California News

Multimedia News

Elections 2008: On the trail
20 photos
Demonstrators protest against Republican pres...
Future gadgets now
20 photos
A model demonstrates Nikon Media Port 'UP300'...
Hoops here it comes
20 photos
Detroit Shock forward Katie Smith, front, col...
Madonna starting to show her age
20 photos
Madonna performs in concert during her 'Stick...
Pool fashion gets weird
20 photos
Models wear creations by French fashion desig...

Dulles Toll Road ruling is appealed

Jun 11, 2007 10:49 AM (484 days ago) by William C. Flook, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: Richmond
Two Fairfax County residents have filed suit to stop the Kaine administration from turning over the state roadway to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which would use likely billions in toll revenue to help fund a new Metrorail line to Dulles Airport (shown in an artists rendition above).
(File photo)
Two Fairfax County residents have filed suit to stop the Kaine administration from turning over the state roadway to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which would use likely billions in toll revenue to help fund a new Metrorail line to Dulles Airport (shown in an artists rendition above).

Richmond (Map, News) - Two Northern Virginia men asking the courts to block the transfer of the Dulles Toll Road filed an appeal Friday with the state Supreme Court after a Richmond judge tossed out their lawsuit in March.

Patrick Gray and James Nagle, both of Fairfax County, have filed suit to stop the Kaine administration from turning over the state roadway to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, which would use likely billions in toll revenue to help fund a new Metrorail line to Dulles Airport.

If the suit were successful, it would prevent, or at least complicate, the use of the funds for the 23-mile rail extension. Gray and Nagle asserted the move was unconstitutional, because the governor lacked the authority to sign off on the transfer without permission from the General Assembly.

The commonwealth, however, successfully argued that the two could not legally sue the state, citing the doctrine of “sovereign immunity,” which protects agencies from lawsuits. Richmond Circuit Court Judge Margaret Spencer dismissed the case before it went to trial.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“Suits, such as this, challenging the constitutionality of actions of executive branch officers and agencies unquestionably interfere with the operations of state government,” the appeal states. “This fact, however, does not warrant an extension of the doctrine of sovereign immunity to constitutional challenges.”

The appeal argues that legal tests of the administration are “essential in order to implement the constitutional scheme of limited government that the people have ratified.”

The lawsuit represents a snag in a mammoth transit project that officials say is on the verge of moving forward after years of planning. Utility relocation in the path of the new track is expected to begin later this year. If the airports authority successfully assumes control of the toll road, it forecasts it will need to raise $2.88 billion in tolls for a project slated to cost $5.14 billion. MWAA also expects to more than double tolls by 2016 to help raise the revenue.

Most recent timetables estimate the entire two-phase project would be completed by 2015.

wflook@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

8:40 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 8, 2007 re: "Dulles Toll Road may see even more fare hikes in the near future"

Examiner Reader said:
It'd be nice if the Examiner was more accurate in its headlines. These fare hikes are for the private Dulles Greenway. The title would imply that it was the VDoT/MWAA operated Dulles Toll Road was the road subject to these particular toll increases. Interestingly enough, the Examiner is a vocal opponent of rail to Dulles, of which partial funding is to come from tolls on the VDoT/MWAA road. I wonder if the Examiner is deliberately confusing the two in hopes of turning public opinion against rail.

146 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement