Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - More than 100 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority bus and train operators took home paychecks topping $100,000 in fiscal 2006 because of lush overtime earnings that have skewed Metro’s budget and sent pension costs spiraling out of control under a uniquely generous employee retirement plan.
Overall, Metro paid its employees $70 million in overtime in 2006 and is on track to spend the same amount in this budget year, according to a recent audit report, continuing a trend of high overtime costs that have plagued Metro’s budgets for years.
This story continues below
Advertisement
|
Roughly $30 million of the overtime payments went to Metro’s 2,400 bus operators and 500 train operators, 125 of whom earned more than $100,000 that year. Another 284 hourly Metro workers in other departments earned more than $100,000 because of overtime. Only 180 of Metro’s salaried management employees earned more than $100,000.
In some cases, the overtime wages accounted for nearly half of an operator's annual paycheck, meaning the employee is working significantly more than the usual 40 hours each week. Thirty operators took home more than $50,000 in overtime.
The two highest-paid train operators, who earned $153,759 and $152,891 respectively, earned $74,208 and $73,659 in overtime. The highest-paid bus operators collected $127,653 and $126,457, received $53,696 and $52,490, in overtime. In other cases, overtime accounted for almost 50 percent of an employee’s paychecks in 2006.
Overtime hours are paid at 1 1/2 times the employee's usual hourly rate, making regular use of overtime expensive. Metro General Manager John Catoe, who took over in January, hopes to reduce overtime as part of his strategy to cut costs and keep Metro’s budget balanced.
Metro staff hop on overtime gravy train WHO MADE A KILLING IN OVERTIME: Metro Workforce Compensation 2006 Overtime List |
Overtime work costs Metro more than other regional transit agencies because the system's retirement policy includes overtime payments when calculating pension payments, a rarity in transit agencies elsewhere. The policy means Metro is paying vastly higher pensions to employees than they would receive if their retirement payments were based on regular hourly earnings.
The increasing cost of pensions was one of the chief reasons Metro officials cited when they proposed fare increases in December. Catoe has since shelved the fare-increase idea while he looks for new ways to slice spending.
Metro Board of Directors member Ray Bricuso said the rich overtime system “needs to stop. An employee who makes $65,000 can work a lot of overtime their final years on the job and make $100,000 a year. That would increase their annual pension to about $80,000 for what is really a $65,000 job.”
Stopping this practice may not be easy.
Metro’s employee union enjoys immense clout when it negotiates contracts with Metro’s board, which is not profit-focused like the board of directors of a private company. They are political appointees and often are also elected officials, who are concerned with pleasing voters — such as Metro’s 10,000 employees.
“The make up of the board is heavily political, let’s leave it at that,” Metro Board Chairman Charles Deegan said.
Even with the lavish pension system, Metro has difficulty attracting top job candidates because of its unusual hiring practices.
Until recently, Metro required that bus operators spend up to a year as part-time employees, positions that come without the health insurance and other benefits of full-time employment. Metro also has a long-standing policy that it will hire only bus operators to fill open train-operator positions.
Some board members say they think these policies make it hard to expand the work force, which would allow Metro to cut back on overtime. These practices also saddle Metro with a large pool of inexperienced bus operators because many job candidates do not want to start off earning a part-time salary with no benefits.
Critics of the system believe that lack of experience is one reason Metrobus operators have been involved in so many accidents in the past year. None of the highly paid, experienced drivers were involved in any of the crashes.
Even as its fiscal situation grows more dire, Metro is expanding its service, creating a higher demand for bus and train operators. Metro Chief Bus Operating Officer Jack Requa said the agency has expanded its training program for bus drivers to get more new hires behind the wheel sooner.
Metro’s high overtime outlays would suggest that the system is short of personnel. Metro reports having just 70 vacancies out of 2,400 bus operator positions.
“It may be that we should hire more operators,” Catoe said. “We need to consider hiring more operators if it means cutting down on overtime.”



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:01 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 21, 2008 re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
6:22 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
7:47 PM MST on Sun., Feb. 17, 2008
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
4:44 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 1, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 22, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
7:28 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 21, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
7:51 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 19, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 19, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
3:44 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 16, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
2:44 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 15, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
10:15 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 12, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
8:42 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 12, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
1:54 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 12, 2007
re: "Metro drivers make $100,000 in pay"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
as a former,now retired metro employee i and others have always been concern about our retirement program.You are correct our pensions are based on your best 4 years.Personally i think that it is extremely unfair to those of whom overtime is not available,because the overtime system is regulated so that those ,of whose names are on the board for work get first work.This board was established to be able me cover all work that would come open sometimes at the last minute,to ensure the service to the public did -not suffer.WE have often discussed and submitted at our union contract negotiations the need for a higher mutiplier which would make a tremendous difference across the board in terms of hours work. Also,i would like to see more "ATTENTION, focused on investments for
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe said:
Now we know why some are sleepy due to so many hours and padding their pensions and why they are running people down in the street due to being too tired to drive. Also, shouldn't Congress look into this?
172 agree | 173 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Examiner is not fit to be used as toilet paper.
146 agree | 139 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Contrary to some of the previous comments, race has much to do with Metro's troubles. Perhaps if they diversified their deliberately engineered and discriminatory, racially homogenous driver force and allowed some white drivers back in, they wouldn't be saddled with such a large pool of inexperianced operators. Considering that virtually all of Metro's drivers and operators are black, in a system that covers a greater metro area which is still at least 50% white, the outrageously biased demagraphic disparity becomes blatantly obvious. As it stands now, this is just another example of a corrupt spoils system needing a major overhaul, full of the wrong people who see their jobs as a birthright and society as owing them unlimited recompense for alleged past misdeeds.
389 agree | 358 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Lets get real, I think it speaks volumes the USAF pilot makes significantly less than a bus driver. Now consider, a pilot in an emergency must find a runway to land on, & make split second decisions at 500mph+. I've been following this issue for sometime, it isn’t' about race (I see employees of all races), but rather how their overtime pay is tied to their retirement, etc. Given the skills to drive buses & trains they deserve good pay, however this is a skilled job but no college required & should reflect this. As to being cheaper to pay overtime than hire someone & pay benefits, the answer like other organizations is to use contractors where benefits are paid by the contracting company. Finally (soap box), I've lived many places outside the capital region and I must say this area is ripe with corruption (metro parking attendants stealing millions a few years back). METRO & this area need to have some morals and rid the area of this standard "rip off the company or taxpayer".
458 agree | 409 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Quote: Why is that when afro-americans work hard, make money it becomes a problem?" Ok, what does race have to do w/it? The article didn't mention anything about. It's metro's board fault as to why so many employees are snatchin up o/t like that. I think Metro bus drivers should make no less than 35k starting. They do put up w/a lot of b.s. daily and i know because i ride the bus.
412 agree | 405 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why is that when afro-americans work hard, make money it becomes a problem? I am a bus operator and what I encounter every day, plus I work overtime still isn't enough money for all that I put up with on a daily bases. Try becoming a operator for 1 hour you would know that we deserve every penny that we earn and then some. We do love our passengers and want to get them to they're destination in a safe manner, whether it is by us working overtime or not. Find the positive side in our positions.
564 agree | 1,404 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If you going to post personal information in your newspaper, you should also post every employee in this area income, and make sure you include they're names, titles, employer, and salaries. In that way identity theft can increase in this area.
610 agree | 535 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How many of these drivers have been involved in acccidents.
635 agree | 471 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why exactly is it wrong that the bus drivers are making this kind of money? As the article points out, they are working overtime. Shouldn't hard work be rewarded? Aren't these drivers performing work that is very useful to society?
542 agree | 450 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dang. I am a military pilot and I make maybe 1/3 of what they are getting.
559 agree | 482 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
And Virginia is a right to work state. Try getting a Metro job without joining the union. Metro is essentially a DC creature with all its faults, but it is subsidized heavily by MD and VA. Good job. Someone should tilt at windmills.
498 agree | 501 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The key info that we need to know if this is a big deal or not is how much it cost in benefits to hire more workers. In general if they have a good enough benefits package it might be cheaper to pay the overtime than hire the additional people to get rid of the overtime. Health care is extremely expensive as are pension plans, vacation, social security tax and such. In the example you gave about the train drivers with base salary of approximately $80k and overtime of $75k he or she is working on average about 25 hours overtime a week. So over a years time 8 such workers take the place of 13 40 hour a week people. That means you don’t have to pay for health care for 5 additional families, you don’t have to cover for 5 additional workers taking vacations, and when they retire you are paying 8 $122k pensions for a total of $976k/ year instead of 13 $64k pensions for $832k/year. Once you get past approximately $95k/year salary there is also no additional Social security tax paid. Th
542 agree | 549 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree