
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Amid a rising homicide rate and a recent spate of violence, supervisors are questioning the San Francisco Police Department’s flexibility in responding to crime hot spots.
So far this year, 54 homicides have taken place, compared with 45 at the same time last year. Since July 1, at least 15 people have been shot and six stabbed.
At the Police Commission meeting Wednesday night, police Lt. John Murphy identified an increase in drug-related violence as a trend. He pointed to a cluster of homicides in the downtown and South of Market areas, which he said are popular haunts for out-of-town drug dealers.
In 2006, the Board of Supervisors passed legislation requiring police officers to walk beats in neighborhoods citywide. Police Chief Heather Fong and Mayor Gavin Newsom opposed the bill, calling it micro-management of Police Department personnel.
In June, in response to rising gun violence, the Police Department added extra officers to patrol the Western Addition, where seven juveniles were injured by gunfire in two related incidents.
“The deployment of additional resources in those areas has been effective, based upon the numbers that we’re seeing,” Sgt. Mikail Ali, of the Gang Task Force, said at Monday’s meeting of the Board of Supervisors Public Safety Committee. “Unfortunately, the pie is only so large. In addressing those areas where we’ve had hot spots, we’ve essentially had to take resources from other areas in order to combat [violence].”
Police did not provide information on which areas of The City they are now focusing enforcement.
Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who represents the Western Addition, questioned the department’s response Wednesday.
“We don’t have any clarity if that’s [extra enforcement] happening in our part of The City or in other parts because the gun violence appears to be outpacing law enforcement’s ability to stem its tide,” Mirkarimi said.
At Monday’s meeting, Supervisor Bevan Dufty criticized the department’s resource deployment. “We’ve had shootings take place in areas, and then we don’t see personnel there,” he said.
On Wednesday, police spokesman Sgt. Neville Gittens pointed to flexible response teams such as the Gang Task Force, the staff of which was recently increased.
“It’s not unlimited, but we do have officers that we can move around according to what we see is going on,” Gittens said.
Mayor Gavin Newsom on Wednesday pointed to poverty as the underlying cause of the violence and pledged to rebuild public housing projects as a way of improving the conditions of those living in poverty.
Summer has brought a surge in violent crime in The City, with more robberies and shootings, according to police records.
An unofficial daily police crime recap shows that 15 shootings, at least one of which was fatal, have occurred since July 1. Also, 22 robberies have taken place, 17 of which involved firearms. Six stabbings occurred, at least one of which was fatal. A fight between two groups ended in a shooting near the Ferry Building, after which police arrested 23-year-old Marcus Fayette of San Francisco.
A string of shootings in the Bayview area apparently stemmed from a Fourth of July fight between two rival San Francisco gangs at the Raging Waters theme park in San Jose.
A source within the San Francisco Police Department said the fight involved the Oakdale Mob and rival Big Block and B and T gangs. The source indicated that retaliatory shootings followed, including a shooting Saturday on Oakdale Avenue, the site of an injunction against the Oakdale Mob. There was also a shooting at Third and Newhall streets Sunday, then a fatal shooting at Third Street and LaSalle Avenue on Monday, all connected with the Raging Waters incident, the source said.
Staff Writer Bonnie Eslinger contributed to this report.
Share your comments below.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:36 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 13, 2007 re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
12:53 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 13, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
11:58 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
8:40 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
6:48 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
5:04 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
3:04 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
1:59 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
1:22 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
1:15 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
11:21 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
9:58 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
9:58 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
9:54 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "SFPD’s anti-violence tactics bashed"
Report as inappropriate
9:52 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "Supes question SFPD's ability to stop violence"
Report as inappropriate
8:53 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 12, 2007
re: "SFPD’s anti-violence tactics bashed"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
A reader said "You can have all the police in the world; but, when you have injustice (let's not speak about Scooter Libby) it is difficult and IMPOSSIBLE to point the finger at anyone... Cry, scream, throw pebbles at the window ... no one will care ... this is America ... we say we care; truth is we only care about money. The violence will only increase as the difference between the haves and have nots increase. The end is this sea of inhumanity." What a sad, sick world you live in! Thankfully, virtually everyone in America and on Planet Earth rejects your sickness. I know this is impossible for you to believe, but nearly everyone DOES care and feels a moral duty to 'point the finger' at things that are obviously WRONG! The truth is that YOU don't care - and are projecting your diseased hopelessness onto the rest of the world. When people can't stand up for RIGHT versus WRONG, then we will have the hellhole of a world you so desperately want.
92 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SF Native said:
As a person "born & raised in SF" (not just lived here for a few years & proclaiming myself as local), I always laugh at SF politics. Bad education, parenting, job prospects, etc., = a person the police deal with daily. I wasn't aware that the SFPD was soley responsible for curing these social ills. But it's just easier to blame the police. As a liberal living in an "extreme left" city, I can only point to our neighboring counties: Marin, San Mateo, etc. which are liberal & tough on crime. How about this crazy idea ? Who does SFPD arrest on a daily basis. How many are repeat & repeat offenders ? How many on probation, double probation, or, get this, double secret probation ? How many actually get sentenced to jail time ? Of course, if the public were privy to this information, there would be hell to pay for the DA and judges. But it's just easier to blame the police. Supervisors Beware: District Elections have doomed this city ! Maybe time for a change....
100 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
Don't blame the cops, blame the liberal courts. Leave the cops alone and put the DA and the judges under the microscope. The police end up arresting the same gang-bangers over and over again only to see them released with a slap on the wrist and a lot of sympathy because of their underprivileged childhoods. The DA's office and the courts need to throw the book at anyone found carrying an unregistered firearm. Stop giving easy sentences, early probation, reduced sentences, or diversion programs. People who break the laws should have book thrown at them. Career criminals should be terrified of the police and the courts but instead they are contemptuous. The first time a punk snatches a purse, mugs an old lady, or steals some kid's lunch money, we need to throw them in jail and teach them some respect for the law, 'cause they sure don't respect it right now. No wonder a few years later they escalate to dealing drugs and drive by shootings.
90 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sfirishmom said:
Where to start, these kids who are committing crimes have no stable backrounds, no one to tell them the rules, no one to tell them what time to come home at night, no one who took them to the park as kids, no one to teach them right from wrong, no one whoever pushed them on a swing, no one who ever followed behind them on their bikes with training wheels, never fed the ducks, never had a butterfly kiss.....they have no soul. They can walk up to some poor guy or gal walking home and bumrush them and assault them and take what little this person might have and go away LAUGHING, I have see video. There is no regard for life, strangers mean nothing to them other than another victim. These kids do not feel the pain of others there is no remorse, and the cops are supposed to fix that how??? The issue starts long before the police even see them. How about all the bleeding hearts in this city take these kids home with them and raise them, how about the supervisors for one day be cops
102 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I would rather have the crime concentrated in bad neighborhoods than have the police push it out to the good neighborhoods. At least anyone with half a brain can avoid the Bayview, Mission, and Tenderloin.
118 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Manners! Teach our youths to be polite and crime will be reduced. Not just in the "proverty" neighborhoods but the entire City. Let's start surrending our MUNI seat to the elderly or handicap. Let's start giving turn signals would makes traffic flow better.
105 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Folks people have to care and not give the appearance of illusion management ... unequal justice, unequal health care, unequal opportunity creates desperate people who have nothing to lose. You can have all the police in the world; but, when you have injustice (let's not speak about Scooter Libby) it is difficult and IMPOSSIBLE to point the finger at anyone. The police, courts, and politicans just manage an illusion just as the president with his war on terror and war on drugs ... all doomed to eminent failure. What about policing all politicans who do not follow their mandates, treat people rudely and are unaccountable. Oh, I forgot we have two systems of JUSTICE in America ... one for the RICH and the other for JUST US! Cry, scream, throw pebbles at the window ... no one will care ... this is America ... we say we care; truth is we only care about money. The violence will only increase as the difference between the haves and have nots increase. The end is this sea of inhumanity.
125 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mirkarimi has a lot of gall to criticize the cops when he and his fellow supes do absolutely nothing, except pass stupid resolutions like that banning plastic shopping bags, to the tune of almost a hundred thousand dollars of tax payer money per year. Ross sashayed into the Lone Star Saloon recently to present a proclamation to some bear gathering. The beaming supe likewise received some commendation from self-appointed bear community leader and scary Gino Vanelli look-alike John Caldera. It was a gratuitous and sickening display). When an audience member audience shouted "Fix the Roads!" (hardly an extreme demand), Mirkarimi was visibly upset. He lamely replied that mayor was to blame for all the city's ills, stomped off the stage and angily exchanged words with the guy. Why do the supes have such eggshell egos? Why do they take every political criticism personally? Why do we tolerate their endless posturing and inaction?
107 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newsom's attribution of the high crime saturating San Francisco to poverty is specious at best. Young hooligans prey upon their communities not because they are poor but rather due to a pathological street culture that refuses personal responsibility, eschews the decidedly unglamourous grind of working 9-5 for the quick, big money that drug dealing and gang banging can bring and blithely accepts the very real possibilities of incarceration and/or death as risks inherent in living the gangsta life. This is especially true of the savage illegal immigrant gangs that plague the Mission and must be eradicated (ICE, where are you?). Apart from self-serving "activists," African-American and Chicano/Latino communities constantly demand MORE police in their neighborhoods. Give it up Gavin! Leave your bastion of privilege for a week and live in the 'hood with the people you and the loony tunes (Chris Daly is Dan White) supes ostensibly represent. You'll soon change your tune.
110 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To saturate black neighborhoods with cops would certainly be deemed an invasion by the ACLU and other "community activists". Everyone knows in their bones who and what the problems are but no one will come out and say it publicly. They talk about black victims ad nauseum but blacks are the ones putting them (and others) in the grave. A few years ago there was a program involving SFPD along with the CHP and they saturated the Bayview. From what I remember it was an unequalled success as many wanted felons were captured, stolen guns and cars recovered, and crime overall went down. Let the cops do what they need to do, quit crying racism, quit complaining about "lack of access" whatever that means, quit making excuses, and JOIN the police in ridding the streets of these vermin. It's outrageous that criminals can get away with so much in this town, thanks to an ineffective district attorney and empathetic liberal attitude to their "plight".
119 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bayview resident said:
Last Friday, in the Dolores Park area (one of the most gentrified in the city), I saw one police car per block - that is, police cars everywhere. I wish I'd see a similar deployment in the Bayview. There was a shooting right in front of my house a couple of weeks ago, and I don't see more police cars after that.
85 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A stronger community said:
The public also needs to learn how to effectively observe and report criminal activities, so that the ones committing the crimes are more likely to be arrested and jailed. Criminals will be less inclined to commit crimes if they know the community is watching. I understand that some communities are fearful of retaliation, but until a stronger front is built with those not committing the crimes, then violence will continue to occur. The public cannot rely solely on the police to fix everything.
106 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SF Cop said:
(cont). The shooters got away (in a car), the foot beat cops were unable to do anything and the victims still died or were seriously injured. Meanwhile, the calls for service start to back up because there are fewer cops to handle them (foot beat cops can only cover s small area to respond to calls). Since the cops in cars are going from call to call, there is no time for preventive patrol, which means the crooks see less police cars patrolling which gives them more time to commit their crimes and the crimes go up, not down!!!! Foot beats are only effective when you have a full squad to cover both foot beats and car sectors. Something we can't do because we are short staffed. Nobody wants to apply to SFPD because of all the negative press, politicians, OCC etc. We want to do our job! We want to help people!! But we have families to support and can not afford being in trouble for just doing our job and being charged on false allegations by OCC and punished by the commission!!
108 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SF Cop said:
What the people of SF need to know is that your officers have been forced to De-police. This is a phenomenon happening across the country. When the media, politicians and "community activists" constantly say cops are racists, abusive thugs and constantly want to second guess cops, then we get the message loud and clear. If every little thing we do will result in an investigation, and that investigation is conducted by, or demanded by cop haters like the OCC, ACLU, NAACP, and cops know they will never get a fair hearing in front of our police comission, then we can only do one thing. Do Less! The less you do, the less likely false allegations are made against you and the less likely you will be charged with those false allegations. Thanks to your supervisors and police comission, we have been taught less is more! As for foot beats, there have been several drive by shootings within one block of officers on the beat!! That means those officers could do nothing to stop it!! (cont)
138 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SF Examiner Reader said:
Although the Board of Supervisors has the right to question the SFPD's effectiveness in combating crime; however, in my opinion it seems that the Board enjoys criticizing the SFPD instead working with the SFPD in addressing the crime problem in this city. For once I'd like to read a news article where the Board is working with the SFPD to combat the crime problem in the city.
113 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SF resident said:
When will everyone wake up and realize that the ACLU runs the Police Department. This is a result of Prop H that allowed the Board of Supervisors control over who is appointed to the Police Commission.
126 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
For some reason the numbers weren't included in my post below. That should be 6.5% of the population committing 75% of the violent crime.
112 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This city will never be behind the cops to the extent necessary to combat crime, because when the media starts to report more and more "black" arrests as a result of a more focused crime crackdown, the populace will scream racism. And the leaders of this city will beckon to the will of these crybabies, demand the cops stop "hassling" blacks, the DA will refrain even more from filing charges, and the liberals will all feel good about themselves having confronted racist cops. The murders will continue unabated, other violent crimes will skyrocket and go unreported in the media. Supervisor Mirkarimi, who just can't seem to shut up, will rant on about his "distressed" district yet won't plead with his constituents to relent on murdering each other. With 6½% of the population, blacks are committing ¾ of the violent crime here. There are jobs available everywhere yet the attraction to crime is simply too great to bypass and avoid. This is a social disease that isn't going away anytime soo
116 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Fed up with the politics said:
When you have a Police Commission who spends more time trying to please the ACLU and no time discussing strategies or ideas to combat crime, then what you get is what we have now, more homicides and no solutions. The Board of Supervisors and the police Commission should alow the Police to do their jobs by giving them the tools necessary to complete the task rather then trying to find various ways to disipline, punsish and scorn them. If that is not possible, then Supervisors Daly, Ammiano, Mirkarimi, Commissioners Sparks, Vernosese, Marshall and the rest should don the uniform and do the jobs themselves. Maybe the ACLU can join in and offer some suggestions or is that too much for them
102 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader - Magnolia said:
It's NOT all for SFPD to 'fix' ... there are real problems, many of which begin w/lack of parental / adult guidance. Lack of self-esteem, lack of family or community pride. The uneducated, unloved are quicker to "strike" than to work together.
110 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree