot troll. I suspect he is on the payroll, your taxes hard at work. The old saying about law, you can run but you can't hide, is true. It has always been sheer guile that has kept the communists from their date at the bench. When it arrives we must make certain no crack or crevice in this nation is left for one to hide.

  • Politijab.com_Foggy 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Yes, by all means, call me a communist, accuse me of being on the payroll, and above all, pretend to talk tough like you have some power in this great land of ours.

    That way, you won't have to admit that the Birthers are the WORLD'S BIGGEST EPIC FAIL. At Politijab, we've kept track of every single Birther lawsuit. The score so far is:

    U.S. Constitution = 70
    Moron Birthers = ZERO

    There isn't even one Birther lawsuit that hasn't been dismissed already. A few are still on appeal, heading for the trash heap. You'd think after two years of these lunatics achieving nothing, they'd get a tiny little grip on reality, but no.

    They tried fake grand juries. Epic Fail.

    They tried a fake trial in Harlem. Epic Fail.

    They beg the military to stage a coup and overthrow the government. Epic Fail.

    They talk a lot about We The People "rising up". Epic Fail.

    It's hugely entertaining to see a loser like Anthony Martin (who was even kicked out of Free Republic) talk about his "sour

  • Randall 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Fact he is a president. Ilegually. and should be stripped of everything,and detained until our national defense is back to par. then all he and the dems signed in and passed should be vetoed the banks and car dealers should pay back the stim money, their bailouts was nothing more than bonuses and obasma holds big stock with dodge and they got stim, and most importantly send 150,000, more troops to iraq finish what we started and tell iran to co-operate with un or we will kick their ass to then bring our service people home. not just obama all that supported him democrats need to be put out and the heck with the winers if they dont like it then time for that civil war, if their to blind to see whats happening and hell their asking for it by saying kill the whites and their babbies and obama was born in kenya, read the globe over 4th july i already contacted 5 republicans asked what are they going to do ? no replies and all states should join arizona greast job white knights drive on

  • Politijab.com_Foggy 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    So, umm ... Randall?

    Did you get held back and have to do third grade again?

  • Randall 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    no foggy went to paratrooper school and became a sniper in process, so how did you serve?

  • Anthony G. Martin 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Funny how the 'Foggy'-woggy numbskull zeros in exclusively on the so-called 'birther' issue, totally ignoring the broad picture of fraud, corruption, cronyism, violations of the Constitution, failing to obey direct court orders, and on and on. It seems the only one deserving of ridicule and the laughter of derision is Froggy-woggy himself, whoever he/she may be--sounds like a Free Republic TROLL to me.

  • Atticus Finch 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Since when is the United States Supreme Court in the business of
    accepting information on a sitting President? I find nothing in the United States Constitution that would give the Supreme Court the power to accept informaton in a sitting President. Moreover, wouldn't there be a conflict of interest if the sitting President filed a lawsuit in a federal court? Wouldn't the entire Supreme Court would have to recluse itself?

    I though the constitutional duty of the United States Supreme Court was to hear cases from lower federal courts? Wouldn't the act of accepting information on a sitting president be in violation of this constitutional duty?

  • Anthony G. Martin 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Finch--If the court quietly agreed to take a case from a lower court on appeal, then they could with Constitutional authority receive and consider information on a sitting President. NO ONE is above the law.

  • A Sane Texan 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Most ridiculous article I have read in a long time!

  • A Sane Texan 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    You say: .... sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. ....

    Well if that is true then we can look forward to some of the Justices to be kicked out of The SCOTUS for ethics violations.
    Apparently you don't know how the Supreme Court works. They hear only CASES that have already gone through the Appellate Courts, that are submitted to them for review by attorneys that are eligible/qualified to present cases to the Supreme Court.
    Anyone that thinks the Supreme Court is collecting dirt on Obama from under the table is just plain nuts!
    Amazing how many people fall for all the BS that the birthers are spewing! LOL :)

  • Politijab.com_Foggy 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    So, umm ... Randall?

    Did you get held back and have to do third grade again?

Pages

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...