National Cathedral to offer tours of underground garage
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Washington National Cathedral officials will give a tour this week of its new underground bus and car garage — the first of its kind in D.C.

The tour, to take place from 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. Thursday, will allow participants to talk with Cathedral representatives, tourism officials and bus drivers about the garage’s effect on roadways, surrounding neighborhoods, tourism and worship services, according to a news release.

Construction for the $34 million underground bus garage project began in summer 2005.

About 180,000 Cathedral visitors per year arrive by bus, according to officials.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:12 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
What are the Burlingame citizens complaining about? Parking lot on Park ave. $1.00 for 10 hours...come to SF.......

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:30 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Carl said:
Come to San Francisco. Most of the meters have a time limit displayed behind scratched plastic you can't read. Guaranteed city govt here wont fix it. Not a major problem to spend city dollars on...unless of course you can't read the time limit display and get a ticket. Oh well. They don't care so why should I. I NEVER shop in San Francisco. Parking Parking Parking. I do ALL my shopping out of San Francisco. I shop at Kmart and eat at Apple Bees in Redwood City every weekend. Try it. You'll like it. Friendlier workers, no parking issues, better prices, no crowd rush, and yes the wonderful smart parking meters. Gotta love it. "Anywhere But San Francisco"

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:57 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
I love your writing style.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:55 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
GREAT JOB KEEP up the awesome work

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:32 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "More solar-powered parking meters coming to Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
On two separate occassions the meters did not work. The first time it took my money and did not deliver a receipt. The second time it took some of my money, spit out some and did not register some, but kept it. On the first occassion the authority said they would refund my money, but it has been over a month and I have received nothing. I'm waiting for a response to the second incident but not holding my breath

250 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:20 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
"This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects." WRONG--this measure will reduce the cost of apartments by $50,000-$80,000. That's a big chunk of change, especially for the poor, and above all for those who can't afford cars in the first place. Why should the government FORCE you to buy a parking space when you don't want one? All this rule is give you FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

181 agree | 195 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:15 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
Right on Tom, poor people don't drive so why not take away their parking. You progressives give me the creeps. The minimum is ONE parking space for every FOUR units of housing and you want to take that away. Tom, you and Peskin need to Get A LIFE! I bet that Mr. Peskin has at least 2 parking spaces in his million dollar condo in Nothe Beach. Leave us alone!!!

195 agree | 201 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects. It makes a hard life still harder. Sad.

186 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
I have been in Baltimore for the last 5 years. I have a disability, because of which my lower limbs are paralyzed. Recently, I have found a spurt in disability tags for parking in the last couple of years. I surveyed 7 vehicles on Redwood street, and found five had disabled tag!!! I have found that some young people in early 20s park their vehicle and walk 5 blocks without any trouble, and I on a wheelchair is unable to get a parking place. Sometimes it has been frustrating. The cops cannot do anything, as long as these disability tags certified indiscriminately by family physicians. Unfortunately, carrying a "illegal" disabled tags no longer is a social stigma. It has become as acceptable as illegal license. I hope, this letter brings some sense of morality and social responsibility to those people using disabled tags. They should understand the hardship they are causing to the disabled community. Regards, Jeremy

342 agree | 362 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

kilteddude said:
Does this mean they will stop ticketing legally parked cars? I've got 2 tickets in the last year while parked legally.

349 agree | 331 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
DAMN IT!

359 agree | 346 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "New ticket device puts illegal parkers on camera"

Ticket Amnesty said:
Ticket fines in Baltimore are absurd....so, don't pay them. Request and officer when you go to court for your ticket+fines and if he/she doesn't show (they rarely, if ever will) you only have to pay the fine + court costs....goodbye $800 fine on $21 ticket.

641 agree | 369 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)