Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Doubt shroud's Jesus' tomb

Apr 7, 2007 3:43 AM (605 days ago) by Kevin McGhee, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
The entrance of the tomb purported to belong to Jesus of Nazareth, showing a chevron and circle marking.
(Courtesy of the Israeli Antiquities Authority)
The entrance of the tomb purported to belong to Jesus of Nazareth, showing a chevron and circle marking.
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - This Sunday, hundreds of millions of Christians will celebrate their holiest day of the year. Easter is the day that Christians all over the world celebrate their belief in the bodily resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.

Christian doctrine teaches that Jesus was violently executed on a Roman cross on a day that has become known as “Good Friday,” and that he bodily rose from the dead on Easter Sunday

The Apostle Paul wrote, “And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith.” Recently, the Discovery Channel made a startling announcement, which if proven true, would undermine this central tenet of Christianity.

“New scientific evidence, including DNA analysis conducted at one of the world's foremost molecular genetics laboratories, as well as studies by leading scholars, suggests a 2,000-year-old Jerusalem tomb could have once held the remains of Jesus of Nazareth and his family,” reported Jennifer Viegas, of Discovery News.

This story continues below
Advertisement

In a widely publicized television special, producer James Cameron, famed for the movie “Titanic,” asked viewers to believe that Jesus bones had been found, that he was married to Mary Magdalene, and that they had a son together named Judah.

His story has an echo of Dan Brown's famous Da Vinci Code, and the vast majority of reputable scholars have skeptically responded that it shares another similarity with the popular book — both are works of fiction.

The producers of “The Lost Tomb of Jesus” knew that by “proving” Jesus body was still in his grave, their show would generate a great deal of controversy. Scholars from both inside and outside of Christianity have lined up to debunk the purported science that Cameron and director Simcha Jacobovici unveiled on their show.

AN OLD “NEW” DISCOVERY

The “new” discovery of the tomb actually took place on March 28, 1980. A construction crew was preparing to build an apartment complex in Talpiot, Jerusalem, when they uncovered an ancient tomb. Archaeologists from the Israeli Antiquities Authority were called to the site and the tomb was excavated.

Inside the tomb were 10 ossuaries, small boxes made from stone that were used to hold collected bone fragments. The burial practice of the day called for the deceased to be wrapped in cloth — a “shroud” — and after a year, the tomb was re-entered and their bones placed in an ossuary.

Frequently, the ossuaries were labeled with the name of the deceased. The Aramaic inscription on one of the bone boxes found in the Talpiot tomb was “Jesus” and two others had a form of the name “Mary.” From these inscriptions, the filmmakers built the rest of their story. They employed DNA to “prove” that the Jesus and Mary in the tomb were not related — and concluded they were married. They employed questionable calculations to suggest that it was a statistical certainty that this Jesus and this Mary were the biblical figures. Their attempt to create proof from assumptions has been widely criticized.

EXPERTS ARE NOT CONVICED

Stephen Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land is not convinced that the name "Jesus" on the stone box was read correctly because ancient Semitic script is difficult to decipher. Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site is quick to point out that the names on the boxes are the most common of all names among Jewish people of that time.

Dr. Craig L. Blomberg, Distinguished Professor of New Testament at Denver Seminary has demonstrated that the inscription that allegedly identifies the remains of Mary Magdalene is actually three Greek words that should be translated Mary the Master, a title with no connection to the biblical Mary. Biblical archaeologists and scholars from many fields have lined up to say that the cable channel, which bills itself as “the number-one nonfiction media company,” missed the mark this time.

This Easter, despite the Discovery Channel show, most Christians will continue to believe that if Jesus' tomb is ever discovered, it will be empty.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:03 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "Jesus' resurrection called into question"

Examiner Reader said:
Dear by Karl B. Hille, "Jesus' resurrection called into question" dated April 3, 2007, The Examiner states literally "The Quran teaches that Jesus was divinely conceived, resurrected after crucifixion and physically taken into heaven to await an eventual return to Earth." You saying "The Quran teaches that Jesus was divinely conceived, resurrected after crucifixion" is wrong because The Quran teaches Jesus was not killed nor crucified according to 4:157 & 158 "That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not. Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise." Therefore, I look forward to seeing you correcting such a doctrinal error that I have shown you and also quoting sources of the Holy So

196 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:07 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 26, 2007 re: "Experts question testing DNA found in tomb"

Examiner Reader said:
Books are coming out now that have taken an in-depth review of the Jesus Family Tomb such as "The Jesus Tomb: Is It Fact or Fiction?". When the evidence is reviewed carefully, what we find is recycled news from the 1990s.

229 agree | 208 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 21, 2007 re: "Experts question testing DNA found in tomb"

Examiner Reader said:
A helpful reminder that careful research by qualified specialists, which is also verified by other researchers, is done before more than very tentative conclusions are drawn.

218 agree | 224 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:17 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 8, 2007

Examiner Reader said:
It's not true that the Qur'an says Prophet Jesus was resurrected; in Islam Jesus was never actually crucified. Judas was crucified in his place and Jesus was raised to heaven and will return, but he was never crucified according to Islam. You have misquoted imam Syed Naqvi.

170 agree | 173 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement