Examiner.com // 1 hr 58 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 4 hrs ago
ABC7.com // 4 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 4 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 4 hrs ago
Examiner.com // 5 hrs ago
Daily News // 6 hrs ago
Daily News // 6 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 6 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 6 hrs ago
 
   
Rogues gallery of class action attorneys
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Washington DC (Map, News) - When The Examiner asked legal experts across the country who are top lawyers specializing in filing bigtime class action lawsuits against Fortune 500 companies, public institutions, prominent individuals and small businesses, a dozen names kept coming up.

These are the trial lawyers who win the billion-dollar settlements, generate headlines in newspapers across the country and often become political powers unto themselves.

Melvyn Weiss

The founding partner of Milberg Weiss is at the center of the federal prosecution of the firm bearing his name for an alleged kickback scheme designed to income for Weiss and other partners. Two former partners have since pleaded guilty, including Steven Schulman and David Bershad, with the latter described by federal authorities as having kept large amounts of cash in a safe in the firm’s office for use in the kickback scheme. Even so, Weiss has led the firm most closely associated with aggressive class action suits that have resulted in verdicts and settlements worth more than $1 billion against banking and insurance companies; $775 million in a single utility company securities case; and another $300 million in a healthcare securities suit. No wonder a recent Manhattan Institute report said Weiss has "never met a stock-price drop he didn’t like."

Mark Lanier

Lanier, founder of The Lanier Law Firm with offices in Houston and New York, is a "multi-multi-multi-millionaire," according to ATRA’s Schwartz. Lanier’s initial verdict against Merck in the Vioxx case was worth $250 million, but that was later reduced. Still, Lanier’s arguments were so influential that class action lawyers filing subsequent cases against the company used Lanier’s tactics and usually won or gained fat settlements. The National Law Journal listed Lanier as one of the nation’s top 10 trial lawyers last year and also numbered him among one of the 100 most influential tort attorneys overall, all despite the fact Lanier is under the age of 40. Lanier currently is a key player in the suits against lead paint manufacturers, and seeks medical monitoring for those who have purchased Mattel toys manufactured in China to determine if any health problems develop.

Peter Angelos

Angelos has run a Baltimore-based firm focusing on malpractice, products liability and personal injury actions for nearly 40 years, during which time he’s accumulated enough wealth to become principal owner of the Baltimore Orioles. He filed some of the first asbestos suits, winning roughly $100 million in the process. Angelos also represented Maryland in the tobacco cases against Phillip Morris, and subsequently fattened his firm’s bottom line with lucrative suits against Wyeth, maker of the diet drug fen-phen. Next on his list: Lead paint manufacturers and cell phone makers. "He’s thrown his weight around for a long time," said Olson.

William Lerach

William Lerach recently retired after a career in which he became one of the country’s most successful securities attorneys, with firm awards of more than $1 billion against various corporations. His name was dropped last month from the California-based firm he founded when he split from a former East Coast partner, Melvyn Weiss. Lerach has been repeatedly linked in media reports about the federal prosecution of Milberg Weiss as one of the key unnamed witnesses, most recently as having rejected a plea bargain.

Ronald Motley

Motley, founding partner of the South Carolina-based Motley Rice firm, wrote the book on winning asbestos cases -- literally. Following his lead status as asbestos litigator beginning in the 1970s, and his receipt of millions in the tobacco cases of the 1990s, Motley authored the guide, "How to Handle an Asbestos Case," as well as the later "Decades of Deception: Secrets of Lead, Asbestos and Tobacco." He’s now applying many of the same lessons to lead paint litigation. "He is the one running the lead paint litigation in Rhode Island," said Victor Schwartz, a partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon and general counsel for the American Tort Reform Association. "He’s a very intense and wealthy personal injury lawyer."

John O’Quinn

O’Quinn, partner in his Texas O’Quinn Law Firm, made a name for himself with suits against tobacco companies and breast implant manufacturers that resulted in mega-dollar awards. But he also has garnered headlines following a decision by an arbitration panel that he wrongfully withheld nearly $19 million of breast implant settlement money from his clients, and a subsequent federal court order demanded he address possible contempt of court charges against his firm. This was not O’Quinn’s first scuffle with the law. In 1989, he was reprimanded by the state bar over claims his firm solicited clients in an unethical manner.

Jerome ‘Jere’ Beasley

Beasley, senior member of the Alabama firm, Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, PC, and former lieutenant governor of the state, was also co-lead counsel in an $11+ billion punitive award against ExxonMobil Corp. for breach of contract. His firm biography credits him with securing more than $1 million in verdicts on each of his 30 court trials, with half of those exceeding $15 million. Beasley has been doing class action suits for more than 30 years, leading Overlawyered.com’s Walter Olson to observe that the Alabama attorney "still deserves the reputation."

Richard ‘Dickie’ Scruggs

Scruggs, brother-in-law to former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, is a Mississippi trial attorney known for his legal attacks against tobacco companies in the 1990s that led to initial settlements worth more than $360 billion. He has also filed significant actions against companies associated with asbestos and Ritalin issues, as well as a much-publicized case charging State Farm Fire and Casualty Company for "a pattern of racketeering" when its agents allegedly changed reports filed by Hurricane Katrina victims and wrongfully denied claims. Like Weiss and Lerach, Scruggs is battling his own federal demons. In August, a federal judge charged Scruggs with criminal contempt stemming from the State Farm, after he allegedly mishandled documents related to the claimants.

Steven Tillery

Tillery, of the St. Louis, Ill. firm Korein Tillery, was lead plaintiff’s attorney in a case against GlaxoSmithKline that resulted in a $63 million settlement -- 26 percent of which went to Tillery and other attorneys. A MadisonRecord.com report calculated that Tillery’s personal haul from the settlement was $16,8 million, while his individual clients each received the $15 they paid for the original prescription... if they could show a receipt. Tillery is not always successful however, as he failed in an attempt to revive a $10-billion fraud suit against Phillip Morris that had already been dismissed at the highest court levels.

Joseph Jamail

Jamail, of Jamail & Kolius in Texas, has a nickname that says it all: "The King of Torts." Known for challenging some of the nation’s largest corporations, Jamail’s $11-plus billion win in 1985 against Texaco earned him listing in the Guiness Book of World Records as counsel for the largest civil damages award ever. One case Jamail did not include in his book "Lawyer: My Trial and Jubilations" may prove to be his most interesting, as he represents plaintiffs suing O’Quinn for the nearly $19 million he was found to have wrongfully withheld from his breast implant clients, said Glenn Lammi, Washington Legal Foundation’s chief counsel. "There’s a little legal cannibalism going on right now." That case is in the appeal stages, he said.

Steve Berman

Berman, founder of the Seattle-based Hagens, Berman, Sobol, Shapiro firm, forged his reputation with $216 million in state settlements against tobacco firms, as well as via his work on other notable cases like Enron, Exxon’s Valdez oil spill and the Microsoft antitrust actions. But Glenn Lammi, chief counsel with the Washington Legal Foundation, points to Berman’s more recent suits against alcohol companies for using allegedly unlawful advertising to lure underage buyers as potential milestones, even though they’ve so far been dismissed.

Joseph Rice

Rice, a partner to Ronald Motley, should be recognized for his "prominence in the asbestos cases," said WLF’s Lammi. Rice is also widely recognized for landmark settlements between state attorney generals and tobacco companies, compelling the latter to pay the health care costs of smokers. He was also involved in the battle that erupted over fees paid to tobacco case lawyers, with a Washington Post report describing the $2.8 billion paid to the lawyers on an $11.3 billion Florida settlement.

Source: Various news reports; photos from AP and Getty Images

"Lawyers Gone Wild" is a series of special reports by The Examiner looking at the cost and consequences of class action lawsuit abuse in the United States. Read the latest articles in the series.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:32 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 27, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

P.R.K. said:
These LEECHES have ruined our economy.

127 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:47 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
The list doesnt include John Edwards...Made millions suing doctors.

113 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 29, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
Frivolous lawsuits of pure agenda, all should be thrown out of court and the plaintiffs should be sued by the court as criminals.

149 agree | 82 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:45 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 24, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Not as Stupid as Some said:
All this complaining about crooked lawyers....hopefully not from any registered DemoRATS. Passion for Hillary and contempt for greedy crooked lawyers? Wazup HYPOCRITES?

151 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:14 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 23, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
Rather, all politicians were once a lawyer.

100 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:12 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 23, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
The profession of "attorney at law" should be completely regulated by the federal government. Their earnings and wages should be rated according to a civil servant's GS level. Of course this could never actually happen since every rotten politician inevitably becomes a lawyer.

137 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:50 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 22, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Schratboy said:
You can always expect lawyers to defend other lawyers, even of the class-action variety. It's part of the social contract behavior that derived from a recessive cockroach gene.

131 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:47 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 22, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
These class action lawyers are the scum of the earth. I have nothing but contempt for what they do and their unctuous and vile smelling lives. They've wrought more pain and suffering on the populace, stealing the productivity of working Americans through their viper-like poisonous pens and courtroom buffoonery. Indeed, all these people would make ideal animals for lab experimentation. I don't even think PETA would object.

116 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:16 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Republican Lawyer said:
Money makes the world go ‘round, and although lawyers are profiting from these cases, so are their clients. Personal injury cases on this scale cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to litigate, and the lawyer does not get paid unless he wins. The fact is, we live in a capitalists society; not a socialist, welfare state. When is the last time any one of you jealous, petty, lazy, life-hating idiots contributed to society?

149 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:09 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Gabe said:
To all those who think trial lawyers are out to protect you from big corporatons, you better think again. What trial lawyer would honestly help you if they didn't think a large chunk of change could come they're way? The trial lawyers dont give a *blank* about you; its all about the money honey. And no it doesn't make America better, it makes it worse by raising the price of everything and especially our health insurance, you can thank your friends the trial lawyers for that. Greedy plantiffs and greedy lawyers are the only ones who win.

171 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:38 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
Greedy, Self-serving, Manipulating Trial Loyers..."lawyers"... Scum of the Earth!

151 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:57 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 15, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Examiner Reader said:
This is another piece of schlock, just badly researched, if at all. Take your piece on Mark Lanier. Anyone who knows anything about the Vioxx litigation knows that a) the personal injury claims are not part a class action and b) none of those cases are getting settled, much less for "fat" money. The manufacturer had adopted a policy of trying all the cases that are being filed against it, so the ones that are resulting in plaintiff's verdicts are the ones that a jury has found have merit -- just the opposite of being frivolous. I really wonder if you understand the legal system at all. I have read all of the recent "lawsuit abuse" articles, and if they were a high school term paper, I would give you a D -- bad research, poor understanding of the subject matter, and quite honestly, not very well written. That is at least one thing that you should be able to get right. Shame on you for putting this garbage out.

171 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:49 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

ALBERT said:
Trial lawyers are the only defense we have to protect American people against corrupt and greedy corporate America. You are my heroes.

141 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007 re: "Rogues gallery of class action attorneys"

Chuck said:
You forgot John Edwards. He has 50 million and all of it was from suing people and corporations. Now he wants to be President. Trial lawyers will back him for sure.

113 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.16 seconds)