Christopher Hitchens reignites exclusive Vanity Fair party
One of Christopher Hitchens’ favorite party moments at his Kalorama house occurred years back, when Barbra Streisand caught on fire and author Christopher Buckley extinguished the flames.
“That was a great moment in my life,” Hitchens told Yeas & Nays.
Well, the good times are here again, as Hitchens and his wife, Carol Blue, are bringing back what has historically been one of the most exclusive parties following the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner: The Vanity Fair After-Party.
“[Vanity Fair Editor-in-Chief] Graydon Carter has decided that he wants to revive it,” said Hitchens, who himself is a regular columnist for the magazine. Vanity Fair writer Todd Purdum and his wife, Dee Dee Myers, (a former press secretary in the Clinton White House) also are hosting.
Once considered the pre-eminent after-party, the Vanity Fair bash bid farewell after 1999, with the conventional wisdom being that it simply became too much of a fuss. Bloomberg’s after-parties became the successor, although in Hitchens’ words, that annual soiree “has become rather mediocre and tacky.”
The prolific man of letters also confessed to having not attended the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in many years.
“I find it pretty tedious,” Hitchens said. “The food is uniformly lousy, the comedian is not great and I hate sitting through the awards. I don’t like seeing the press fawning on the president and I don’t like seeing the president fawn over the press.”
The Vanity Fair party at the Hitchens/Blue house on April 21 will certainly be a hot ticket since his best estimate is that it can hold only 200 people (far fewer than the Bloomberg Party at the Costa Rican Embassy, the Capitol File magazine party at the Colombian ambassador’s residence and the Reuters party at the Four Seasons Terrace).
No word yet on which VIPs will be in attendance, but Hitchens says that he believes Jane Fonda will be there, and he’s asked Clint Eastwood and Sean Penn to attend also. Vanity Fair is handling the invitations and that’s perfectly fine by him.
“If you give a party, you make more enemies than friends,” he said.
On purpose or not, first lady gives a nod to No. 42
During Monday’s annual White House Easter Egg Roll, first lady Laura Bush read the popular children’s book “Duck for President” to a throng of children and parents surrounding her on the South Lawn. The book tells the story of a duck named — you guessed it — “Duck,” who gets elected president of the United States.
But it was this specific passage that caused a few people to chuckle (at least the adults who remember the 1992 presidential campaign) as Laura read it aloud.
“That night, Duck and his staff started working on posters for the presidential election. Duck left his staff in charge and hit the campaign trail. He kissed babies in local diners. He rode in parades. He gave speeches that only other ducks could understand. He even played the saxophone on late-night television.”
Much to her credit, the first lady didn’t flinch as she read over that obvious allusion to former President Bill Clinton’s sax-playing appearance on the “Arsenio Hall Show” as he ran for president in 1992.
Other Bushies who took a turn reading to the children Monday:
» Lynne Cheney, “America: A Patriotic Primer,” by Lynne Cheney
» Carlos Gutierrez, “Duck on a Bike,” by David Shannon
» Michael Leavitt w/Mrs. Leavitt, “Faux Paw’s Adventures in the Internet: Keeping Children Safe Online,” by Jacalyn Leavitt
» Dirk Kempthorne, “Officer Buckle and Gloria,” by Peggy Rathmann
» Josh Bolten, “Arthur Meets the President,” by Marc Brown
» Alphonso Jackson, “Green Eggs and Ham,” by Dr. Seuss
» Margaret Spellings, “Teacher’s Pets,” by Dayle Ann Dodds
» Henry Paulson w/ Mrs. Paulson, “When Agnes Caws,” by Candace Fleming.
Sweeney: 911 call ‘simply what happens sometimes in families’
Ex-Rep. John Sweeney, R-N.Y., said he isn’t sure how a 911 call placed by his wife in 2005 became public last year, but on Monday, he brushed off her charges against him at the time as “simply what happens sometimes in families.”
Sweeney’s wife, Gayle, called 911 late at night in December 2005 claiming that the congressman was “knocking her around the house.”
The police report stated that she had scratches on her face and that she spent the night at a friend’s house.
Coverage of the incident might have contributed to Sweeney’s loss to Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand last fall.
Sweeney was interviewed Monday on WROW in New York, which was immediately reported by the New York Observer’s “Politicker” blog.
Sweeney said the incident and the phone call were “simply what happens sometimes in families.”
“We didn’t deny that a call was made,” he said. “We didn’t deny there had been problems in my family at that particular time.”
No Mitt at the movies
When Academy Award winner Jon Voight hosts “a very special private screening” of Christopher Cain’s new film, “September Dawn,” today at the Motion Picture Association of America’s Eye Street movie theater, you might see some VIPs in the audience, but you won’t see anyone from the presidential campaign of Mitt Romney.
The fictional love story in “September Dawn” (which also features Trent Ford, Tamara Hope, Terrence Stamp and Dean Cain) is set against the nonfictional historical tragedy of the slaughter of 120 innocent pioneers by zealous Mormons in 1857.
Does the release of this movie, which already is getting favorable reviews from movie critics, spell trouble for Romney, who is Mormon? After all, the Mormons involved in this particular historical incident in Utah don’t exactly come out looking favorably.
“We reached out to the Romney campaign,” said one source involved with the film. “But up to now, they haven’t seen it due to scheduling conflicts. We would certainly make special arrangements for them to see the movie at any time that is convenient for them.”



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate