Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’
Article History
There are updates to this article.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Muni is plagued by major institutional troubles, many of which led to the faulty opening of the T-Third metro line, transit officials admitted Tuesday.

A laundry list of problems is keeping Muni from being on time, reliable and fully staffed, Municipal Transportation Agency Executive Director Nathaniel Ford said. The issues haunting the oft-criticized system — which carries 700,000 weekday riders on 1,000 buses, streetcars and trolleys — include overcrowded maintenance facilities, outdated equipment and a severe shortage of drivers, mechanics and vehicles, Ford said.

Muni has been under increased scrutiny since the $648 million T-Third line began weekday operation April 9. The launch of the line caused systemwide delays and left riders stranded for up to 50 minutes. Commuters who use the N-Judah, J-Church and K-Ingleside metro lines were late to work and class because of the T-Third debut, which also changed three bus routes and eliminated the 15-Third bus route altogether.

Only 11 percent of the T-Third trains were on time the first day, MTA Chief Operating Officer Ken McDonald said.

“We won’t reach the 85 percent on-time target if we don’t address institutional infrastructure issues and operator availability,” Ford said. In 1999, San Francisco voters approved Proposition E, which set performance standards and targets for Muni. The measure requires 85 percent of Muni’s vehicles to be on time.

Most of the problems affecting the T-Third, however, were not new, Ford said, adding that driver and vehicle shortages overwhelmed the system at the T-Third’s launch.

Muni is facing a shortage of 150 drivers — positions left open because of budget constraints and a hiring freeze. There are, however, 240 drivers also out on long-term leave and a large number of other absent drivers each weekday, officials said. According to the MTA, 16.5 percent of drivers are absent each weekday.

The lack of drivers is causing the light-rail system — which includes the J-Church, K-Ingleside, L-Taraval, M-Oceanview, N-Judah and T-Third lines — to miss 3.5 percent of peak-time runs. Buses and trolleys are missing 3 percent of peak-time runs, officials said.

An operations and human resources task force has been convened to make sure drivers are returning to work when they should, officials said.

Besides drivers, the light-rail system is also down vehicles, as some cars have been kept out of service awaiting parts and others have been damaged. While dozens of mechanics have been hired in the last year, there still are not enough to service the vehicles.

With the addition of the T-Third, Muni’s radio and train-control systems are operating outside capacity. Ford said there is too much radio traffic for one channel to bear, and the train-control system is monitoring three more trains an hour than it should be.

Muni’s service problems come at a time when the agency is functioning with a $150 million structural deficit. The agency, which last month approved a $680 million budget for 2007-08, will continue to face the deficit if it doesn’t improve service and increase ridership.

Officials rush to mend T-Third issues

Although the T-Third metro line wreaked havoc on Muni’s light-rail system the past two weeks, officials have implemented a number of measures to help the new service find its niche.

The T-Third, which runs from Castro and Market streets to Bayshore Boulevard and Sunnydale Avenue, began carrying weekday commuters April 9. The line had been operating on a weekends-only schedule since January.

The line introduced an additional nine trains into the system, causing major backups at the Fourth and King streets station, which services ballgames and Caltrain commuters; at Church Street and Duboce Avenue, where trains enter the Market Street tunnel; and at Embarcadero Station where inbound trains turn around to head outbound.

With riders stranded and waiting up to 50 minutes the first few days of the line, Muni officials quickly sent senior managers to hot spots to time trains and troubleshoot problems.

Muni also assigned staff to provide customer service at the stations. MTA Executive Director Nathaniel Ford rode the light-rail vehicles the first week to talk with commuters.

Ford said Tuesday he didn’t have current travel times for T-Third trains; however, the vehicles are now spending less time in the Market Street tunnel than the first week, according to a report.

“We’re running the system each day. It’s going to be fine in a couple of weeks,” Ford said.

arocha@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:53 PM MST on Sun., May. 27, 2007 re: "Commuters sound off about Muni changes"

Anonymous said:
This is going to start hurting business sooner or later. I am Director of Facilities for a well-established 300+ headcount company. Our old lease was coming up - and we had outgrown our old office, so it was time to find a new home. We found some fantastic floor space in San Francisco, at the end of '06. The majority of our staff live in the South Bay/Peninsula. At that time, the commute from Caltrain to that new office was approx 20 minutes. After the T Line service was introduced full time, I started coming into town to start wrapping the legal paperwork up. Confusion, rude staff and delayed trains meant that my journey was consistently longer - one time, it took 50 minutes. Although I could have walked to the new office space and back - twice - in that timeframe, I'm not sure our staff would have wanted to. We backed out of the deal and are now looking again for something closer to our current home. The risk of losing staff was too high.

217 agree | 201 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:54 AM MST on Sat., May. 19, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Alan Scott said:
To the Reader asking the question about one-car trains; the short answer is there are not enough cars, on paper or physically, for every scheduled train to be two-cars, and at 3 million dollars a pop, Muni can't just run out and grab one off the shelf. There are 12 single cars scheduled for the T line - 15 were purchased with 3 being spares. The J and K lines are scheduled as single-car trains while the L, M and N lines are scheduled for two-car trains during the day. So if you happen to see a one-car M or N train during rush hour, you can safely bet there are maintenance problems that Muni can't get the cars out. Not having enough cars is not an operator shortage as they may have you believe but rather a maintenance issue. The cars are way over-engineered thereby making them very costly to maintain. One can hope that the next order of cars would be less complex but that is not likely as that would bring in questions of job security. Isn't that what it's all about with city employ

192 agree | 160 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:12 PM MST on Thu., May. 17, 2007 re: "Commuters sound off about Muni changes"

Examiner Reader said:
Can someone PLEASE explain to me why one-car trains are being used during rush hour?? Morning and evening hours - one-car trains are packed so full no one can get on. Every single train during rush hour should be a two-car train without exception. If one can manage to try and squeeze on a one-car train, we're subject to being yelled at by the driver, "there are more trains behind me." Is that what public transportation is about; having to wait to get on a train because of over-crowded one-car trains?

246 agree | 226 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:14 PM MST on Thu., May. 17, 2007 re: "Commuters sound off about Muni changes"

SF to Palo Alto commuter said:
I moved to the city in December to the Lower Haight. I used to pick up the N-Judah at Duboce Park and take it straight to Caltrain. It was reliable and clean, if crowded. Now I have to take two (way dirtier) busses to do the same thing. I drive more because of this. What adds insult to injury is the busses are completely unreliable for the evening commute. Moreover, this morning, I had to watch as three (!) busses blew past me and others at Haight & Divis. Needless to say, I missed my Muni connection downtown. Thus, missed my Caltrain connection. Three hour commutes. Thanks, Muni! I love the T!

250 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:34 PM MST on Thu., May. 17, 2007 re: "Commuters sound off about Muni changes"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly, the problems on the T- Third pale in comparison to the Treasure Island 108. We need to have all of our supervisors forced to spend one week taking the 108 to discover how many times it is truly late or does not run. The passengers who live on Treasure Island are getting worse service. Not once has Muni held a public hearing on Treasure Island. If you call a cab no one can find your house as the street maps are poorly written. This is the line most affected by Bay Bridge, Bay to Breakers or any special event downtown. There has been no special compensation. Then having to wait for a bus in a filthy bus terminal with passengers who smoke while waiting is no fun. Last due to a lack of police presence on the island all of the bus shelters have been vandalized. I say the recall for supervisor should be directed to Chris Daly. The only supervisor who visits just once a year.

238 agree | 245 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:06 AM MST on Thu., May. 17, 2007 re: "Commuters sound off about Muni changes"

Potrero Hill Rider said:
Since the T Turtle has taken away the 15. I can no longer get to and from Potrero Hill in a timely fashion from SOMA. The 10 line has become a joke. I regularly wait 15 to 30 minutes at 2nd and Howard for a bus only to find it is a 'short line' that only goes to 7th and Townsend or Caltrain depending on the driver’s whim. The 10 was one of the more reliable Muni Buses prior to the demise of the 15. In addition some drivers don’t even follow the new 10 route in the SOMA area. Muni knew this change was not going to work back in February and instead of fixing the problems first. They went on their way to practice on the riders. They were short drivers of the trains, train were broken and knew the T took over 10 minutes longer to do the route. More often than I can count I have a long wait for at Caltrain or give up and walk through less than safe areas along 7th street to get home. It is time to take politics out of Muni and get a contractor that can run the system in a

247 agree | 231 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:56 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Muni open to systemwide remedies"

Alan Scott said:
As I mentioned before, the real problem with the Muni is political - the elected officials and the riders. The mayor hires the Director. The Board of Supes and the mayor appoint the MTA Board. They serve at the pleasure of the appointers so therefore, MTA director and board will not upset the applecart by making the necessary moves to clean up the incompetence, as a thorough cleaning of the organization will rile the various unions to a strike. The mayor and the Board of Supes have to have the courage to stand up to the unions and let them know, " if you go on strike, then it's considered job abandonment and you will be replaced!" The riders and readers of this paper need to demand the mayor and board to fix the problem even with the threat of a strike. Yeah, it's an inconvenience but sometimes the results may be worth it. The last time Muni went on strike was in 1975 - I think it lasted about a month. I remember having to walk to school. Maybe it's time to clean house again!

273 agree | 243 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:14 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Muni open to systemwide remedies"

Joe Quintana 2 said:
Who are these people running MUNI? I can’t believe their audacity in revealing their willingness to make fools out of them self’s. What a behemoth bureaucracy. Can’t they do anything right? Do these people (MUNI) have half a brain? I remember when Mayor Gavin Newsom made a speech when he first came into office how he was going to hire “THE BEST AND THE BRIGHTEST“- well if MUNI represents his concept of what BEST AND BRIGHTEST is San Francisco can only foresee a continuance of the same old rhetoric and mediocre vision of what a WORLD CLASS CITY transportation system should be. How hard can it be to do the right think?

247 agree | 250 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:17 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Muni open to systemwide remedies"

Examiner Reader said:
Unless the system is privatized and run like a real business, MUNI will continue its long tradition of corruption and incompetence. The civil service union won't tolerate excellence - look at the record. So sit back, and enjoy the socialist downhill slide San Francisco!

274 agree | 267 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:04 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "T-Third frustrations are widespread"

Examiner Reader said:
how do we break the muni union? let's buy them out and hire real people that care and will work an honest day, from the top to the bottom. it's time for change.

241 agree | 259 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:52 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Muni open to systemwide remedies"

Pen said:
Please, we need the N-Judah to go west of 19th Avenue. For the past 5 weeks, the N has been regularly dumping it's passengers off 2 miles before the end of the line. I might complain about having to walk a couple miles home around midnight on a Friday, but to do this to the elderly and disabled is a crime. Shame on you Muni. Shame on you.

274 agree | 258 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:07 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Muni open to systemwide remedies"

Examiner Reader said:
Yes! Restore the 15 and the N going to Caltrain. My commute to work takes a lot longer since both the T and K run very sporatically and most of the time I just walk now because that is quicker. Also, I will NEVER take the T to school again after the 30 minute delay it had I just ended up walking almost a mile to school. Not to mention the T is usually a single train that is overcrowded. The 15 although dirty, scrappy and loud, was a very reliable route and I miss it a lot.

263 agree | 292 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 28, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Ziggy Tomcich said:
Why doesn't Muni just click the "undo" button and temporarily suspend the T-third lightrail until they are capable of providing faster and more reliable service then the buses that they replaced. Currently no one has benefited from this Beta test of the T-Third lightrail, and everyone who rides the Muni subway has been affected by this.

261 agree | 188 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:03 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 26, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Examiner Reader said:
MUNI will never work the way it should because you have generation upon generation of workers with entitlement attitudes running things. There are no negative repurcussions as long as the worker shows up for his/her shift and doesn't commit an act of physical violence or vandalism. There is no way to get rid of them, short of busting the protectionist unions (and let's face it, that is never going to happen in San Francisco). MUNI can't be fixed.

266 agree | 251 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Joe Quintana said:
MUNI is all about passing the buck, no accountability and of course underachiever work ethics. The same holds for our S.F. Mayor and Supervisors. Nathaniel Ford and his staff should have been fired a long time ago along with our so called Supervisors - who by the way have no clue how to fix San Francisco's transportation problems. If Nathaniel Ford doesn't have the desire to fix MUNI then it's time we get new people in there that have the skills to do the job right!!!

265 agree | 206 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:11 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Examiner Reader said:
Yesterday it took me almost an hour to get home, from civic center to forest hill. One of my colleagues who lives in Novato had a faster ride.

263 agree | 225 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:06 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

KE said:
I live near 4th and King and I can tell you that the problems with the T-line have not been corrected. The trains are ALWAYS crowded and should be two car trains. These bozos drive in from the East Bay every day and just don't give a toss about the service to the passengers. The fact that they knew this would be a problem is inexcusable.

263 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:55 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Guy Lauten said:
While your 4/25/07 article accurately points out how many MUNI drivers do not show up for work (something for which I would be fired if I tried), it seems to concentrate only on the problems with the Metro rail lines. I take MUNI every day to and from work, and have done so for over 20 years. I live in the Excelsior district, and find the quickest way to get downtown to be getting on BART at Glen Park Station (BART has a much better on-time record than MUNI). However, getting to Glen Park Station can be quite a trial in the morning. When it does come along, the 44 line bus is always totally full and impossible to get on. It is similarly packed on the return trip home in the afternoon. What good is it for a bus to be on-time if there is no room for the riders to get on? No one seems to be addressing what I see as the deeper problem with MUNI, which is that it is organized for the benefit of the drivers and not the riding public. I have written to MUNI's complaint email addr

245 agree | 238 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:01 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "Ford: Muni issues are ‘institutional’"

Alan Scott said:
The key problem with Muni is the amount of dead-weight up and down the organization - institutional is correct!! If Nat Ford has to micro-manage the operations of the Metro, then what does that say about the competency of the operations staff? What does it say about the competency of the support staff if there is staff hired but vehicles are still in need of repair or shortage of parts? The real fix of the "institutional" problem is political: Ford and the MTA need to get rid of the dead weight and all those that hate their jobs and do minimal work. Gavin, the Board of Supes, and Muni riders have to be able to stand up to the union that if they strike because of management raising the performance bar and/or replacing personnel, then the striking workers will be replaced, and mean it. Muni, in general is a great organization, and serves the city well when running optimally, but the dead-weight has to go in order for Muni to meet its Prop E mandate. And the sooner, the better!

267 agree | 256 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "T-Third strands riders, clogs tunnel"

Examiner Reader said:
They expected the problems??!! Then why was the T Line opened when it was? Was anybody using their head? Incredibly bad planning - 10 years in the making.

262 agree | 271 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:44 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007 re: "T-Third frustrations are widespread"

Sunset resident with sore feet said:
Don't expect even remotely reliable N-Judah service west of 19th Avenue. The trains get so far behind schedule, that they are very frequently turned around before reaching the outer Sunset. I'm really tired of walking the last 2 miles of my commute home! The awful performance started over a week before the T officially opened. Perhaps Ford himself should ride the N-Judah one day this week to find out just how bad it really is.

268 agree | 259 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:13 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "T-Third frustrations are widespread"

Andrew said:
I live in SF and I'm tired of all these MUNI problems and excuses. Any idea how this person was able to start this petition and get MUNI to actually listen? Any input would help because it's time for San Franciscan's to start speaking up. Also, do you know if there is an already established organization in SF that is trying to advocate for change, like the Straphangers Campaign in New York City?

294 agree | 279 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:07 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "T-Third frustrations are widespread"

Caltrin Commuter said:
I have been taking Caltrain daily for over a year now and find it a convenient and environmentally-friendly way to get into San Francisco. Unfortunately, with the recent changes to Muni, specifically the way that service is provided to the Caltrain station, I am seriously considering switching to BART or even driving to work. I cannot rely on Muni to get me to and from Caltrain anymore. I have arrived at work late numerous times in the past few weeks due to Muni trains running late, not having enough space, and not knowing if the next car will arrive at the 4th and King station or the T-third station. I have missed the Caltrain multiple times in the past few weeks due to delays and full Muni light rail cars. It seems incredible to me that Muni would have made these changes to the service at 4th and King without thinking through the impacts that they would have on Caltrain riders.

288 agree | 281 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)