
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Sandy Berger, who stole highly classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, destroyed them and lied to investigators, is now an adviser to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Berger, who was fired from John Kerry’s presidential campaign when the scandal broke in 2004, has assumed a similar role in Clinton’s campaign, even though his security clearance has been suspended until September 2008. This is raising eyebrows even among Clinton’s admirers.
“It shows poor judgment and a lack of regard for Berger’s serious misdeeds,” said law professor Jonathan Adler of Case Western Reserve University, who nonetheless called Clinton “by far the most impressive candidate in the Democratic field.”
Adler told The Examiner that it is “simply incomprehensible to me that a serious contender for the presidency would rely upon him as a key foreign policy advisor.”
He added: “If Senator Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee, at some point she will begin to receive national security briefings that will include sensitive information. At such a point, continuing to keep Berger on board as a key advisor, where he might have access to sensitive material, would be beyond incomprehensible.”
The Clinton campaign declined to comment.
Berger has admitted stealing documents from the National Archives in advance of the 9/11 Commission hearings in 2003. The documents, written by White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, were a “tough review” of the Clinton administration’s shortcomings in dealing with terrorism, Clarke’s lawyer told the Washington Post.
On several occasions, Berger stuffed highly classified documents into his pants and socks before spiriting them out of the Archives building in Washington, according to investigators. On one occasion, upon reaching the street, he hid documents under a construction trailer after checking the windows of the Archives and Justice Department buildings to make sure he was not being watched.
Berger came back later and retrieved the documents, taking them home and cutting them up with scissors. Two days later, he was informed by Archive employees that his removal of documents had been detected.
“Berger panicked because he realized he was caught,” said a report by the National Archives inspector general, which also recounted his initial reaction. “Berger lied.”
Berger also lied to the public, telling reporters he made an “honest mistake” by “inadvertently” taking the documents, which he blamed on his own “sloppiness.” Bill Clinton vouched for the explanation for Berger, who served as his national security adviser.
Berger later conceded: “I was giving a benign explanation for what was not benign.”
The Justice Department initially said Berger stole only copies of classified documents and not originals. But the House Government Reform Committee later revealed that an unsupervised Berger had been given access to classified files of original, uncopied, uninventoried documents on terrorism. Several Archives officials acknowledged that Berger could have stolen any number of items and they “would never know what, if any, original documents were missing.”
At his sentencing in September 2005, Berger was fined $50,000, placed on probation for two years and stripped of his security clearance for three years.
dcexamiNation and poll: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?
# 1,252 of 4,690 |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:57 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
1:10 PM MST on Sun., May. 18, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
6:05 PM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
4:54 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
11:51 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
11:09 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
10:25 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
9:18 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:54 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:40 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
3:37 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
10:04 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
9:28 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
3:00 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 29, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
2:47 PM MST on Sun., Nov. 11, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
11:50 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 8, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
11:37 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 8, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
2:36 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 27, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:42 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 23, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
11:26 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
4:12 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
5:50 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 11, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
9:36 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:10 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
1:21 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
9:21 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
2:48 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
1:06 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
7:35 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
12:27 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
10:01 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:52 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:29 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
8:15 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
7:25 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
6:50 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
6:34 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
6:23 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
6:06 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
5:25 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
5:03 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
4:52 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
4:31 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
4:29 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
4:20 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
2:56 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I would just like to make a couple of comments on charlie Hurtful and his hitting some one when there down comments on Hillary Clinton.It seems he didn't really make much of an effort on his story. Calling her self centered and in fantasy land where I believe he should be working instead of at the examiner.She worked hard to almost become the nations first female president and the way I was raised you don't talk about women of her stacher.Your the one Mr. hurt that delusional If anyone is self centered it's you .why don't you stop and think how hard shes worked for our country I find it refreshing, without any comments from the peanut gallery. So why don't you start acting like a journalist and stop acting like a spoiled bratt.Maybe you should try doing your job with objectivity.And my wife seems to think and I agree that your not worthy to be a pimple on her, well you know where.This is american History and your treating like its a dog and pony show.You should be shamed of your
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Isn't it amazing that Mr. Berger will be allowed to obtain a security clearance in three years. He was never required to tell Congress or the FBI the nature of the documents he destroyed! Why was the FBI was not notified about the breech of security. Instead of worrying about what professional baseball players used steroids, I would imagine these types of crimes would be more important,("Who's on First").If I as a mere mortal had taken these documents a lenghty prison term would be in my future. We need accountability in government!
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
peter knockstead said:
Bill, good article--thanks for covering this. I am reading Clinton in Exile and was shocked to learn that Berger got such a light sentence. What a disgrace. Should this guy ever get back his security clearance? It's hard to believe that Hillary would think it prudent to have this guy as an official or unofficial advisor to her campaign. Very disappointing
7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Government Worker said:
I'm starting to think that most of America subconciously longs for a monarchy. Why else would we put ourselves in the position to be ruled by the same families over and over again? We are probably all watching a glorified version of a rigged episode of Family Feud.
9 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Of course Sandy Berger is back. He took a risk and paid a (minor) price for stealing documents to cover Bill Clinton's record. Does anyone think he hadn't been promised a payoff? If you doubt this, I have a bridge to sell you.
12 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Same Old Same Old said:
And she wonders why she is losing...idiotic
14 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Shannon Williams said:
It is an unfortunate choice. One choice among many her campaign has made that is pushing me closer to Obama every day. Sad.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mockery said:
The Clintons can get away with anything because their supporters forgive them for every crime they commit. If Hillary pulled out a gun and shot someone in front of my mother-in-law she would say, "Oh look, that's girl's a fighter!" And her voice would full of admiration and wonder. Clinton supporters are like that, and it sucks for those of us that are not ignorant.
17 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You have got to be kidding me and they want to tarnish Barack with race. Now look whos being Deceitful.
9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
JFrink said:
Sounds like Hillary is looking for a steady hand to help her with her questionable refusal to release sensitive documents such as her tax returns. This is exactly the kind of shady character who can help her "misplace" some of that sensitive material.
17 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this out, communist rats all of them. What a sad ending to the greatest heroes of WW 2 to see these self indulgent, power hungry, emotionally and spiritually deprived losers telling our country lies in order to gain power. Ultimately they will end up in Hell.
123 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
NJ said:
Hey this guy should be behind bars for tampering with classified documents. Imagine if it was one of us. So think before you VOTE!!!
118 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Are you kidding me, Is this some kind of a Joke?Is this man really an advisor of Hillary's campaign? If so I am voting for Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!! "On several occasions, Berger stuffed highly classified documents into his pants and socks before spiriting them out of the Archives building in Washington, according to investigators"
133 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To everyone out there supporting Hillary and Bill Clinton - is this what you want from your leader? We can do better! Please don't just vote for Hillary because she's a woman, or because you seem to think everything was glorious under the Clinton Admin - it wasn't. Scandals and lies were a large part of Bill's 8 years. Hillary can't win the general election - so VOTE wisely. Look beyond the spin and you'll see the true Clintons - and it's not good.
115 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
HILLARY SUPPORTS - Why would you support such a candidate? Another example of poor judgment. Please looks at the real record.
109 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think he is perfect for the job, his morals are on par with the Clintons.
184 agree | 176 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Think of this. If you were a terrorist which Party would you want in the White House? The one which wants the Americans out of Iraq,etc.,so the terrorists can move in & take over ....OR, the party which is determined and willing to fight them in order to give people of another country the opportunity to enjoy the same freedoms we have? I am sure the people prefer freedom and a more peaceful life than one of terrorist rule.Wake up America! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out. Hillary & her running mates, want troops home NOW. Talks out of both sides of her mouth. Put America first, and put politic aside for a change. Can't trust the Clintons! Can't common sense rule? I am ashamed of our present Congress!What happened to all that "bipartisanship" we were promised???? I've never witnessed such childish behavior by adults who wish to be addressed an "Honorable." I'm afraid I see few truly honorable men and women in Congress today. DIVIDED WE FALL; UNITED WE STAN
207 agree | 219 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eddie said:
When I wrote the letter demanding when becoming the main cracker,to do Civil Rights and if he done the civil rights he'd be in office for 24yrs.and that's him doing 8yrs.then AL,do his 8yrs.only with the enacting of civil rights,and then your wife could become it,but only in the implementing of this Civil Rights Act of 1964,instead he chose Jesse Jack yellow slave boy,instead of the[CRA]and it nearly cost them their lives,and you all witnessed it and Jesse got an extended family from Bubba Bill,Bill only got a screw,that could of been his head,so why would America put these unpatriotic bunch of sell outs back in and made friends with the sell out that was up to defraud people,ciitizens of their VOTES,so that's where Jesse is with white America,now he's got Al dull boy and Martin the 3rd,walking around an unjust bldg.Eddie nedds help hoisting civil rights and invite all serious inquiries,that's Black conscience,and that's none of you and a piece of pork rib for Clarence Thomas
241 agree | 288 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eddie said:
I'm needing to know if this is the whitey that perhaps is the destroyer of some important documents that I sent to the Clinton/Gore campaign,prior of them becoming a public nuisance,and it tells you that he chose Jesse Jack Yellow face boy and the slave hold and votes you can do to all colored people in America for sure cause he's in charge and nothing nobody can do without civil rights and he had that coveredsince 1968,in the slaying of King Jr.so CIvil RIghts were demanded by Eddie in the one of 2letters Bill Bubba sent I in his nizing of flesh,and never thought of IMPLEMENTING the provisions in the TITLES of The Acts,so if this guy destroyed those records after the signed letters of Bubba Bill to I anbd his secretary,Ms.Washington whom I'm sure he was banging,like also knowing of the TYRANNCY of ever person in and on Cracker Hill,and Al Gore having the same bunch of redneck racist committ FRAUD in hostilly hoisting Bush into such scornful and unqualified seat,knew Al was soft...
272 agree | 302 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader#whatever said:
In 05, Berger at first had said it was an "honest mistake," then pleaded guilty. So he lied, covering it up while he could. True, he didn't bug or break into anyone's property or "destroy a candidate of the other party." But in stealing what was illegal to take, he was attempting to do the latter, whether admitting to it or not. He just got caught before he could do anything with it, really. Unlike Liddy, McCord, Segretti, Haldeman, Ehrlichman et. al. "Clinton National Security Adviser" vs. "GOP security aide." The former got caught too soon to wreak the havoc the latter wrought. One is no better than the other. Yet only one gets a $50,000 slap on the wrist and accelerated rehabilitation, walking a free, employable man to regain his classified access in three years: which is one year from now: PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TIME. It floors me that some still refuse to accept this double standard, both in the left-liberal media and the national judicial/political system.
266 agree | 229 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In my opinion, the Clinton Administration was very corrupt; Sandy Berger is also corrupt and I believe he did some shady things while associated with the Clinton Administration. I believe now that he is working for the Clintons again "because they owe him." I would never believe anything that SAndy Berger, Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton would say.
354 agree | 283 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
cabdriver said:
"Sandy Berger is a zionist. you might want to check out who is real friends are. they do not live in the US. They live in Israel and have both sides of washington in their pocket." Ah, an old comeback from the Misdirection Hit Parade...conspiracy and collusion may well figure in this affair, but blaming it all on string-pullers in Israel blackmailing their Gentile victims is just another string-along. Anyway, judging from the feedback on the comment, the "theory" seems to be doing well with the readers...no doubt, many prefer easy comic-book answers to being confused with facts.
215 agree | 271 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
He's a perfect fit for the Clintons
257 agree | 263 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
...birds of a feather flock together.
330 agree | 386 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
It's Jo said:
To learn what the REAL Hillary was/is all about, and those she 'rules' I suggest you read the place I found yesterday online: 1984ArkansasMotherOfTheYear.com It will give you some background to what lengths she will go to achieve her goal of 'ruling in the Whitehouse-even though she fools so many along the way. Bill Clinton was first for the Presidency, and their deal was: "Hillary is Second to Run". It was their special deal from when they first got together-helping each other in their 'business/oriented/marriage? The articles written are EYE OPENERS, and it's no wonder, Hillary wants to control the internet. The Clinton-Mud -Machine, works 24/7 to smear, bully, and rid itself of those who stand in their way of lusting for Power/Money that they Lust after once again. These two are dangerous, and Hillary is worse than Bill, whose past dalliances are part of the record, and Hillary sets out to "eliminate these women by smearing/attacking their character w/MSM"
396 agree | 365 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
why did the bush justice dpt go so light on Sandy? Maybe those docs had something in them Bush did not like as well. Sandy Berger is a zionist. you might want to check out who is real friends are. they do not live in the US. They live in Israel and have both sides of washington in their pocket. makes me wonder what was really in those docs. I lean to more incriminating evidence against the Israel lobby and intelligence.
405 agree | 428 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader: Independent Voter said:
As I read the article, two possibiities occured to me; 1. This was a giant political 'mis-step' for HRC, who normally has good political instincts. 2. It may be that she so totally believes she has both the Democratic party nomination and the American public in her pocket that she no longer cares what we think.
337 agree | 411 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
UK Resident said:
people like sandy bereger can get away with such blatant misconduct against the people of America and survive a powerful seat because they underestimate the intellect of the American people... they must really think your all dumb
306 agree | 437 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
cabdriver said:
"...the Incompetent Partisan Hacks of the Flunky USDOJ! They are the ones who administered the "slap on the wrist" to Sandy. I wouldn't be surprised if those Clinton Appointees..." John Ashcroft? Alberto Gonzalez? My best guess: mutual blackmail. For every document Berger took incriminating Clinton, he also took one on either George W. Bush, or George H. W. Bush. Hence, the "deal"... But that's only a guess, since we, the American public, aren't being told anything, and no one in the media seems to want to ask direct questions. Instead, it's gone into the Demo/Repub Partisan Pundit Spin Cycles, where each "side" ignores any information that they find troubling. When any of that does get addressed, it's usually rushed off of the stage with unconvincing explanations. Hokey- not to mention bad news for those of us who simply want the truth about what's actually going on.
456 agree | 417 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
One more angle on the Sandy Berger debacle.. Right before the 2006 elections, Congressman Curt Weldon(R) had promised Michael Savage that he was about to find out specificaly which documents Berger had stolen, then he would be back to share his findings.. No doubt, that is the reason why Weldon was soon targeted by a major partisian attack on his integrity, which included the Pukes of the usdoj. Obviously, it was an agenda driven smear job.. similar to what the Dems have recently launched against Rush Limbaugh.. In Weldon's case, they won. Fortunately, this dirty trick is now under FBI investigation. Anyway,I wouldn't put Anything past those "Progressives"..
415 agree | 391 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tony said:
The Arrogance of Hillary. Is this a hint of what her cabinet will look like????
250 agree | 386 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Look for the book "Relentless" coming out soon. It will tell you all about why this stuff keeps happening and how to get rid of these people from the political scene.
333 agree | 386 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Who to say that Burger distroyed the papers and not gave them to the Clinton's,he is such a truthful"person This is PayBack.
372 agree | 415 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
mark said:
Is Henry Waxman going to investigate this? I guess he's too busy with his talk radio investigation. I hope the American voter is smarter than these people seem to think. I was wrong before, I thought the Spector jury was smart.
432 agree | 385 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why don't you put Berger in jail instead of giving him job at the campaign? He did no better that Libby Scooter. Even worse.
333 agree | 429 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is an outrage, first I thought Democrats were talking about the corruption in the Republican party, what about the traitors in the Democrat party, like Sany Berger for stealing important in the archives when the 9/11 commission was going on. He should have been put in prison for what he did, and others like Durbin, Kerry, Murtha.
405 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Revoke Sandy's security clearance just like GW revoked Rove's for violating the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement. Not one ounce of integrity or honesty in GW's 30th percentile club I tell you. Not one ounce!
389 agree | 440 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This man should NEVER be allowed security clearance again !!!!
400 agree | 416 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dixie said:
Considering how Sandy broke federal laws and slimed himself for Bill & Hill, and considering what he's got on Them....They had better keep Sandy Baby close, and keep him happy..lol
313 agree | 403 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
REPULICANALLTHEWAY said:
It will be a sad day for Americans if the Clinton team is reelected. I thought that you could only run for President for 2 terms, so why can Hillary be elected again? Bill sucked as the Govenor of Arkansas!! Most people in the state of Arkansas did not vote for him, because we knew what a peice of poo he really was. He has always been a lier, and he made our country look really bad while he was in office. There is an old saying "screw me once shame on you, screw me twice shame on me." Wake up Americans, don't let them screw us twice!! Have a set of balls and say enough is enough. We need someone in office who is going to stand up for our country, not dodge the bullet, and then lie about it when they get caught. How many lies did Clinton tell while he was in office, not to mention the lies before, and after? Do you think Hillary is any different? She is married to him, obviously she agrees with him. She is still standing beside him. What does that say about her? Think about it!!!!
397 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
cabdriver said:
LOL As long as some much fantasy and speculation is in the mix, let's just take it a step further...maybe Berger has been the Shadow President for the last 20 years.
382 agree | 417 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Wonder what Sandy's holding over Hillary's head?" Whatever it is, he had better be a lot more careful in protecting it than he was in stealing it or he'll soon be talking to Vince Foster.
333 agree | 400 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
cabdriver said:
To the guy who said "Hey cabdriver.....thinking like you do is why you drive a cab"- a couple of points. 1) Maybe I don't drive a cab. Although maybe I did. 2) Maybe some people drive cabs because it's a profession with more freedom and integrity than alternatives that involve tossing ones ability to think for oneself in the trash in order to sell out and become a groupthinking pawn. The general level of political commentary around here sounds like little kids fantasizing about the villains and heroes on Saturday morning television cartoons.
416 agree | 400 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am not surprise that Sandy Berger is in Hillary team. For whom do you think Mr Berger stuffed highly classified documents into his pants and socks and later destroyed? Of course, it was for Clinton! He was trying to protect the Clinton Administration, so that Hillary now can say "my husband did everything he could to protect American and 9/11 was Bush's fault". And now Hillary rewards Mr Berger for his protection of her husband. What's a bunch of crook!
390 agree | 406 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This confirms that he was on a mission for Bill. This case would have been a better use of a Special Prosecuter than the one against Libby.
339 agree | 410 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bob said:
It's true,it's true! Birds of a feather do flock together.
406 agree | 398 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Chuck Tiller Newstalk 1070 KNTH Houston said:
For the conservatives who want to make another failed 3rd party attempt at the presidency, this should be a warning! The vote will split and SHE will win! Think about it. Do we really want the Clinton's in power again? What was in those documents that Berger thieved? They have the nerve and gall to think the American public will let this pass. If that happens, there will be many repercussions from the folks who want to resurrect the so-called Fairness Doctrine. By the way, that doctrine is not just about talk radio. What about Christian radio? The left considers religion as a point of view. Christian radio would become diluted. If a Christian program airs, the the same amount of time would have to be offered to other faiths. In case some have forgotten, Hillary was once quoted as saying there should be a gatekeeper on the internet. They wont stop at radio to silence the voices on the right. We cannot let hardheadedness allow Clinton to win.
418 agree | 403 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I see the phrase; "How dumb do you think we are?" posted a few times in these responses. Folks, if we are being honest, we have to admit that a large percentage of our citizens ARE dumb. It is clearly obvious that the "dumbing down" of the masses is what has facilitated any political success' the left has enjoyed during the last couple of decades. As it is with Hollywood and TV, so it is with the political strategies of the left. -Market it hard and long enough, and the masses will eventually fall for it...irregardless of the truth of an issue. No matter if their product is worthy or not...it only matters that they sell it. And whatever it takes to sell it is what has to be done. The Democrat left recognizes just how many of our citizens are completely dumb, and they use this fact as the backbone of their whole leftist culture.
427 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
maybe he'll be able to get the white house silver-ware ....
396 agree | 417 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
They are two rats who deserve each other.
336 agree | 377 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree