Skip to main content
Report this ad

See also:

Obama brings up birther subject at WH Correspondents' dinner; refers to Kenya

WH Correspondents' dinner
WH Correspondents' dinner
WH Correspondents' Association

Barack Obama's speech at the 2014 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner was viewed by many as a time to 'even things up' with those who have opposed him.

Obama was described by in Obama Skips Self-Deprecation, Lashes Out at Republicans in Vicious WHCA Dinner Monologue as vicious. Explaining their view, stated, "Still, that seems to be the problem: A man who can't laugh at himself is a man who is devoid of humor, and nearly always, bitter and petty."

Interestingly, at the recent Correspondents' dinner, Obama brought up 'birthers' not once, but twice. The two quotes from the Washington Post's transcript are:

"While we are talking sports, just last month, a wonderful story. An American won the Boston Marathon for the first time in 30 years. [Applause] Which was inspiring and only fair since a Kenyan has been president for the last six. We have to even things out."

"I’m just kidding. Let’s face it, Fox, you will miss me when I’ m gone. [Laughter] It will be harder to convince the American people that Hillary was born in Kenya. [Laughter] [applause]"

Although both of Obama's birther comments referred to "Kenya," the main goals in current court challenges involving Obama's concealed records do not stress a Kenyan birth. Rather, allegations of using a Social Security number which was not issued to him, a fabricated Selective Service registration form and a fabricated on-line Certificate of Live Birth are detailed in the court cases.

Why did Obama cautiously avoid the accusations which are alleged in actual lawsuits currently in courts throughout America? Why not discuss the allegations and provide evidence to dispute the allegations?

One current case, Taitz vs. Colvin, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Case #1:13-cv-01878-ELH, U.S. District Court in Baltimore, Maryland, filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney, seeks a court order to obtain the SS-5 application for the Social Security number which is currently being used by Barrack Obama. Taitz alleges that the Connecticut number was issued to Harrison J. Bounel in Connecticut.

Taitz vs. Colvin, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is a Freedom of Information Act request -- the same court request which was used by Judicial Watch to recently obtain old Benghazi e-mails. Millions of Americans are awaiting a judge's decision in order to view the SS-5 application for the Connecticut Social Security number which is currently used by Barrack Obama.

Considering 2014 current court challenges, a more relevant 'joke' for Obama's speech could have been the following:

"I’m just kidding. Let’s face it, Fox, you will miss me when I’ m gone. [Laughter] It will be harder to convince the American people that Hillary has been using a Social Security number which was issued in Connecticut to a another person. [Laughter] [applause]"

Another current court challenge awaiting a decision is Taitz vs. Donahue, Postmaster General, Case #1:13-cv-01020-RCL, Washington D.C., U.S. District Court, filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney.

Explaining the Donahue case, which also contains a FOIA request, Taitz states, "This case is against the Postmaster General and Inspector General for the USPS. It demonstrates that a year ago Attorney Orly Taitz provided them with information, a sworn affidavit of the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations unit of the U.S. coast Guard, showing that Obama’s Selective Service certificate is a forgery, and it contains a fabricated postal stamp. For a year, they covered it up and did not take any action. I filed a FOIA request. They did not respond within 20 days as required; a legal action was filed. After the case was filed, a letter arrived showing that the Inspector General sent the complaint by Taitz to the fraud division and demanded action and report within 30 days. There was no report and Inspector General did not take any action for a year . . . . . "

As early as 2007, a document was available on-line -- Barack Obama's Indonesian school registration form -- which described his last name as 'Soetoro' and his citizenship as 'Indonesia.'

For more than five years, millions of Americans have searched for the truth and for answers to the 'mystery' of Barack Obama's concealed records -- calling, writing, signing petitions, sending e-mails and faxes to Congress requesting investigations and action, in addition to filing lawsuits.

More and more Americans are expressing concerns about the truthfulness of our government.

Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Darrell Issa recently expressed his concern regarding the truthfulness of the Obama administration. In the video, Darrell Issa: You cannot believe this White House, Issa refers to new Benghazi e-mails obtained by court order, and he states, "Americans have learned you cannot believe this White House, and you cannot believe this president."

Issa adds, "And the facts are coming out that in fact this administration has knowingly withheld documents pursuant to Congressional subpoenas in violation of any reasonable transparency . . . . "

Bill O'Reilly recently described our media as 'dishonest.' O'Reilly's video, "Proof that the American media is dishonest," states, "There is no question that the White House misrepresented the terror attack on September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya. . . . This is huge! . . . Only USA Today put the story on the front page . . . They are covering up a cover-up. . . . . There is one reason -- to protect President Obama . . . . . . "

It took 19 months -- 1 1/2 years -- to view the Benghazi e-mails, which were obtained by Judicial Watch from a FOIA court procedure, 'not' from government officials, 'not' from Congress and 'not' from the media.

At this point, the question is: Why would anyone think the 'unanswered birther subject' is humorous and entertaining?

Is the White House hiding anything else?

Report this ad