Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal

May 30, 2007 3:00 AM (502 days ago) by Alexandria Rocha, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
If transit union approves deal, Muni managers will get incentives for increased attendance.
(Examiner file photo)
If transit union approves deal, Muni managers will get incentives for increased attendance.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Hundreds of Muni supervisors and midlevel managers will receive annual cash incentives for regular job attendance under a proposed contract with the employees’ union and the agency.

The financial incentives are meant to reward managers and supervisors who already have acceptable attendance records — and to encourage others to follow suit, officials said.

The workers, represented by Transport Workers Union Local 200, would receive a $350 annual bonus if they work at least 1,880 hours a year, or about 36 hours a week in a 52-week year. About one-third of the 270 employees would currently qualify for the payment, officials said.

Absenteeism among midlevel managers and supervisors is not a huge problem, said human resources director Diana Buchbinder, “but there still is an issue.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

The incentive program on the table is part of a proposed 74-page contract between the Municipal Transportation Agency and the union that would start July 1 and run through June 30, 2009.

In addition to the attendance program, the contract includes 11 paid holidays, five additional floating holidays and accrued vacation time that starts at two weeks for a first-year employee. Employees who use only 40 hours of sick leave during one year can turn floating holidays into cash.

The union has not approved the contract, which includes a 2 percent salary increase in April 2008 and a 3.75 percent salary increase in April 2009. Union president Glenda Lavigne said the union asked for 8 percent over the two-year period.

After the rocky opening of the T-Third metro line in early April, Muni officials have been open about attempts to solve employee-related problems within the agency.

There are about 240 vehicle operators out on long-term leave. Another 16.5 percent of drivers are absent each weekday. A Board of Supervisors Budget Analyst report from the mid-1990s showed an average of 8.6 percent unscheduled absences among street supervisors and central control dispatchers during four randomly selected pay periods.

Muni human-resource officials have estimated that one-third of the 270 employees would qualify for the financial incentive the first year, costing Muni about $60,000. Under the terms of the contract, there must be a 5 percent increase in the number of eligible employees for the program to continue.

While the union has filed an unfair labor practices lawsuit against Muni with regards to the contract, the board of directors is expected to vote on the contract in late June.

Contract offer

» 2%: Salary increase to be applied in April 2008.

» 3.75%: Salary increase to be applied in April 2009.

» 7%: Salary increase union asked for over two years.

» 350: Bonus in dollars an employee will receive each year for regular job attendance.

» 1,880: Hours an employee has to work each year to receive the attendance bonus.

» 11: Number of holidays an employee will have off each year.

» 5: Number of additional floating days employees can take off each year.

» 20: Number of job-related training hours employees are offered per year.

- Source: Municipal Transportation Agency

arocha@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:12 AM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
Just business as usual for one of the most bloated, lazy unions in America. This just demonstrates why our city government is so reluctant to fund muni. It also shows why politicians are so reluctant to make promises regarding muni - they know that for muni to run right it will require accountability and a hard-working, honest union... and the chances of that happening are about as good as Lou Dobbs being elected mayor... and like to see both those things happen! But I'm not holding my breath (except when I'm riding the 19).

102 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:25 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
And people wonder why MUNI is a mess....Paying cash bonus for people to come to work as they are supposed to? Unbelievable....

106 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:53 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
The whole muni system is broken and should be complete revamped. However, no one has the politcal will power to make any serious changes. I would recommend anyone who wants a good paying job without actually working to apply at muni. You are bound to fit right in.

110 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:43 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, this is so bogus. These guys are paid enough as it is. Use any extra money to hire and train qualified supervisors and operators that want to come to work every day.

103 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:37 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Disgusted with Muni said:
And so the next time they come crying to the tax payer to bail them out, we're supposed to? I don't get a "bonus" just for showing up on time, and I'm in the corporate world. I get a bonus for working 20 hours more a week. That's when bonuses need to be handed out.

108 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:02 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Anonymous Muni rider said:
So, Muni employees who come to work regularly, as their job descriptions already require, will be paid $350 for simply doing what they are supposed to be doing? In what weird way does this make any sense, at all? I think the Muni union needs to take its head out of the sand and realize that the days when being a union member means coasting into work when a worker feels like it are over. No wonder so many Muni employees have such an unhelpful, cavalier attitude toward the riders; their union supports and enables inappropriate behavior that is literally not tolerated anywhere else in the business world and in the real world of customer service.

107 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader & Muni Rider/Victim said:
Can't we hire the BART director to run MUNI? Clean BART trains actually arrive reliabily on time - what a concept! You could die - literally! - waiting for a "scheduled" MUNI run.

111 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:27 AM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader - SF_fan said:
OMG, how ridiculous, city and muni is short on funds (54 million) and they do this? what happened to accountability and all that? discipline slackers and give their jobs to folks who want to do it. AND this is for the smaller union... just wait until everyone else jumps on board....

106 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:49 AM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Bonuses part of Muni's contract proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
One does not reward employees for regular attendance. Instead, one disciplines those who do not attend. It's about time City employees worked in the real world.

122 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement