Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

S.F. bike group seeks new lights at Fell, Masonic

Jun 27, 2007 3:00 AM (524 days ago) by Alexis Terrazas, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Sam Sapoznick, a volunteer with the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, stops oncoming cars for pedestrians and cyclists crossing the busy intersection of Masonic and Fell streets.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
Sam Sapoznick, a volunteer with the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, stops oncoming cars for pedestrians and cyclists crossing the busy intersection of Masonic and Fell streets.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - For Peter Borkon, it was his first time revisiting the intersection of Fell and Masonic streets since he was broadsided by a Chevy Suburban while riding his bike only a month ago.

Recovering from a fractured hip, a broken nose and abrasions from head to toe, Borkon is now healthy enough to ride his bike, but the scars remind him of the terror of crossing the “notorious” intersection.

“I don’t ride my bike in the city anymore,” he said.

Borkon isn’t the only victim recently struck by vehicles at the busy intersection. Four people crossing the intersection in the last two months have been hit by vehicles, said Rachel Kraai, project manager for the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Kraai said the intersection is dangerous because of the large-radius left turns vehicles make from Fell Street onto Masonic. The wide turns, along with busy traffic, make it difficult for drivers to see pedestrians and bicyclists crossing the intersection.

But members of the community have taken action to find a temporary solution to the ongoing problem. Volunteer crossing guards have been regulating the crosswalk area along the Panhandle path — mainly during commute hours, when the intersection is at its busiest.

At a news conference held at the intersection Tuesday, community members pointed out how many near misses occur there and put forth possible solutions to the problem.

One measure the SFBC and its colleagues hope to implement is to separate the crossing light into two phases — one for pedestrians and bicyclists and one for vehicles.

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who represents the district where the intersection exists, introduced a resolution to the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday urging the Municipal Transportation Agency to create the crossing-light system.

Volunteer crossing guard Sam Sapoznick said he sees one or two near-hits during noncommute hours. During commute hours, however, that number rises to between five and 10 near-hits. The crossing guard program is only a temporary solution, however, and will end this week.


Should The City do more to ensure safe crossings?

Share your comments below.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:15 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007 re: "S.F. bike group seeks new lights at Fell, Masonic"

Carol Orton said:
I rarely ride in SF anymore because the density and ferocity traffic make moving about the city so scarey. I wear my CalTrans reflective vest and helmet whenever I ride and I have flashers on during the day as well, but I've been sideswiped anyway by a driver in a rush. I hope the city puts in the crossing light for pedestrians and bicyclists and makes it long enough to get across all four lanes.

191 agree | 179 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:15 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 28, 2007 re: "S.F. bike group seeks new lights at Fell, Masonic"

Examiner Reader said:
I don't even own a bike- and secretly~ I love my car! But the fact of the matter is- we must do everything we can to protect bicyclists from idiot drivers (I've been one many times). This intersection is part of the overall Panhandle route for bicycles- and everytime I pass through it- there's a mangled bicylce and cops talking to an idiot driver (ok-not every time- but enough that its absurd). I say put in the new type of crossing light- a life is worth a little delay- and I'm more than happy to wait a bit.

198 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:48 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "S.F. bike group seeks new lights at Fell, Masonic"

Jory said:
Re: "I have seen may bicyclists drive across the pedestrian crosswalks at Fell and Masonic without looking to see if it was safe to do so. That is suicidal behavior. If the bicyclists obeyed the vehicular traffic rules of the road they would not be driving into path of moving cars" I hate to say it but you have that part wrong in this instance. Usually you are correct in saying, bikes cannot RIDE through a crosswalk, they must dismount, but in this case that crosswalk is actually the continuation of a bike lane and there is a sign specifically telling cars to yield to bikes passing through it. The intersection is unsafe, period. Cars cannot see the bikes and pedestrians, bikes and peds cannot see the cars. To make it worse, the intersection is always clogged by cars that tried to make it through before the light turned red and got stuck and thus do crazy things to get out of the intersection.

194 agree | 206 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "S.F. bike group seeks new lights at Fell, Masonic"

Examiner Reader said:
I have seen may bicyclists drive across the pedestrian crosswalks at Fell and Masonic without looking to see if it was safe to do so. That is suicidal behavior. If the bicyclists obeyed the vehicular traffic rules of the road they would not be driving into path of moving cars. If the bicyclists walked their bike across in the crosswalks as pedestrians they would not put themselves in so much danger. Self preservation should be a trigger higher instinct than selfabsorbtion. The "city" is us and we collectivly cannot protect anyone from self destrctive behvior.

194 agree | 215 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:14 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "S.F. bike group seeks new lights at Fell, Masonic"

Seven said:
The city must ensure our safety. It's a basic fundamental expectation of any taxpaying citizen.

206 agree | 201 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement