
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The U.S. Department of Transportation released a brutal audit of the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project on Friday, attacking the project's rising cost and slippery timeline and calling into question whether it can pass federal muster.
The results of the yearlong audit cast a shadow over the 23-mile, more than $5 billion rail extension as the Federal Transit Administration finishes its own two analyses of the project's first phase.
Those reports, expected in early August, will determine whether the initial 11.6-mile leg can move forward.
In December 2004, the first phase was projected to cost $1.52 billion, and finish by 2009, according to report from the DOT's Office of Inspector General.
By March 2007, that price had grown to as high as $2.7 billion with a completion date of 2013.
"In past reviews of major projects, rapid cost growth and schedule slippages so early in the project were clear signs of risk," the audit stated. "The reliability of the current [Dulles rail] cost estimate is unknown."
The FTA has yet to determine whether it will commit $900 million to the new rail line.
Dulles rail already ranks poorly on the agency's scale of cost-effectiveness, which weighs potential ridership with cost.
Passing that rating, the audit said, "may prove difficult with the current cost increases."
"This report raises important concerns regarding the Dulles Metrorail project and reinforces our decision to call for an additional, independent review of the project's costs and risks," said FTA Administrator James Simpson in a statement Friday.
The audit recommended the FTA conduct all of its reviews "with extra vigilance" and give additional scrutiny to local funding sources and contract agreements, among other recommendations.
The first phase to Wiehle Avenue in Reston is paid for by the $900 million federal funds, along with the local tax district raising $400 million, with the balance to come from Dulles Toll Road revenue.
The toll-road portion could amount to $1.4 billion or more. Funding is far less certain for the last phase, to Dulles airport.
The audit also called the competition for the project "limited," echoing prior criticisms of how the state and Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which will take over the project, reached their contract with Bechtel Infrastructure and Washington Group International.
State and MWAA officials have nevertheless expressed confidence in their project.
Matt Tucker, head of the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, said cost increases are common for megaprojects like Dulles Rail.
"I'm confident that we're going to meet the FTA cost effectiveness threshold," he said.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:18 PM MST on Fri., Nov. 16, 2007 re: "Despite risk, Dulles rail moves forward"
Report as inappropriate
9:30 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 15, 2007
re: "Dulles Metrorail project to begin despite concern with federal funds"
Report as inappropriate
7:45 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 15, 2007
re: "Dulles Metrorail project to begin despite concern with federal funds"
Report as inappropriate
6:29 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Report rips Dulles Metrorail project's rising cost"
Report as inappropriate
4:14 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 29, 2007
re: "Report calls into question Dulles Metrorail project's rising cost"
Report as inappropriate
9:18 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 28, 2007
re: "Report calls into question Dulles Metrorail project's rising cost"
Report as inappropriate
6:57 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 28, 2007
re: "Report calls into question Dulles Metrorail project's rising cost"
Report as inappropriate
Still expensive said:
BostonRay, you must go to some expensive movies. Because even after subtracting $900 million in federal funds, the first leg still costs 1,930 million dollars. There are about one million residents of Fairfax county, so this is $1,930 each - or probably around $4,500 for every wage earner. Don't forget the cost for the whole thing is around 4 billion and rising. Then it will require subsidies every year afterward. Not to mention, there is no more train capacity at the Rosslyn tunnel under the Potomac - so they will have to reduce service to Vienna or spend even more to expand/replace the tunnel. All so politically connected developers in Tysons can have skyscrapers that are "transit friendly".
153 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Leonard said:
relocating utilities on route 7, at the very least, will improve its image as it currently looks like a slum with the weeds and massive utility poles. this will enhance the experience as western drivers come eastbount on 7 past best buy and into the heart of tysons.
175 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
BostonRay said:
When you add in the Federal funding, what is the average out of pocket cost to the individual? The price of a movie ticket! Sheesh! Get over it! This line was supposed to have been constructed decades ago. It was needed then and it is sorely needed now.
148 agree | 160 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Andrew said:
For 2.7 billion dollars, we ought to just tell people to either move near an existing Metro station or go find another job if they don't like driving. It will never average 4 hours to get to work, because people will just move away before that point. Metro can barely manage the system it has now with a decent service level. Escalators fail constantly, rail work single-tracks various lines all of the time, ever look at the concrete pours in some parts of stations? crumbling away. I first blame the fools who put the airport 30 miles from the city in 1965. In ten years, flying will be extremely expensive anyway so who will need the airport? When you have to choose between fuel for the farm equipment or fuel for the jets, the food wins every time.
209 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's Loudoun county not Loundoun county. If you thinks it's bad on metro, try driving. Just because it is a benefit to airport users has nothing at all to do with it's benefits to commuters. Instead of just spewing nonsense without backing it up, I will give you an example. Vienna is considered fairly close in to DC. Can you imagine what traffic would be like without I-66 and Metro? Well could you? I didn't think so. The extension is good for everyone from the metro workers to the people going to the zoo, to the parents who want to get home from work and have some energy left for their kids. Taxes mchmaxes. Some of you would still be driving on dirt roads. Get a life and get in to the 21st century. And the poll takers say the people in the DC area are educated. Obviously not everyone huh 9:18pm.
183 agree | 173 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Loundoun county is so far away . It will take more than 1.5 hours metro ride to get into DC to work . I will benefit the airport users more than Loundoun county residents. Therefore operation cost will be a big tax burden for Virginia .
212 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bob Smith said:
Either get light rail to Dulles or go in with your neighbors and buy a Winibago and take turns sleeping. today's two hour commute each way may be four hours each way by 2017. At that point you might as well put the Winnibago in a parking spot in DC and sell the house. Don't ne a bunch of peckerheads.
187 agree | 184 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree