While the Stu Sutcliffe family is insisting the former member of the Beatles is singing the song "Love Me Tender," there also is a lot of speculation that it's not him. The analysis of the song has brought out plenty of opinions on both sides.
- Read part 1 of this story with the opinion of Tony Sheridan
- Klaus Voormann and Bill Harry's opinions
"It is intriguing. It is a studio recording rather than a live recording and so Stuart, if it is him, had gone to the studio with the purpose of the recording the song. We know that Astrid was very fond of Stuart singing Love Me Tender so it could have been as a present for her. But this is speculation upon speculation. Hopefully a recording engineer will be able to date the recording."Oddly enough, I have never come across John, Paul or George talking about Stu's singing voice. On this evidence, it sounds good, rather like Billy Fury on his early singles, Maybe Tomorrow and Margo, but at the moment I'm skeptical.
"As far as we know and that includes Pete, it was never recorded."
"This is me singing "Ask Me Why" and then "Love Me Tender" for the movie "Birth of the Beatles" starting at 4:24...I had never heard Stu Sutcliffe sing so the producers asked me to try and project what I thought he would sound like...turns out I was pretty close to the original.. Thanks for listening, Ed Lineberry, Original Rain."
In time, those responsible for overseeing Stuart’s Estate were curious to know whether the tape could be cleaned up. Help came in the form of Dan Whitelock-Wainwright, Pauline’s techno-expert great-nephew, currently at University and a member of the rock band Groan. Dan’s cousin Alex Whitelock-Wainwright (at University in Liverpool) also possessed a copy of the original tape and he wrote in his blog: “The original I have has a constant hiss throughout; that’s all that has been modified with the released version and the sound levels are higher. Talking to my cousin, who first tried to clean the track up, (he) believes that the noise frequencies have been totally cleaned out which has removed some instruments and they have been overdubbed back onto the track.”
It was the 24/7 division of IODA that finished the mastering, leaving Stuart’s voice unmanipulated, only louder.
There was never any doubt that the voice was Stuart’s. But the Estate has another reason to know the tape is genuine: they know Stuart.
1. What kind of provenance is the source if it is in question what was the original source (tape, acetate etc) - even unknown to the seller???2. Klaus Voormann, Astrid Kirchherr, Bill Harry and Pete Best have big question marks about the voice!3. The backing sounds very modern!4. The arrangement sounds like a cover from a 1966 Percy Sledge cover!5. The arrangement is totally different to Elvis` version and you should expect the cover done by Stu in 1961 near the Elvis` version - as shown in Backbeat film!!6. The voice of the Birth of the Beatles version does sound very simiar to this even it is not the same take.7. The "raw version" does sound worthend afterwards and not like historical hiss or surface noice!8. The soundtrack Stu might be working on for his films as written in the letter: do you expect he would SING a long (even like this) on that? I don`t!9. Why has his recording never been mentioned by anybody way back in 1961/62 - by Astrid, Klaus, Pete, Tony....??10. If the recording is known since the 80ies - why was it never a question for Anthology - or the various Sutcliffe DVDs?? This would bring much more money for the previous owner!11. His stint with the Bats was for one week only in February 1962 - it is not known that he made any more musical things after he left the Beatles and he sold his bass to Klaus Voormann.12. Who were the musicians? No one claimed to be involved? Where was it recorded? There is no studio in Hamburg where you could run into for a joke...!
To sum it up. This recording is NOT authentic. If I would own such recording - I would ask Apple for a nice sum when they were working on Anthology and not giving it to the family. The previous owner knew why he has not approached Apple - there would have been a lot of people (George, Paul, Ringo, Neil etc) who knew Stus voice.
- EXCLUSIVE: Tony Sheridan, others on song linked to ex-Beatle Sutcliffe (part 1)
- New details add to debate on unearthed song by former Beatle Stu Sutcliffe
- EXCLUSIVE: Two who knew ex-Beatle Stu Sutcliffe weigh in on song controversy
- EXCLUSIVE: Ex-Beatle Stu Sutcliffe's sister tells why voice on song is him
- Estate of late Beatle Stu Sutcliffe opens his first fan club, offers song by him
RELATED READING:












Comments