Skip to main content

See also:

Blaming NRA over killings shows no amount of laws enough for anti-gunners

Those looking to blame someone should start with the killer, and leave the rest of us alone.
Those looking to blame someone should start with the killer, and leave the rest of us alone.
Elliot Rodger/Facebook

Misplacing blame for the killing of his son in the Isla Vista murders, the father of one of the victims issued a grief-stricken attack on the National Rifle Association Saturday, The Los Angeles Times reported.

“Why did Chris die? Chris died because of craven, irresponsible politicians and the NRA,” Richard
Martinez told assembled reporters. “They talk about gun rights. What about Chris’ right to live? When will this insanity stop?”

The sentiments have been echoed by raving gun-grabbers on Twitter, where the tone is uglier. What’s emerging is something psychiatrist Sarah Thompson described as “Raging against Self-Defense,” that is, indignant slurs by people who bring neither facts nor logic nor anything but ignorance and hostility to the discussion. That said, those individuals have done gun owners an unintended service, because they clearly offer proof that no amount of “gun control,” for which California has been hailed as a leader by citizen disarmament groups, will ever be enough for them.

That everything currently being pushed on the national level as “common sense” and “reasonable” is already in place in California, that it proved wholly inadequate at stopping a determined, mad killer, and that this does not enter into what passes for their thought processes, shows they will not be satisfied until all guns are banned from private ownership. There can be no other conclusion.

It also shows they have no intention of actually engaging in that “national conversation on guns” the anti-gunners have fraudulently called for, when time after time they have demonstrated what they’re really interested in doing is dictating the terms of our surrender. That and being insulting.

So they’ve actually done us two services. They’ve not only shown us their end goals, and what a ridiculous lie every one of them who parrots the ubiquitous “No one wants to take your guns” talking point is telling, but they’ve also relieved us of any obligation to respond to them except in kind. Since it will do no good to point out all the existing checks and balances that were either ignored or proved useless, there’s really nothing left to say to those blaming this obscenity on gun owners.

Well, I can think of one thing, but I can’t post it here.

UPDATE: "Lawsuits likely outcome of Isla Vista ‘day of retribution’ killings" -- and they won't be against those the gun-haters say are to blame.


If you're a regular Gun Rights Examiner reader and believe it provides news and perspectives you won't find in the mainstream press, please subscribe to this column and help spread the word by sharing links, promoting it on social media like Facebook (David Codrea) and Twitter (@dcodrea), and telling your like-minded friends about it. And for more commentary, be sure to visit "The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance."


Isn’t it a little early to be talking about the 2014 elections? Not if you want to win. My latest GUNS Magazine "Rights Watch" column is online, and you can read it well before the issue hits the stands. Click here to read "Get Out The Vote -- Especially Your Own!


My latest JPFO alert notes a whole lot of projection going on. See “Author, Hollywood screenwriter and veteran says he could kill again over guns” and witness homicidal rage from someone “in the business” who doesn’t want you to have a gun.