Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Peskin promises ‘no-drama budget’ process

Jun 26, 2007 3:00 AM (525 days ago) by Joshua Sabatini, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
The dramatic public budget feud between Mayor Gavin Newsom, left, and Supervisor Chris Daly escalated to epic proportions when Daly alleged that the mayor used cocaine and Newsom called the accusation 'the cheapest of cheap shots.' Board president Aaron Peskin fired Daly from the budget committee and is now promising that the process will continue without any further drama.
(Examiner file photos)
The dramatic public budget feud between Mayor Gavin Newsom, left, and Supervisor Chris Daly escalated to epic proportions when Daly alleged that the mayor used cocaine and Newsom called the accusation "the cheapest of cheap shots." Board president Aaron Peskin fired Daly from the budget committee and is now promising that the process will continue without any further drama.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - In the aftermath of a political firestorm around Mayor Gavin Newsom’s proposed city budget, the president of the Board of Supervisors attempted on Monday to keep the flames extinguished.

“Welcome to day one of the no-drama budget,” Supervisor Aaron Peskin said as he kicked off the board’s Budget and Finance Committee hearing Monday — the first day members of the committee began taking action on Newsom’s proposed $6.1 billion budget for the fiscal year beginning Sunday.

Peskin was apparently attempting to send the message that the lively public feud Supervisor Chris Daly sparked with Newsom over the priorities reflected in Newsom’s budget — Daly wanted more money for housing programs and less for street repairs and police staffing — were no longer taking center stage.

Daly’s frustration seemingly increased last week, during a Board of Supervisors hearing on proposed cuts to health services, when he said Newsom hypocritically proposed funding cuts to substance abuse programs while Newsom “artfully dodges every question about allegations in his own cocaine use.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

Daly’s comments had the Mayor’s Office calling for Daly’s censure. Newsom responded by denying he used cocaine, while blasting Daly for employing “sleazy” politics.

A week before Daly’s drug comment, Peskin had removed Daly from the board’s Budget and Finance Committee, on which Daly served as chairman, in an effort to quiet the storm and make the budget process about policy, “not about personality or electoral politics.”

With little debate, the budget committee on Monday signed off on the proposed budgets of a number of city departments, including the Mayor’s Office, City Attorney’s Office, Recreation and Park, Assessor-Recorder and Elections.

The committee’s actions also included placing the $5 million that would help fund Newsom’s plan to rebuild The City’s troubled public housing sites on reserve until further hearings are held. The committee also allocated about $400,000 to the Public Library to increase library hours.

Code of conduct plan spelled out

A supervisor is expected to introduce a code of conduct for the Board of Supervisors today, following controversial comments by one member.

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier has said that a code of conduct is necessary given Supervisor Chris Daly’s comments last week, when he suggested that Mayor Gavin Newsom used cocaine. Newsom angrily denied the charge.

A draft of Alioto-Pier’s proposal states that members of the Board of Supervisors “shall make no allegations against other supervisors, other elected and appointed officials or staff which are improper, false or misleading or slanderous,” among other rules.

Alioto-Pier’s proposal would allow the Board of Supervisors to remove a supervisor for misconduct from any adjunct committee representing The City and from any board committee with fiduciary responsibilities for one year.

Any member would be able to submit a motion alleging a violation of the code of conduct, which would result in a hearing before the full board. A censure, which would carry the penalties under the proposal, would require a two-thirds vote by the board. Lesser punishments are also included in the proposal.

jsabatini@examiner.com


Will the Board of Supervisors approve the budget?

Share your comments below.

Each day until voters go to the polls Nov. 6, The Examiner lays odds on local figures beating Mayor Gavin Newsom. Check out our exclusive blog: San Francisco's Next Mayor?

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

3:57 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Peskin promises ‘no-drama budget’ process"

Native San Franciscan said:
Chris Daly is a complete hypocrite. He came to San Francisco a few years ago to rail against gentrification in the Mission District and now owns a condo in that same neighborhood. Its obvious to anybody whose has observed his comments over the past six years that Chris Daly is a hater - a man who along with his so-called “progressive’ allies will smear or destroy anybody to ram their ideological agenda down every throats. They are a cancerous malignancy on the body politic of San Francisco. The sooner the voters in San Francisco wake up and realize this, the sooner San Francisco will see an improvment in its quality of life, both inside and outside City Hall.

229 agree | 221 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:42 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
Well Chris Daly should have asked the mayor to deny his cocaine use under oath and comply to be deposed on the $20 million law suit against him for defaming and violating the Bill of Rights of Police officers on the video gate.

189 agree | 174 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:28 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
A Note to Supervisor Daly: If you think the Mayor is doing such a terrible job, why don't you step up to the plate and run against him? You had previously claimed that you could beat him. You had also said you would run if there was no other Progressive candidate. Or truth be told that your city wide approval ratings are so low, that the outcome would be a complete disaster?

211 agree | 167 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:55 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Knot2brite said:
I would ask Sup. Chris Daly, who cuts your hair? Because, to me, it looks like whoever it was, was in a real hurry. Newsome, the Mayor, has neat looking hair AND he wears a tie, but Daly with that haircut that looks like he used a pair of clippers from Wallgreens that cost like ten bucks or something, he looks goofy, plus he doesn't shave, or else he's trying to grow a beard. No, to me this is really about hairstyles, not lifestyles.

188 agree | 170 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:49 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
When the city budget process becomes a game of those that have and those that do not have anything. I would like to have Chris Daly in my corner.

190 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:22 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
I support the ideas Daly stands for, but I think he lacks tact as a government official. It's a shame because I believe his ideas will ultimately lead this city in the right direction. However, it seems as if he simply prefers to sling mud at his colleagues instead of taking steps to turn his ideas into action. To get the job done, we need a real diplomat with the same ideas. It's the diplomacy part that will prevent Chris from getting anywhere in this town, not his stance on issues. And let's face it... the greatest leaders this City has seen in the past 50 years have been true diplomats. Enough name calling, Chris. Get to work. We already have one absentee supervisor on the board (albeit not much longer).

200 agree | 193 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:50 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
Chris Daly is a complete IDIOT. He needs to be removed from his elected office and replaced immediately. Everyone should read the opinion of the people on Yelp.com. Get him out of office!!!!

192 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:44 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Jerry Jarvis said:
Yeah Chris Daly!

175 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:35 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

SF Richmond Gay Dem said:
Artlcle is wrong: Daly is no longer Chair of that committee. BOS President Peskin removed him!

206 agree | 215 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:24 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

Richmond Resident said:
Both Newsom and Daly are right. They are both low-lifes, and neither has contributed positivly to the City. Daly advocates for more public housing. He wishes to condemn more people to live in squalid housing perpetrated by the Housing Department? The City itself is the City's biggest and most abusive slumlord. Daly hasn't got a clue as to how to improve public housing. Throwing money at a problem without a plan won't improve the situation, and may make the problem bigger, but it will fill the pockets of Daly's political cronies. Daly doesn't have a plan, other than to make Newsom look bad whenever possible. Newsom on the other hand is a window-dressing politician, who is willing to pander to any group he feels will help him in his next election (Gay Marriages, Saturday park closures, Heather Fong appointment, 6.25% per year pay increase for Cops while nurses get less than 5%, even though they already make less).

205 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:21 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

SF Richmond Gay Dem said:
Daly has nothing to lose...term-limited and too cowardly to actually run again the Mayor so more fun to smear him personally. Pathetic fool!

228 agree | 189 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:16 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
Daly has finally gone off the rails!

228 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:06 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader enlighten said:
Again, here are Examiner reporters focusing on two political individuals. The real story was all those who felt the need to testify about how budgets cuts will impact members of the commuity and actually cost tax payers more. And hearing that the members of the Board of Supervisors all felt that the Mayor should attend that hearing out of respect.

229 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:56 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
I think Chris Daly realizes that his scheme to destroy Newsom politically has backfired so he is going to attack him personally. He didn't get his way the first time so he is acting out, like a child basically.

234 agree | 199 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:49 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
Progressives are almost as bad as the Republican these days. The comment below is a perfect example how Daly would use a malicious unfounded rumor to destroy someones reputation. What's next a illegitamite black baby like Senator McCain? Daly needs to grow up and stop acting like a 5th grade bully. If he can't act like a responsible adult maybe he should just do us all a favor and resign.

201 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:45 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Board calls Daly attack on Newsom 'sleazy politics'"

Examiner Reader said:
Daly has the city best interest at hand unlike Newsome who nothing but a cocaine addict adn alcoholic and that is why he slept with his campaign managers wife, stole money adn allows city govmt. to practice in discrimination favortism and everything else SF would be better off without Newsome, Daly speaks the truth SF voters and easily tricked or manipulated

219 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:46 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Daly' blasts Newsom, angers board of supes"

Montira said:
So is Daly the one who initially started the rumor that Newsom uses cocaine? That yahoo (Daly) reaches new lows each day.

248 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:51 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 re: "Daly accuses Newsom of illegal use of funds"

Daly Annoyance said:
Chris Daly is a perfect example of why District Elections are a farce in SF. The vast majority of tax paying residents care about buses, roads, police protection, and other issues that effect their lives, not redistributing their tax dollars away from these issues, to Daly's special interests. If anyone should be recalled its DALY.

210 agree | 225 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:55 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 re: "Newsom takes the budget battle to public"

Examiner Reader elighten said:
"$700,000 to jumpstart a new court program in the Tenderloin for low-level offenses including aggressive panhandling"...It will take alot more money to establish these courts, matching funds from the federal government and of course the court sytem. Again the writers of the Examiner seem not to do any investigative work or the would find that these proposed courts jurisdiction is broader the just the North of Market area "Tenderloin" and would focus on issues largely ignore by the current administration for the last four years.

262 agree | 224 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:23 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Daly accuses Newsom of illegal use of funds"

Above Average said:
Support Daly or Newsome? Is that THE question? a.) No, I don't. b.) If Daly is accusiong the Mayor of misusiong public funds for his (the (mayor's) political campaign then he (Daly) should PROVE it, same for all the BS RE: ED JEW!

220 agree | 207 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:58 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Daly accuses Newsom of illegal use of funds"

Examiner Reader said:
Chris Daly was elected with barely 3% of the city’s vote. He is completely out of step with the average SF voter. Most people in SF do not like Supes who ignore the constitution to let private property be seized (see rent control, TIC regulations etc) Average SF residents do not believe in absolute hostility to religion in the public square. Average SF residents do not believe in racial preferences, overly intrusive regulatory powers at home or the office or 90% of the things Daly stands for. Like the right to drink, drug, urinate in the streets, parks.

260 agree | 231 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:46 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Daly accuses Newsom of illegal use of funds"

Examiner Reader said:
Chris Daly has become more than an embarassment to himself. The city fails to take care of basic taxpayer needs. Daly's policy concerns primarily involve re-distribution of dollars from one tax-payer to another in the form of homeless support, affordable housing etc. This is well and good if local government meets its obligations to taxpayers first. And San Francisco with a budget bigger than that of 22 states, fails woefully.

237 agree | 255 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:44 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Daly accuses Newsom of illegal use of funds"

Examiner Reader said:
They also have jobs!

225 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:14 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Daly accuses Newsom of illegal use of funds"

Examiner Reader said:
I want to see Newsom and Daly in an animal cage, duke it out till the victor emerges.

236 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:28 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

Maggie Carmody said:
I don't think we'll see too many of Newsom's supporters at the rally today. They're too busy looking up their stocks and driving around in their Mercedes.

223 agree | 279 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:26 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Budget battle far from over"

Examiner Reader said:
In support of the Mayor's budget. Opposed to Supervisor Daly's amendments.

233 agree | 251 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:06 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 12, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

Jack said:
Any random shootings in SOMA this week? Murders at Donut World on 6th and Market? 80-something year old women run over on 19th Avenue by excessively fast drivers? Chris Daly may have good intentions, but he is completely out of touch with reality - just like that retard of a President in the White House right now. If people are afraid to step out of their homes for fear of being shot or run over by a car, what good is affordable housing? We have a public safety problem that is growing more and more each day these "progressive" weinies refuse to acknowledge it. Maybe San Franciscans should be given the right to carry a concealed gun if Supervisor Daly, Ammiano, and the others do not have the guts to hire enough police to protect San Franciscans and tourists from the murderers and thieves entering our City from the east bay and peninsulas.

275 agree | 240 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 12, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

Gretchen said:
Daly can't see the big picture -ever. If we don't fix the city's infrastructure - e.g. potholes, there won't be a city that needs housing. Also, since other efforts have reduced the number of homeless in SF, the budget should be reduced too. The new Community Justice Center will not only serve the homeless but will reduce quality of life crimes and free up police and court resources. By the way - given that the budget is $6.1 billion, the per capita cost for every man, woman and child in SF will be $8,133. to support the 2008 city budget: ($6,100,000,000/750000=$8133). Tell Daly we should save money by reducing the number of special interest line items that already exist - not add more for him to play politics. Better yet, reduce the number of supervisors - a city the size of SF needs only half as many supes as we have currently.

275 agree | 245 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:47 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 12, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

Montira said:
The voting function on this site doesn't seem to work right now. . .kind of like the voting functions of a certain city. Anyway, I agree with P. Fitzgerald on all counts, including the observation that "politics in Hawaii were bizarre". I was born/raised there, so I know that, too.

260 agree | 225 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:13 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 12, 2007 re: "Budget 'smackdown' on City Hall steps today"

P. Fitzgerald said:
I plan on attending this rally to rally AGAINST Daly! Garcia's article in The Examiner this morning was amusing and voices my sentiments about Chris Daly perfectly. This group of Supervisors is really a mess. As a former resident of Honolulu, I thought the politics in Hawaii were bizarre but this bunch takes the cake. They all appear to have hidden agendas and evil twins!

264 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement