Skip to main content

See also:

Gina Loudon: Phony internet scandal may be the worst in history of the world

Gina Loudon
Gina LoudonFox Business

In a March 31, 2014 column for WorldNetDaily, Gina Loudon writes that the Obama administration's decision to forfeit Internet regulation to the United Nations "may be the most historic outrage in the history of this country, if not the world."

Obama is handing the global community the ability to control our speech, and our technological advances. The international body will have the ability to control us by controlling our speech, and we handed it to them. What are we getting in return?

This may be the most historic outrage in the history of this country, if not the world, and it happened while they entertained us with bread and circuses.

If the country doesn't wake up and find a way to throw these colluders with terrorists – these traitors – out of office, it will be too late. It may be time for us to seriously consider our options, very seriously.

History will record the truth. The next entity to control the Internet, space and nuclear technology will not be so good as the Americans, who have controlled it since its birth. It cannot be, because no republic shares our bedrock foundations of free speech and individual liberty. America is founded on principles that are reverent, grace-filled and believe the best in people, and for people. What will the Internet look like when it is controlled by people who believe the state comes first?

If this will be remembered historically for anything, however, it will be for the far-right infotainment complex's stubborn insistence on flat out lying about what actually happened over and over again.

What Loudon describes is the exact opposite of what actually happened, as has already been covered by this column twice, first when the claim was made by American Taliban conspiracy theorist Pamela Geller and a second time with Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice.

Yet despite having been corrected over and over, they insist on repeating the obvious lie for a third time.