White House slaps Snow support on wrist
White House Press Secretary Tony Snow always sports one of those yellow “Live Strong” bracelets made famous by Lance Armstrong and his defeat of cancer (Snow himself was diagnosed with cancer for the first time in 2005).
So when Snow discovered in March that his cancer had returned and spread to his liver, his colleagues at the White House wanted to do something special to boost Snow’s spirits while he underwent surgery to remove a growth in his abdomen.
One staffer in the White House press office designed yellow bracelets similar to the “Live Strong” ones, but had “Tony Snow” engraved on them instead. One thousand were made and delivered to the White House last week. So popular were the bracelets that they were soon snatched up by other White House staffers and another order of 500 was made (even President Bush has become aware of the bracelets). Staffers sporting the “Tony Snow” bracelets took a group picture of themselves with the bracelets and sent a signed copy to Snow.
“Tony was extremely touched by this and by everyone’s thoughtfulness to make these specifically for him,” White House spokeswoman Emily Lawrimore said. “He’s very grateful for his co-workers.”
“It was a total surprise,” Snow told Yeas & Nays. “The response has been really unbelievable.” He added he was going to take some of the bracelets home to his wife and kids.
But we had to ask: Will he replace his “Live Strong” bracelet with the “Tony Snow” one? “I don’t know,” he said with a laugh. “I’ll have to figure that out.”
Vanity Fair roasts Giuliani
If Rudy Giuliani wants to become president of the United States, he’s not going to get any help from Vanity Fair.
In the forthcoming issue of the magazine (on newsstands nationally May 8), Michael Wolff pens a piece on Giuliani titled, “Crazy for Rudy,” which includes such flattering descriptions of “America’s Mayor” as:
» “... a do-anything compulsion always to be at the center of attention.”
» “... he is nuts, actually mad.”
» “... his periods of mania ...”
» “... his history of interminable, bitter, asinine hissy fits ...”
» “... Rudy’s wild swings of temperament, judgment, and sense of proportion.”
» “... his need for virtually round-the-clock media attention and affirmation ...”
» “Rudy’s manic domination of the city’s airwaves and consciousness ...”
» “... an entirely inappropriate character ...”
» “... the sheer preposterousness, the zaniness and lunacy, of the notion of Rudy as president ...”
» “... the neurosis and eccentricity and ludicrousness and hubris of Rudy as supreme ruler.”
» “... he’s got no sense of caution.”
» “... Rudy’s fearlessness or kookiness ...”
How to booze your way to bipartisanship
How can we get our partisan politicians to all get along? It’s no small task, but some suggestions were offered at a conference Monday in the Hart Senate Office Building titled “Civility and American Politics.”
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn.: “Maybe what we need to do is go out for drinks more.”
But don’t get your hopes up, said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio: “The idea of going across the aisle and hugging your opponent is risky stuff.”
Oh well. ... Back to bickering.
Accused madam now freed from bugs
Whatever else her troubles, alleged D.C. madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey will no longer be tethered to an electronic monitoring device.
At Monday’s hearing in Federal District Court, Judge Gladys Kessler ruled that Palfrey would no longer have to wear an electronic device to determine her whereabouts.
In opposing the decision, an attorney for the prosecution cited Palfrey’s “history of flight,” including an instance when she left the country.
But Kessler cited Palfrey’s “record of compliance in this case” as well as the recommendations of court personnel in California, where Palfrey resides and is being monitored. Henceforth, Palfrey will have to place three phone calls per week to pre-trial services officers in California.
Palfrey, whom the court considers indigent now that federal officers have confiscated her assets, was paying $3.26 per day for the monitoring.
Kessler also ruled that due to “irreconcilable differences” between Palfrey and her publicly appointed attorney, A.J. Kramer, she would appoint new counsel for the alleged madam.
Kessler denied Palfrey’s request for $150,000 to pay for the services of New York defense attorney Herald Price Fahringer. She also denied an attempt by Palfrey’s civil attorney, Montgomery Blair Sibley, to horn in on the proceedings, ordering him away from the witness desk as he was “not listed as counsel” nor “representing her” in the criminal case.
The GOP’s fry guys
Turns out Willie Nelson, who runs his tour bus on biodiesel fuel, has some Republican friends after all. Rep. Vito Fossella, R-N.Y., announced he is co-sponsoring legislation that would double the tax credit for making fuel from used restaurant grease.
“From cooking fried calamari to powering trucks, restaurant grease represents a viable energy source for our nation,” Fossella said.
The bill is sponsored by another Republican, Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas.
Media mix
Dan Glickman is the president and chief executive officer of the Motion Picture Association of America. Today, the MPAA celebrates the life of his predecessor, the legendary Jack Valenti, at a memorial service at the Cathedral of St. Matthew. Glickman recently let us know what’s on his Media Mix.
Q: What CD are you listening to now?
Willie Nelson
Q: What was the last movie you saw?
“The Lives of Others”
Q: What Web sites do you visit in the morning?
Drudge Report, Variety, Hollywood Reporter, The Wichita Eagle
Q: What book are you reading?
“The Mighty and the Almighty,” by Madeleine Albright
Q: What’s your favorite TV show?
“Entourage” and anything on the Discovery channel



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate