Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Teams of five people — including three police officers, one homeless outreach coordinator and one gardener — began rousing homeless people camped in the park around 4 a.m. Other teams cruised the Sunset and Richmond districts. They alerted campers to the services and gave some of them rides to the site.
Margot Antonetty, of The City’s Department of Public Health, said 22 people were placed in shelters and 17 people were placed in stabilization rooms, including a woman who was 8 months pregnant and had not seen a doctor. Stabilization rooms are single-occupancy spaces rented by the department and reserved for people with special conditions who cannot stay in shelters.
“At least 40 people left here today with solid solutions to get them on track,” said Phil Williams, a Project Homeless Connect volunteer. “One of those solutions will not be sleeping in Golden Gate Park again.”
The on-site park services were part of a larger $2.8 million campaign to evict the hundreds of people who have made Golden Gate Park home — a problem San Francisco has faced for years. Last fall, Newsom pledged to give the park a cleaner look, like Central Park in New York.
“In the budget process, we said we’re going to double the outreach teams, we’re going to increase the number of gardeners and custodians, we’re going to create a park patrol to address the needs of Golden Gate Park permanently,” Newsom said Wednesday. “That budget just passed.”
Some people, however, are not convinced the latest effort will improve the situation.
“It’s a nonproductive, disjointed effort. Shelter is not housing — it’s a temp Band-Aid for a bleeding, gushing wound,” said Elihu Hernandez, civil rights organizer at the San Francisco Coalition on Homelessness.
“There needs to be low-income affordable housing readily available for those who need it,” he said.
Facing renewed criticism that Golden Gate Park is a haven for homeless encampments, Mayor Gavin Newsom said The City may try shutting down the park after midnight to discourage late night visitors.
Newsom said other parks have closing times, including Tilden Park in the East Bay, parks in Paris and London, and New York’s Central Park.
“It may be a pilot, six months — let’s try it,” Newsom told reporters Wednesday. “The question is, how do you enforce it?”
Sleeping is already prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. in all San Francisco public parks, according to city law.
On Tuesday, Newsom introduced legislation to expand the hours from 8 p.m. to 8 a.m., and prohibit cooking, according to his spokesman Nathan Ballard.
Additionally, the mayor proposed modifying another section of park code, to prohibit any person from “modifying the landscape in any way in order to create shelter, accumulate household furniture, appliances, or construction debris.”
Another consideration, Newsom said, is whether or not cars would still be allowed to go through the park.
“If we allow egress and ingress to drive through, that’s an enforcement issue,” Newsom said.
The mayor said it would be unlikely that The City would close down other parks after dark.
“I think Golden Gate Park is a regional park; it’s more than just a neighborhood park,” he said. “This is the park where we have the biggest problems.” — Bonnie Eslinger
Examiner Staff Writer Bonnie Eslinger contributed to this report.
Share your comments below.
Each day until voters go to the polls Nov. 6, The Examiner lays odds on local figures beating Mayor Gavin Newsom. Check out our exclusive blog: San Francisco's Next Mayor?



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:40 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 26, 2008 re: "Dozens evicted from Golden Gate Park"
Report as inappropriate
2:47 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Dozens evicted from Golden Gate Park"
Report as inappropriate
2:41 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Dozens evicted from Golden Gate Park"
Report as inappropriate
2:19 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Dozens evicted from Golden Gate Park"
Report as inappropriate
10:41 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Dozens evicted from Golden Gate Park"
Report as inappropriate
8:21 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Dozens evicted from Golden Gate Park"
Report as inappropriate
aaron said:
Gavin Newson had substance abuse issues while being the mayor of San Francisco. It is easy to get you life back on track when you have money, and plenty of people around to support you when your down. There are people living in there cars in my neighborhood "The Richmond district" S.F. Who are working, they have jobs. They are not making enough money to pay rent. This is happening all over the country. You may be the next person to lose your job. How will you cope with standing in a line waiting for a meal. I am sure of only one thing, Gaven will never be standing in that line. Some of the greatest Americans were poor. The people I meet in my job are doing very well, and they never have anything to say about anything. They remind me of the movie, Invasion of the body snatchers. One out ten can carry a conversation of substance. Most are just standing there justifying there jobs. If you really new what was going on in city hall, it would make you sick, as it did me.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope this shines a light on the obvious problem. I agree with out Social Services Worker as well as the thoughts on the CftH. The system can only be bent so far before those it is meant to serve suffer at the hands of the lazy or degenerate.
156 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'll second the comment on the Coalition. Never been a more effective group of enablers. The coalition is a large part of the problem and need to be treated (and dismissed) as such.
162 agree | 146 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm not sure I understand your comment, Mr Franklin. It's not the function of the city of SF to offer jobs to people. We have a civil service system, so anyone can take the tests when offered. Please see the SF Dept of Human Resources website. I work in Social Services here in SF. I worked with the GA program for several years. Many of my clients were "homeless" as a result of drink, drugs, crime, illiteracy, and sloth. We had, and still have, programs to address these issues, but the clients were not interested in the most part. They were, however, interested in the $350 or so each month we gave them for doing not much of anything. No time limits, either. As a result, SF has over 10,000 single adults on GA. These people are not disabled, as GA makes all of them apply for SSI. Almost all are denied due to lack of disability. My point in the original post was that SF is one of the last remaining cities to tolerate these hordes of drifters, slackers, and transients
140 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Albert B. Franklin, Redwood City said:
Not that long ago, the homeless were offered jobs that they did not want. However, when the poor of San Francisco tried to get the work, why were they [citizens of San Francisco] denied those slots? If either the city or county can not get non citizens to fill job slots, what stops them from giving them to the poor of San Francisco City and County? When gold was discovered in California, local and state government did not have a problem finding able bodies to work in the mines, so when they offer employment, the homeless shun from a day's pay? Then, when jobs are not filled, they refuse to give them to the most poorest of the poor in San Francisco?
164 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You can always count on the Coalition on Homelessness to present the most ludicrous comments on anything to do with "the homeless". This organization, which was discovered handing out hundreds of phony "residence" letters to qualify out of town bums for General Assistance, dares to lecture city officials on "the homeless". Please note that the majority of the people evicted from the park were able-bodied and young. San Francisco taxpayers have NO obligation to provide these people with anything except directions out of town. Enough is enough! When will the voters of this town make their voices heard and shut down the insane GA program and other give-aways to bums that cost us over $200,000,000 a year. This is one reason that SF's budget is $6 BILLION dollars a year; larger than the budgets of 20 states.
137 agree | 163 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree