Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Class action abuses may have been “substantially reduced by the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005,” said James Copland, director of the Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute.
But that doesn’t mean outrageous settlements have become a thing of the past. Class action lawsuits remain among the favored big-ticket paths to fame and riches for trial lawyers. Attorneys fees can range anywhere from 15 to more than 30 percent of a settlement, and courts have tremendous discretion in awarding both fees and allowable attorneys costs in a case, which means a sympathetic judge can be the key to a lucrative outcome.
Here are some of the worst examples:
» TrialLawyersInc.com reports that the 1998 tobacco settlements “were nothing but egregious (as) some 300 lawyers from 86 firms will pocket as much as $30 billion over the next 25 years.” That’s taxpayer money, the site reports — “enough to hire 750,000 teachers.”
» The year 2006 saw record levels in securities’ class action settlements, according to separate reports from Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, which reported the amount surpassed $18 billion.
Among the firms taking the lion’s share of those settlements were Coughlin, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins, with more than $7 billion, and Milberg Weiss, which netted $1.6 billion, New York Law Journal reported in March.
» Since the 1970s, lead paint levels in children’s blood has been dropping — but what’s not is the dollar amount affixed to suits against paint manufacturers. “After years of unsuccessful efforts, the litigation industry’s hopes of extracting money from paint makers began to look promising when the trial bar won a major victory last year,” TrialLawyersInc.com reported in July.
Though lead paint for interior walls hasn’t been manufactured in this nation since the 1950s, a Rhode Island court ordered three leading companies to clean the offensive material from roughly 240,000 buildings, at an estimated cost of $3 billion. The South Carolina-based Motley Rice law firm will collect settlements of at least 16 percent on the cases that result.
» The Halliburton Company settled about 300,000 cases of asbestos claims by setting aside a $4 billion fund after it purchased a new engineering company and inherited the legal challenges.
“Asbestos cases really are high-dollar,” said Copland. Trial lawyers raking in the millions include Ronal Motley, of Motley Rice; Peter Angelos, of the Maryland firm bearing his name, and Fred Baron, founder of the Texas Baron & Budd.
» Class action suits targeting the fen-phen diet pill initially cost Wyeth, formerly known as American Home Products, $14 billion. But that amount has since climbed to $21 billion, TrialLawyersInc.com reported.
Fen-phen cases have been extremely lucrative for trial attorneys: Elizabeth Cabraser helped bring in millions for her California firm, for example, and Stan Chesley of Cincinnati collected more than $20 million, even though he had little-to-no direct contact with case clients, according to the Louisville, Ky., Courier-Journal.
» Related to tobacco suits are class action suits against the makers of smokeless tobacco products like Copenhagen and Skoal. Lawyers and Settlements reports a Sept. 3 update on the antitrust suit brought by a competitor of the Copenhagen maker, Conwood Company, that resulted in an initial damages award of $350 million, and a final finding of more than $1 billion under federal antitrust laws.
The settlement calls for UST, Inc., the maker of Copenhagen and Skoal, to dole out $816 coupons for each claimant to make future purchases of the smokeless product, at an estimated total cost of $65 million — and $17 million more in legal fees.
"Lawyers Gone Wild" is a series of special reports by The Examiner looking at the cost and consequences of class action lawsuit abuse in the United States. Read the latest articles in the series.



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:21 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 23, 2008 re: "Donations from lawyers sometimes spell trouble"
Report as inappropriate
2:19 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 23, 2008
re: "Donations from lawyers sometimes spell trouble"
Report as inappropriate
6:10 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 20, 2008
re: "Democratic rivals mum on firm’s dirty cash"
Report as inappropriate
8:16 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008
re: "Just the threat of a lawsuit can be worth millions"
Report as inappropriate
1:08 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 3, 2007
re: "How important are judges?"
Report as inappropriate
2:18 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007
re: "How important are judges?"
Report as inappropriate
2:16 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007
re: "How important are judges?"
Report as inappropriate
2:01 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007
re: "How important are judges?"
Report as inappropriate
11:18 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007
re: "How important are judges?"
Report as inappropriate
11:03 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007
re: "Donations from lawyers sometimes spell trouble"
Report as inappropriate
1:08 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 15, 2007
re: "High-dollar settlements mark class action cases"
Report as inappropriate
4:17 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007
re: "High-dollar settlements mark class action cases"
Report as inappropriate
Nancy Wallace said:
Joe Biden loves Lawyers and Lawsuits and keeping the poor in bankrupcty. Biden supports birds of prey, they prey on the weak.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Lawsuit Victim said:
Biden has turned this country into a million lawsuits. Biden lawsuits, biden lawsuits, biden lawsuits, biden lawsuits, biden lawsuits Biden costs all american money, to line lawyers pockets. This has killed jobs
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe said:
Hillary Clinton is only honest when she gets caught, and then, not always.
11 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
My attorney did not to help my case against a city in RI, no investigation, no interviews, no discovery.How do I sue him for not doing the job I hired him to do? Swansong
8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Steve White said:
I'm glad to read this series, but I also think there should be a lot more attention paid, not to how big companies get screwed over by the legal system, but how normal people without big money get abused in civil lawsuits, divorce cases, child custody, etc. The Constitution says you have a right to represent yourself in court, maybe the courts should facilitate that, rather than trying to make it hard.
173 agree | 167 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why is the Judicial Hellholes report making such a big deal about a quote that is from a book that was 8 years old at the time of the report? Why are you making such a big deal about that quote, and why do you seem to be blindly relying on a report that so blatantly misuses and misunderstands the quote?
168 agree | 180 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So this Judicial Hellholes report seems to be where you got the Judge Neely quote, and they do the same thing with it. They ignore the fact that Neely's book supports at least some of their points, and twist the quote to support their cause. This tells me that maybe the Judicial Hellholes report that you seem to have fallen in love with is probably not very accurate or reliable.
192 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Your quote from Judge Neely is ridiculous. It is totally out of context. It was taken from a 1998 book in which he argues that product liability law has gotten out of hand and that state courts are helping home state plaintiffs at the expense of out state companies. His book is, at least partially and most likely more honestly, arguing your point. But you feel compelled to quote him out of context, to argue a point that is the opposite of his book's conclusion. He actually calls for the US Supreme Court to step in and review state court decisions to make sure they are fair to out of state companies. I sure hope this was an honest mistake by you, Ms. Chumley.
160 agree | 154 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
not me said:
this article is so insanely one-sided. for example, what of all the money that defense firms give to judges who they think will help them?
176 agree | 179 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Say it isn't so. Trial lawyers convicted of crimes contributing to Democrat candidates and Democrat causes. Here I though that the Democrat controlled Congress (the opposite of Progress) was going to fix all of that!!!! No wonder Congress has half the approval ratings of the President.
191 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is difficult to determine how reasonable these fees are without knowing more about the amount of work required to achieve these settements and the amount of risk taken by these lawyers. In general, the amounts seem high, but aren't these fees the result of contracts negotiated between the lawyers and their clients? If the governrment starts putting caps on these fees, will it then try to cap the salaries and binuses paid to corporate CEOs?
185 agree | 224 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nice series of stories. OK, I can see that these lawyers and law firms are making obscene amounts of money off of suits and settlements. But what about the problem of lead paint, even if it was painted decades ago? If it's hurting people, shouldn't it be cleaned up? So how can we protect citizens and prevent abuse at the same time?
245 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree