Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Facing serious shortfalls in affordable housing, new plans for downtown skyscrapers and potential redevelopment in The City’s eastern neighborhoods, John Rahaim will take over as San Francisco planning director in 2008.
The Mayor’s Office announced Wednesday that Rahaim, the 52-year-old planning director in Seattle, would replace Dean Macris, who originally signed on to be interim planning director for three months but held the position for three years.
Macris will stay on as a special adviser to Rahaim, who is expected to start in early January.
In an interview with The Examiner, Rahaim said he toured The City with Mayor Gavin Newsom and other officials three weeks ago and was struck by the prospect of running a planning department in a city undergoing such rapid development.
“There’s an incredible opportunity to develop the old industrial areas along the eastern shore and in Mission Bay,” Rahaim said. “Most big cities don’t have that type of land bank available for development.”
During his eight-year career in Seattle, Rahaim guided a major revision of the downtown zoning that allowed for large increases in residential growth, a prevalent issue in The City, where there are five or six applications for new downtown office high-rises.
Rahaim worked on reclaiming the Seattle Central Waterfront with plans to remove the elevated Highway 99 viaduct, which is elevated much the way The Embarcadero once was. He also revamped major areas such as the South Lake Union community, where he focused on bringing in biotechnology developments, which The City is attempting to do at Mission Bay.
But Rahaim said he is well aware of the debates The City has over new skyscrapers and that those discussions were natural.
“There are places where they fit and others where they don’t. So you have to look at whether high-rises are appropriate in an area or some other form of development,” Rahaim said.
Gabriel Metcalf, the executive director of San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, a public policy think tank, said Rahaim “has his work cut out for him” and will have to be a bridge builder between planning staff, the Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors and the mayor.
“That’s something that’s maybe harder in San Francisco than in other cities because of our political culture,” Metcalf said.
Rahaim said he was up for the task. “San Francisco’s politics may be different than [Seattle’s], but it’s a matter of degree,” he said. “There’s a high level of involvement and interest and sophistication on planning issues here.”
HOMETOWN: Detroit
AGE: 52
EDUCATION:
» B.S. in architecture, University of Michigan
» M.A. in architecture, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
CAREER:
» Department of City Planning, associate director, Pittsburgh, 1984-99
» Founding executive director of the Seattle Office of Urban Design and executive director of the Design Commission, 1999-2002
» Seattle planning director, 2002-present
- Source: City of Seattle
Ken Garcia contributed to this report.



Comments from Examiner Readers
11:38 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "John Rahaim set to take over as S.F. planning director"
Report as inappropriate
10:22 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "John Rahaim set to take over as S.F. planning director"
Report as inappropriate
10:16 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "John Rahaim set to take over as S.F. planning director"
Report as inappropriate
10:10 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "John Rahaim set to take over as S.F. planning director"
Report as inappropriate
6:09 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "John Rahaim set to take over as S.F. planning director"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I see this as just more Mayor Newsom "speak." I suggest if something isn't done to step down on the current level of development in sf, after 8 years or Mayor Newsom's supposed "innovative" style of management , it will leave a san francisco barely recognizable to many and considerably less "livable."
103 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
let's tell it how it is: The Newsom campiagn, who refuses to participate in candidates forums... is using the media as their platform. If the Newsom administration plans on making all of these changes in January, 2008 ... so can the next Mayoral administration. It sounds like new leadership in City is about to happen find that winning team.
126 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader with real concerns said:
It seems to me that Newsom and his adminstration is going through an identity crisis. Why should the readership of the Examiner be totured as this unfolds.
95 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader for the laughs said:
Here is another example of the Newsom administraton left on auto pilot. Making changes in January, 2008 when the city needed leadership over 2 1/2 years ago in the planning department. Is four more years of the same really worth it?
119 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's see how this plays out... Seems we need someone who will preserve the rich culture and diversity the City has to offer, as well as economic and business diversity. I believe this is what makes our city unique and strong. We also need protections on natural landscapes (who privatized the China Basin channel on Berry St w/ only condo access?!) - poor planning! Hopefully, there will be more discussion on creating bike-friendly (eg 14th St) streets and ped-only alleys, where people can dine or shop, or just experience a gardenized alley, etc... If we're serious about alt transportation + reducing our footprint on global warming, maybe we should try harder to encourage it and practice it...
121 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree