Multimedia News

Hollywood's hottest cougars
20 photos
Mariah Carey is 10 years older than her husba...
'Twilight' Mania
20 photos
In this image released by Summit Entertainmen...
Thanksgiving recipes
20 photos
Food & Drink Examiners are sharing a cornucop...
Hugh Jackman: Sexiest Man Alive (and a few close seconds)
20 photos
In this Nov. 10, 2008, file photo, actor Hugh...
Blondes vs. Brunettes
20 photos
Beyonce is photographed in New York on Thursd...

S.F. cabbies criticize transit measure

Aug 27, 2007 3:00 AM (453 days ago) by Joshua Sabatini, The Examiner
This story ranks # 7,639 of 8,393
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Members of the United Taxicab Workers are speaking out against a ballot measure that would hand over control of cabs to the MTA.
(Examiner file photo)
Members of the United Taxicab Workers are speaking out against a ballot measure that would hand over control of cabs to the MTA.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A November ballot measure that could give the city’s transportation agency authority to regulate the taxicab industry has riled a group of cabdrivers and the maker of a 30-year- old law that cracked down on the use of cabdriver permits.

Proposition A, introduced by Board of Supervisor President Aaron Peskin, is billed as a measure to fix Muni and would sink millions into the transit system, which is overseen by the San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency.

When it was put on the ballot by the board in July, there was little discussion of a provision in the measure that would allow the supervisors to adopt an ordinance abolishing the San Francisco Taxicab Commission and hand over control of the taxi industry, including fares and driver permits, to the MTA.

Supervisor Sean Elsbernd, who supported the ballot measure, said, “We should have one entity that should be coordinating the transportation work.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

After recently learning of the provision, the United Taxicab Workers, a union representing hundreds of city cabdrivers, is speaking out against the measure. So is Mara Kopp, wife of former supervisor Quentin Kopp, who authored Proposition K, a measure voters approved in 1978 that regulated how permits to drive cabs can be used, in an effort to crack down on abuse. UTW chair Thomas George-Williams called the provision “a little Trojan horse” that was purposefully kept under the radar.

George-Williams argued that since the regulations were approved by the voters, the MTA should not have the sole power to change them. He said he worries that the MTA board of directors, who are not elected officials but appointees, would wind up catering to the interests of taxicab companies and some permit holders who have long pushed to undo the regulations. He also worries about handing over decisions to increase fares to the MTA board. Currently, proposed changes in taxi fares undergo public hearings by the Taxicab Commission and need approval by the Board of Supervisors, whose members are directly accountable to the public.

“I was the author of Prop. K. I led successfully the campaigns against the eight efforts to repeal or tweak it at the ballot box, which speaks for itself,” said Quentin Kopp, who, being a judge, is restricted from commenting on the issue. Mara Kopp has submitted a paid ballot argument against Proposition A.

Elsbernd said opponents of this provision are making “a mountain out of a molehill” and assume that the MTA would adopt changes to Proposition K. Elsbernd also dismissed concerns about having the MTA set fares. “It has never been a problem for Muni fares. Why should it be a problem for taxi fares?”

Nathan Ballard, spokesman for Mayor Gavin Newsom, said, “The mayor has long been in favor of the merger of the Taxi Commission under the MTA.”

Peskin was unavailable for comment.

jsabatini@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:17 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Tax could beef up teacher salaries, tech"

A.Goodman @ PRO said:
Mr. Garcia should respond to the sale of the 700 Font School site, which was the one public site within walking distance to the largest rental neighborhood. It was a sustainable opportunity spoiled by improper notification,& inclusion of neighborhood groups, in the decision. The recent SF Business Times notes the sale of 8 more sites for 110 million apprx. value, with possible 900 units of housing to be created, while the money is noted for tech innovatinos. What is the fore-sight? the vision for future kids & family growth in the city? The expenditures are out-weighing the proper and timely creation of new schools. Dianne Feinstein is now a "hot" school with numerous families trying to get in. The sale of a public school site is improper, the value can never be realy recouped. The sale is a short-sighted vision of the SFUSD's future. Only Eric Mar, saw the value in the schools and their location. To allow further bonds,&proposals with no direct oversight of the expenditure worries me

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:31 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "S.F. cabbies criticize transit measure"

Examiner Reader said:
So the cabbies will be getting paid like Muni Drivers? They should be rejoicing.

141 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:06 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 27, 2007 re: "S.F. cabbies criticize transit measure"

haf devil said:
as unreliable muni is to the city of san francisco and now an attempt to merge it with the taxi industry? this is way crazy. somebody is trying to force a business out of business. no way, jose.

141 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement