Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Independent

Married? The Judicial Assault on your Unalienable, Natural Law Rights

See also

Though this article focuses on the departures from the Rule of Law in the Divorce case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki vs. David Rucki, this writer takes a broader perspective. That broader being one addressing the importance of enforcing adherence to the the Rule of Law and Due Process; both of which are not only statutory requirements but Constitutional and Natural Law Rights of every person. (Before we go farther, this writer asserts that he would write the same article if the roles of the parties were reversed.) This article is a follow up to the latest hearing relating to this matter from January 10, 2014 and a call to action for the upcoming January 27, 2014 hearing for Lawyer Michelle MacDonald.

  • Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Martin Luther King Jr.,

[The next round in this battle against injustice occurs, Monday, January 27, 2014 at 9 AM Dakota County District Court, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN. State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Court file no. 19HA-CR-13-2934]

Let us begin with an intellectual and emotional appetizer intended to make you non-lawyer types hungry for the rest of the story.

Imagine finding yourself in this scenario, you and your spouse have been married nearly 20 years. You have built a successful business and have five children. To settle the Divorce, you agree to take the family home of 14 years and have custody of your 5 children while letting your spouse have parenting time, the business, and other properties.

Somewhere along the line your spouse sits you and the 5 children down at the table with a gun and says either “you are going to kill everyone” or “you are only going to kill yourself”.

More than a year after the divorce is settled, you find out about a hearing that you were not party to. With no evidentiary hearing or finding of fact, Sheriffs inform you must be out of the house and cannot tell the children why. You drop the children off at school and go home and pack only the one bag that the Sheriff’s deputy will let you pack. Everything else is lost to you. The children are to be taken care of by an undisclosed third party. And you leave your home of 14 years.

A year later, during a hearing to restore the divorce agreement and regain custody of the children, your lawyer is arrested during the hearing for reasons yet unknown and you are told to leave, as obviously the hearing will not continue. You take the files and other property left in the court room so they do not become “lost”. You later learn that after you left, the Judge resumed the hearing with your lawyer in handcuffs, without glasses, shoes, files or a client….

Later you find that the children are back with your spouse, but two of them have run away and not been seen in months.

That should be enough to get your attention and peak your interest.

  • None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.

Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

With that literary appetizer consumed, this writer hopes that the reader will find this writer’s perspective unique and thought provoking enough to be moved to action.

This writer sat in the Federal Court room in St. Paul, MN on January 10, 2014 and heard Judge Susan Richard Nelson ask Lawyer Michelle McDonald to produce Case Law Citations from the Federal 8th Circuit Court. As this writer listened, the following thought began to take root in this writers mind:

  • Can anyone wearing black robes arbitrarily deprive any US citizen of their Unalienable Natural Law Rights?

And with that thought, this writer set about answering this question using this thought process from one of his favorite recurring tweets:

  • You know those neat tricks & observations they use to catch the bad guys in major media and Hollywood shows? You need to start using them on your government.

@DMashak on Twitter (abbreviations & truncations removed)

And so we begin to use those neat tricks and observations to try to make sense of what has transpired and how Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson should rule. In the case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, the facts of interest to this writer are these:

  • The Divorce of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki from David Rucki was complete May, 2011, more than a year before the September 2012 telephone “hearing”;
  • In the Divorce, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki received the home that the family had lived in for 14 years and custody of the 5 children. David Rucki received parenting time, the family business and several other properties;
  • At some point before September 2012, David Rucki sat Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and their 5 children down at a table and produced a gun. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki alleges that David Rucki threatened to kill them all. David Rucki’s position is that he only threatened to kill himself;
  • In September 2012, on the basis of a phone call that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was not party to, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was required by Dakota County MN State Judge David L. Knutson to remove herself from the family home and not tell the children what was happening. It appears that Judge David L. Knutson is citing largely discredited ‘Parental Alienation” [Major Media video: http://goo.gl/SeR1S8] as the basis for his ruling;
  • Further, Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was ordered not to have any direct or indirect contact with the 5 children. Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki reluctantly complied with the Court order. She drove the children to their schools and went home where she was only allowed to pack one bag. This all happened within 24 to 48 hours of the Judge David L. Knutson’s phone conversation which Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was not a party to;
  • An unknown third party was dispatched to the house to take care, custody and control of the children;
  • Judge David L. Knutson has since had all litigation in the county involving either of the two parties directed to him [A practice pioneered by corrupt Minnesota Judge Mary Yunker];
  • It is alleged that within the Court files are 3 letters from the local police indicating that various charges against David Rucki, including Domestic Abuse and violating restraining orders, should not be entered on the official record. Attempts to investigate how these letters came to be have, to date, been thwarted;
  • It is alleged that David Rucki has said on the record that he wanted Sandra Grazzini-Rucki to be left homeless and penniless. According to Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, Judge David L. Knutson has entered various orders (among the hundreds he has entered regarding her), which have left Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki homeless and penniless;
  • Somehow the 5 minor children have since between returned to the custody of David Rucki;
  • Two of the minor children have run away and no one seems to be able to find them;
  • Those of you who have read my article from last week; “Judicial Corruption vs. 1 Minnesota Attorney with ethics, selflessness & a spine” http://t.co/uWg7ysSER5 know what happened next:

While Judge Knutson claims in Federal court, he had nothing to do with it, during a break in the court custody trial on September 12, 2013, sheriff deputies “arrested” me and then brought me back to Judge Knutson’s courtroom in handcuffs and a wheelchair, with no eye glasses, hair piece, shoes, and I was made to continue my participation in the custody trial in this debilitated, humiliating state, without my files, my client, a pen, paper, and with the Rucki children still missing since April, 2013;

  • And per the previous article, Friday, January 10, 2014, there was a hearing before Judge Susan Richard Nelson at the St. Paul, MN Federal Courthouse regarding litigation suing Judge David L. Knutson personally for violating the Civil Rights of Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.

As we continue to parse the transgressions Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and her lawyer Ms. Michelle McDonald have endured, it angers this writer that he must include the following brief remedial primer. What follows should be common knowledge learned in public schools.

  • Our Country is founded upon Natural Law. (To avoid division, this writer prefers to allow individuals to determine for themselves whether Natural Law and Natural Rights are gifts from God or an innate and inherent quality of being a human) Each of us have certain Unalienable Natural Law Rights which cannot be taken away(except as punishment for a crime after having been accorded due process) Most are familiar with the unalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness as written in the Declaration of Independence. (Proof our Country & the US Constitution are founded upon Natural Law http://t.co/rZswNupbeO )

·We also have the Unalienable Right to Due Process pursuant to the Rule of Law. Due Process to include confronting witness against you, submitting your own evidence and calling your own witness within the framework of Sworn Oaths. Further, that that Due Process is to be had pursuant to the Rule of Law. The Rule of Law meaning one set of Laws and interpretation of those laws applies to all of us; without regard to such things as status, position or wealth. (For more info on Natural Law, Please read Natural Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July, 1776 http://t.co/veTyZwl4Q3 and http://t.co/1J5QluFPe6, and John Locke’s 2 Treatises of Civil Government http://t.co/ZJ1tpgJ60j, or https://t.co/qDCsduYZ3w free audio)

"These are the bounds ... to the legislative power of every commonwealth. First, they are to govern by promulgated established laws, not to be varied in particular cases, but to have one rule for rich and poor, for the favourite at court, and the countryman at plough. Secondly, these laws also ought to be designed for no other end ultimately than the good of the people".

John Locke, Second Treatise on Civil Government, Chapter 11, Consent of the Governed

  • All Unalienable Rights cannot be revoked by any earthly being, even a Judge, Politician or Government Bureaucrat (except as previously described as punishment for a crime)

Perhaps these following two quotes by Jefferson and Hamilton best impart the understanding of Natural Rights the Founder’s subscribed to:

  • A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature[Natural Law], and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.

Thomas Jefferson

  • The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.

Alexander Hamilton

Clearly, it was the intent of the Founders that no earthly beings, including Judges in their black robes, could set aside your unalienable rights, except as punishment for a crime pursuant to Due Process according to the Rule of Law.

This brings us back to this writer’s original question:

  • Can anyone wearing black robes arbitrarily deprive any citizen of their unalienable Natural Law Rights?

Clearly the Founders would have said, “No.”

The problem comes in the enforcement of the Constitution and our unalienable Natural Law Rights.

  • The strength of the Constitution lies in the will of the people to defend it.

Thomas Edison

Perhaps the reader should ponder why this writer has had to inform you about Natural Law, Natural Rights, what those are and that the country was founded upon those principles. Doesn’t this fact alone demonstrate that, by design or accident, the vast majority of Americans do not understand they have the Natural Right and duty to force their government to adhere to the Constitution and recognize their Unalienable Natural Law Rights?

  • “And that all men may be restrained from invading others' rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of nature[Natural Law] be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of nature is in that state, put into every man's hands, whereby everyone has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree, as may hinder its violation".

John Locke (Second Treatise, Chapter 2).

  • “Revolt is the right of the people”

John Locke

·Supreme Court Validates People's Rights to Establish Common Law Grand Jury (2013) http://goo.gl/H4Aeu8

What neat tricks and observations can we use to determine if Natural Law slipped into obscurity by oversight or design? Perhaps analyzing the behavior of some of the actors in this legal play will let us determine truth for ourselves using our own observations and reasoning.

To begin with, Natural Law prescribes that the individual should establish truth for themselves using their own observations and reasoning. With that in mind, this writer would ask the reader to just do a common sense assessment of what has allegedly transpired and establish their own common sense opinion of whether justice was done in the case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.

  • Does any of what has transpired sound like it was done with the best interests, and for the general welfare, of the children?
  • Does it sound like Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Unalienable Natural Rights to enjoy familial relations with her own children have been violated?
  • Was Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Unalienable Natural Right to Pursuit of Happiness wrongfully taken from her?
  • Was Sandra Grazzini-Rucki deprived of her Unalienable Natural Right to Due Process pursuant to the Rule of Law?
  • Was Sandra Grazzini-Rucki charged with a crime or alleged to have endangered her children?
  • How can a Divorce that was already finalized be reversed by an entirely different Judge?
  • Why has the Major Media suddenly decided to stop reporting on this issue?;
  • What emotions would you be experiencing if you were put in the position of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki or one of the children involved?
  • At what point would you be so emotionally or financially drained that you could no longer continue to pursue correction of any perceived injustice?
  • Does any of what has transpired thus far sound like the justice the Public Schools, Major Media, Hollywood, your politicians and/or judges have led you to believe you could expect for yourself?

You, as a sovereign citizen of the United States of America have given your “Consent to be Governed”. You as a sovereign citizen have the Right to withdraw your consent to be governed upon exhausting all of your peaceful remedies upon suffering a long train of abuses. (See Declaration of Independence) As a sovereign citizen, you have a duty to use your own observations and reasoning to determine whether your Government is abiding by the Constitution and Natural Law.

  • “It is not function of our government to keep citizens from falling into error; it is the function of citizens to keep government from falling into error.”

Supreme Court of the United States of America

Next, let’s take a look at Judges. Judges are supposed to be learned in the law. Shouldn’t other Judges know whether the actions of Judge David L. Knutson violated Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Natural Rights? Shouldn’t other Judges and Lawyers have came forward and intervened, if for no other reason than to protect and reaffirm, at the very least, the Judiciary’s appearance of Justice and Integrity? Or, maybe you feel that other Judges not criticizing the actions of Judge David L. Knutson validate his actions? Let’s explore that line of thought some more.

  • “In transgressing the law of nature[Natural Law], the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity"

John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, Ch.2, 8

Fox News was covering this matter and suddenly stopped. [ http://goo.gl/SeR1S8] Why? Where is the rest of the Major Media? MIA! Why? Now, we all know that Major Media Lives for ratings so they can charge more for advertising. Clearly what has transpired would be of interest a large number of viewers. So why would Major Media stop covering an emotionally charged news story that would have attracted big ratings?

This writer asserts that, “Somebody made the call”. This writer asserts that the Black Robed Mafia, or someone operating on behalf of the Black Robed Mafia, made the call to upper management and the coverage was cancelled. Deductive reasoning leads us to this conclusion. The owner’s of Major Media are in the business of making money: Increased ratings means greater viewership and profit. Only an external force and/or influence would cause the owners of major media to deviate from their profit motives.

To the point, this writer asserts that Major Media colluded with, and/or was extorted by, your government in a Quid Pro Quo arrangement; An arrangement designed prevent you from making observations that would allow you to use your own reasoning to determine truth for yourself. And, in so depriving you of certain observations, your government has sought to preclude you from mobilizing to correct the injustice.

Does this writer have any other evidence upon which to base that claim of your government censoring the information you receive? Yes! This writer has been involved in the Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) Movement, in one form or another, for 20+ years. Since 2005, hundreds of Minnesotans have been refused a hearing to give evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. These long term, unwarranted denials to exercise our Natural Right to “Petition the government for redress of grievances” as reduced to writing in the First Amendment, came at the hands of the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees.

Contrary to what you may believe, your government acts on the same principle as our current corrupt Judiciary system does. That principle is that if evidence and testimony are not on the official record, it is treated as though it does not exist(even if their own actions prevented it from being entered on the official record). In other words, it doesn’t count. By denying dedicated hearings, not announcing hearings, playing hide and seek with hearings, and/or forcing 20+ people to testify in the last 5 minutes of a hearing, your government keeps evidence and testimony contrary of the vote they want to make, to a minimum. If testimony is not heard on the record, it is not rebroadcast. Ergo, the censorship of the information from the public is complete.

And so the “modus operandi” of your government has been established. Your Government and Judiciary deprive rank and file Americans (and Juries) of information and observations via plausibly deniable censorship. The result being that if rank & file Americans are only fed a steady intellectual diet of information calculated to get the public to vote and/or behave in a manner the government desires, the majority of the public will vote and/or behave in the manner government desired. [It should also be noted that your government, like the courts, count on wearing you out emotionally, as well as financially, as a means to keep evidence and testimony off the official record.)

Now, what other neat tricks and observations can we use to determine whether the current state of affairs in America is by happenstance or design?

We start with the fact that our entire government was predicated on the Founder’s view of the Nature of Man:

  • All [people] have free will and are not virtuous by nature.

Cato Letters 59 & 60

Therefore, our Founder’s built Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability were included in anticipation of generations of non-virtuous persons inhabiting our government. Further, the Constitution was intended as an anchor to prevent successive generations of non-virtuous people from expanding their tyranny over WE THE PEOPLE.

  • “The Constitution isn’t an instrument for government to restrain the people, it is for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests”

Patrick Henry

The intent to erase and mitigate the Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability built into the Constitution is evidenced by the explicit actions of Progressive President Woodrow Wilson. In 1913, President Woodrow Wilson began having America’s Law Schools stop teaching Constitution based Law and start teaching Case Law. Progressive President Woodrow Wilson did not like be constrained by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and Natural Law. By switching to Case Law, successive new Case Law could cite old Case Law as the validation to depart from the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Unalienable Natural Rights and Natural Law. Over time, Case Law would make the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Unalienable Natural Rights and Natural Law meaningless.

So while might not have been apparent to the rest of you what Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson was saying at the January10, 2014 hearing, it was apparent to this writer. In demanding that Lawyer Michelle MacDonald produce relevant 8th Circuit Federal Court Case Law Citations, Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson was saying “ I am going to squash your Constitution, Bill of Rights and Unalienable Natural Law Rights with Case Law and/or the lack thereof. A house of cards all built on the arbitrary, unconstitutional and Natural Law violating actions of Progressive President Woodrow Wilson to replace Constitutional Law with Case Law. This writer trusts the reader affirms this was done intentionally by our Government.

  • “Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in their life, health, liberty or possessions.”

John Locke, Second Treatise of Government

As further evidence of our government’s intent not to act in accordance with the Constitution, Bill of Rights, the Rule of Law or Natural Law we have the FBI’s COINTELPRO Operation against Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Briefly, your government has an ongoing policy of making the leaders of political dissent less effective by demonizing, discrediting and marginalizing them, Lies or Truth being no barrier. (You can read more about your Government’s FBI COINTELPRO Operation against Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. here http://goo.gl/zrJZnL )

Continuing with the evidence of intent, we come next to the Minnesota Legislature unconstitutionally dismantling the Checks and Balances, Transparency and Accountability on the Minnesota State Judiciary as provided for in the Minnesota Constitution.

Our Legislature is constitutionally required to oversee and discipline Minnesota State judges. But the Minnesota Legislature unconstitutionally transferred its constitutional duty to oversee and discipline Judges, to the Minnesota Judiciary itself. In essence, this even goes beyond the proverbial fox guarding the henhouse. And the accompanying bogus Board of Judicial Standards functions more as public relations and judicial scandal cover up operation than as a protection for rank and file Americans from Rogue Judges. The rest of you see Board of Judicial Standards and presume it as evidence of justice and order. Those who have filed complaints against Judges know it as anything but fair and impartial interpreter of the facts.

Pulling together the withdrawal of the major media’s coverage of this case, plus the failure of other judges to step forward to facilitate justice, Progressive President Woodrow Wilsons replacing Constitutional Law with Case Law, The FBI’s COINTELPRO Operation, the Minnesota Legislatures refusal to grant a dedicated hearing to hear evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary since 2005, and the unconstitutional transfer of oversight and discipline by the Minnesota Legislature to the Minnesota Judiciary, this writer confidently asserts that the failure of other Judges to criticize Judge David L. Knutson evidence their complicity in a Systemic Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, rather than vindication of the actions of Judge David L. Knutson.

And further, this writer asserts that this evidence of a Systemic Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice indicates that the failure of Public Schools to teach the Natural Law, upon which this country was founded, was by design and not oversight. Your Government wants docile Sheople, not vital, assertive, enterprising sovereign citizens that Natural Law creates. (This writer hopes you now plan to your local School Curriculum Review Board in the near future to correct this problem)

Clearly, as the very least, Judge David L. Knutson is horribly out of control and not adhering to the Rule of Law nor upholding the Unalienable Natural Rights of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki. Still we must ask:

  • Where is the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards?
  • Where is the Minnesota Attorney General?
  • Where is the FBI?
  • Where is the Minnesota Legislature which is constitutionally required to act as a check and balance upon the Judiciary and which is suppose to oversee and discipline judges?
  • Why do no clear and swift methods of redress exist for the egregious acts you have just read about?

Or is this just a shock and awe strategy by our Government? With the intent to force WE THE PEOPLE into the submissive role of Subject pursuant to the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings?

This writer would be remiss to not mention that Judge David L. Knutson entire course of action was predicated upon the dubious premise of “Parental Alienation”. One thought overwhelms this writer: Regardless of whether David Rucki threatened to kill just himself, or the entire family with a gun while they were seated at a table; is there any doubt that any alleged parental alienation was overwhelmingly caused by that single event rather than anything Sandra Grazzini-Rucki might be alleged have done?

Hopefully, this article has moved you to action. If all of us allow our fellow citizens to be savaged alone like this without attempting to show support, what will happen when you or yours find yourself in this position?

To repeat, this is a CALL TO ACTION to show support by attending the following hearing: Lawyer Michelle MacDonald’s hearing on January 27, 2014 Dakota County District Court, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN at 9 AM. State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, court file no. 19HA-CR-13-2934.

  • “First they came for the Jews, but I did nothing because I'm not a Jew. Then they came for the socialists, but I did nothing because I'm not a socialist. Then they came for the Catholics, but I did nothing because I'm not a Catholic. Finally, they came for me, but by then there was no one left to help me.”

Pastor Father Niemoller (1946)

If you can think of no other reason to show your support, this writer provides you with this observation:

29% of marriages of women age 15-44 end in divorce within 10 years….More recently, the divorce rates over a person’s life time have been estimated at 40%-50%. http://goo.gl/yW3aG; http://t.co/Kp3fn0JB2n

Though this writer would prefer not to disturb your marital bliss, this writer believes benefits of your being exposed to the facts in reality outweigh other considerations. To wit, the time to correct a corrupt and abusive court system is before you receive an adverse decision, not after. Further, after you receive an adverse Court decision, the Courts dismiss your criticism as the rantings of a disgruntled citizen merely upset over an adverse Court decision. And then there is your civic duty to ensure your other citizens unalienable, Natural Law Rights to Due Process and to receive justice pursuant to the Rule of Law, are not trampled by a rogue judicial system.

Wherever Law ends, Tyranny begins.

John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, Sec. 202

Again, at this time, this writer calls for just a show of support by attending this and other related court hearings. In so doing, we demonstrate our resolve to engage in peaceful remedies to redress of injustices exacted upon our fellow citizens. (In other jurisdictions, citizens have taken other actions like making citizen arrests of Judges in the Court Room. You can see an example in the video contained in this article http://goo.gl/tkIjRN or here http://goo.gl/2B6UsJ )

WE THE PEOPLE call upon the Minnesota Federal and State Courts to allow of these proceedings regarding Lawyer Michelle MacDonald, Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and David Rucki to be recorded by the press and private citizens. We call upon State Judge David L. Knutson to remove himself from this and related matters and/or draft and sign orders consistent with Due Process and the Rule of Law. We call for Lawyer Michelle MacDonald to charged with specific crimes or have this alleged criminal matter summarily dismissed. We call upon Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson to allow the litigation against State Judge David L. Knutson for violating the Constitutional, Civil and Unalienable Natural Rights of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki to go forward.

  • There are only 3 kinds of Judges and Politicians: 1) Those who are evil; 2) Those that follow those that are evil; 3) Those who are too cowardly, selfish or ineffective to confront and thwart those who are evil.

@DMashak on Twitter

Ms. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki has been deprived of her Unalienable Natural Law Right to a relationship with her children for more than 2 years now. The failure of Lawyers and Judges to come forward evidences that either complicity, or fear of consequences, and not a commitment to justice, controls their actions and behavior. This writer asserts that you should hold every Judge and Politician in the State of Minnesota accountable for not properly overseeing and disciplining the Judiciary, for not upholding the Rule of Law and, most specifically, for not providing a more expedient and affordable process for these types of matters to be quickly resolved.

  • “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

Martin Luther King Jr.

In as much as this exact same Judicial Abuse of Power could happen to you, this writer urges you to vote against every incumbent Minnesota Judge, Legislator and Governor for the next several elections to demonstrate the magnitude of your anger?

  • "The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule."

John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government. 1690

Finally, for those of you interested in joining this non-partisan effort to restore the Rule of Law, Natural Law, the Constitution and take back our country, may this writer suggest reading:

This writer hopes he sees you all at the Dakota County Courthouse on Monday Morning.

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Advertisement

News

  • Israel, Hamas clash in Gaza
    Hamas claims to have captured an IDF soldier on the bloodiest day of the conflict
    Video
    Video
  • Missing bodies
    38 bodies have not been found from the MH17 debris field in eastern Ukraine
    World News
  • Peeping Toms in NSA?
    Has the NSA seen you naked? Edward Snowden says it's not unlikely
    NSA
  • Autism study
    The newest, largest study on autism suggests that it mostly has to do with genetics
    Science
  • McIlroy takes Open
    Rory McIlroy hangs onto the lead and wins the 2014 British Open
    Sports
  • $23 billion payout
    A jury sides with the widow of a smoker, tobacco company shells out $23 billion
    Headlines