Examiners

Jay McDonough
Progressive Politics Examiner
Most Recent Post
A PIcture for the Day

California News

Multimedia News

LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...
Sexiest men alive
20 photos
In this July 25, 2008 file photo, San Diego C...

Md. suing to halt SCHIP veto

Oct 2, 2007 12:00 AM (375 days ago) by Len Lazarick, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Maryland will join seven states in a lawsuit that aims to stop the Bush administration from stripping health insurance nationwide from hundreds of thousands of children, Gov. Martin O’Malley said Monday.

O’Malley also joined legislators and members of the congressional delegation requesting President Bush not to veto an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program passed by overwhelming majorities. Bush has threatened to do so because of its $35 billion cost and its extension to some families who are not in need.

The states’ lawsuit will allege that new federal rules paring Medicaid rolls violate the law, because they were implemented with no public comment. The regulations would knock 800,000 children off the Medicaid rolls for health insurance, according to U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, of southern Maryland.

In Maryland, 4,000 families would lose their coverage, he said.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Under the expansion of SCHIP passed by the House and Senate, 42,000 additional Maryland children could be added to the program, which already serves 100,000, according to the Maryland House speaker’s office.

Hoyer said Bush’s possible veto would violate the president’s 2004 campaign promise to expand the program. “This is what you promised to do if re-elected, Mr. President,” Hoyer said. “This bill is paid for” with new taxes.

“Maryland has probably a greater risk in this than other states,” said state House Speaker Michael Busch, who helped win passage of the state’s expansion of children’s health insurance a decade ago.

The poster boy for the rally was 12-year-old Graeme Frost, who gave the Democrats’ response to Bush’s national radio address Saturday. The Baltimore boy and his family were in a serious car crash three years ago that put Graeme in the hospital for 5 1/2 months, but he said he and his sister were fortunate to be covered by SCHIP.

On Monday, Graeme read a letter to Bush, requesting a meeting to explain his situation. He wrote a similar letter to Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-6th, the only Maryland member of Congress to vote against reauthorizing the children’s health insurance program.

Responding to Graeme’s letter, Bartlett, whose district includes parts of Harford, Baltimore and Carroll counties, told The Examiner: “I’m proud that I voted to create the SCHIP program in 1997 that helped Graeme and his sister in 2004. I want to help the working poor, but Democrats are demanding that SCHIP be expanded to have government-controlled, taxpayer-paid health care for millions of children who already have private health coverage.”

llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:09 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 4, 2007 re: "Democrats move to override veto of children’s health care measure"

Art B said:
Bush is right. The social security entitlement is broke. The medicare entitlement is broke. So lets create another one, which will soon be broke. We never hear anything about how much this will cost (clue -- lots). There arent enough smokers to pay for it and even if there were, what did they do to deserve this kind of punishment? How many non-payers will get "equal" benefits (I suppose they consider "parents" income to decide who pays, since ALL children are not able to pay by definition). The principal of all govt aid is that the more you "have", the less you "get". So to "get" the most, you need to appear to "have" nothing. What incentive is there for folks to get an education, work hard, and save their money for a better life if its just going to be taken from them and given to folks who have not done these things? Communism 101.

175 agree | 170 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement