Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
"If this deadline is not met - and it appears unlikely that it will be - the effects on project costs could be significant," a report last week from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General said.
The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which is managing the Dulles rail project, has asked the FTA to approve an agreement that would hold off the Aug. 1 cost escalation, MWAA spokeswoman Tara Hamilton said.
Virginia Transportation Secretary Pierce Homer said delays would increase the price tag by $3 million to $6 million each month.
The FTA is weighing whether to commit $900 million to the first phase. Next month, the agency is expected to release the results of two separate reviews of the project that will determine whether the project is eligible for that money.
Homer said he still expects that cost-cutting measures and quick action on the rail project will be enough to qualify the project for crucial federal funds, despite an audit last week that said the price tag might be too high to meet federal criteria.
He said project officials are exploring design changes to trim the price tag for the initial 11.6-mile phase, which carries the rail from west Falls Church to Reston. Also crucial, Homer said, is moving the project along swiftly.
"Time is money," Homer said. "In any large public works construction project, it's delay and the inevitable inflationary costs that really hurt you in the long run."



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:48 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 5, 2008 re: "Dulles Rail contractor to keep working, at undetermined cost"
Report as inappropriate
5:34 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008
re: "Dulles Rail contractor to keep working, at undetermined cost"
Report as inappropriate
12:12 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Officials: Dulles rail costs to escalate again"
Report as inappropriate
9:37 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Officials: Dulles rail costs to escalate again"
Report as inappropriate
Lisa Green said:
Wow. I can't believe our Governor and his administration are actually getting away with this. Amazing that there hasn't been a smoking gun revealed yet. I'm waiting for the day there will be, though. I'm expecting it. Too bad I voted for him. I feel ashamed now.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe said:
As long as this only causes my taxes to go up 50 or 60% I don't care. If they go up 100% because of this ineptitude I may become concerned.
33 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
For the dulles airport customers, it is faster to drive the Dulles. It has its own lane directly to airport. The train benefits a few travelers willing to leave the car at home . It will be used mostly by Loudoun country residents try to avoid big traffic off 66 and toll road. The system won't be used efficiently and cost effectively as the DC system due to irregular utilisation pattern of majoirty of users and long distance of outdoor rails to maintain year round .
156 agree | 149 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
E.S. said:
Why are we being strong-armed by DTP and MWAA? I have a simple solution for Mr. Homer that will get the costs down without trimming/cutting out important parts of the design. It's called, "COMPETITION" If you want your costs to come down on anything, open up the estimating process to fair competition. This is the only effective way that necessary parts of the project can be retained and even enhanced, schedules can be met, and costs can be kept to a minimum. If we can shop around for the best price and value for a product on the Internet in just a few minutes, I think we can find the right company in a few months. Trimming out important parts of the design will leave us with nothing but a barebones, unsightly and unreliable system at best. Maybe it's time to review those offers made for a fixed-price tunnel?
169 agree | 166 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree