Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Government

California's radical land use proposal

See also

The pending California State Senate Bill 1 would grant government that capacity to take private property if government officials decide it’s being used “inefficiently.” SB 1 is authored by California Senate Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento.

Two years ago Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature abolished local redevelopment funding in California in order to transfer $1.5 billion from local governments to the state and cover some of its chronic billion-dollar budget deficit.

SB 1 would reintroduce property redevelopment that would only apply to land uses that would comply with the 2008 “sustainable communities strategy” of SB 375.

SB 1 is really the financing and zoning vehicle for creating the new high-density “sustainable communities” lifestyle. SB 1’s “sustainable communities” would have to be high-density housing with restrictive parking, and buildings would have to be located within one-half mile of public transit ( “walkable communities”) or be green (solar or wind) energy manufacturing sites.

SB 1 would require counties and cities to create Sustainable Community Investment Authorities (SCIAs), which would be new government agencies separate from the governments that created them. The SCIAs would be established without citizen approvals or vote, and would be beyond direct citizen control. The SCIAs would also wield the authority of eminent domain property taking, and establish taxing districts and bond issuance for building such projects within SCIA jurisdiction. Such projects would have other specifications, including construction under prevailing union wages, and funding for subsidized housing.

In order to take private property for high-density sustainable development, SB1 expands the definition of “blight” to include a new concept of “inefficient use.” Under SB 1, “inefficiency” becomes the criteria for government control of private property rights. However, “inefficiency” is not clearly defined in the bill, nor are its alleged ill effects substantiated. Unfortunately, SCIAs would rely on the ill-defined concept of “inefficiency” to acquire property under eminent domain. (Cal Watchdog, August 2013)

It should be noted the UN's Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 produced a radical green policy initiative called “Agenda 21.” Agenda 21 outlines, in detail, the UN's vision for a centrally-managed and progressive global society. This initiative was signed by previous US presidents, and binds governments around the world to the UN's plan for controlling the way we live, eat, learn, move and communicate - all under the green banner of saving the earth. If fully implemented, Agenda 21 would have the government involved in every aspect of life of every human on earth.

SB 1 would be “California’s Agenda 21.” SB 1 has been placed on “inactive” status to be heard again in 2014.

Subscribe free to this Column by clicking the blue-highlighted +Subscribe line below author's title.

Advertisement

News

  •  One year later
    How victims have recovered a year after the Boston Marathon bombing
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Tax day freebies
    Everyone dreads tax day, but some businesses are offering deals today only
    Tax Day
  • Obamacare savings
    The rollout of Obamacare will cost $104 billion less than previously projected
    Top News
  • Blood Moon
    The first of four 'Blood Moons' came and went; is it the beginning of the end for mankind?
    Headlines
  • Arrest for threatening tweet
    A 14-year-old girl is arrested for issuing a threatening tweet towards American Airlines
    Strange News
  • Pistorius cross examination concludes
    Oscar Pistorius sheds more tears during the trial's final cross examination
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!