Carter staying out of hometown ‘low-rider’ debate
Rule No. 1 on the road to success: Never forget your roots. And that includes you, Jimmy Carter.
Even though the former president is known to many as just a plain ol’ fella from Plains, Ga., he has failed to pick up on one big issue percolating in his own hometown: low-riding pants.
The Plains City Council has asked the town’s attorney to draft an ordinance that would punish individuals wearing low-slung pants (a fashion fad known as “sagging” or “low-riding”). The council expects to hear back from the city attorney within the next month or two.
Naturally, we thought that the opinion of Plains’ most famous resident — and one-time leader of the free world — could make or break the city council’s hopes on this high-priority, low-waistline issue. But when Yeas & Nays asked Carter to chime in on the danger of droopy drawers, he had to admit that he knew nothing of it.
“I just met with the mayor the other day and he didn’t bring it up,” Carter said, adding with a laugh, “so I don’t think there’s any danger of you being afflicted by that issue anytime soon.” (For the record: Yeas & Nays fully utilizes belts.) Carter was in Washington to accept the Ridenhour Courage Prize and deliver remarks at the National Press Club.
But the Plains City Council sure hopes that Carter comes to the rescue and backs this bill. “His support would be very valuable,” Plains City Clerk Willette Smith said. She’s confident that, once Carter moves his attention away from Palestine and toward pant lines, he’ll support the Council’s proposed ban.
“I’m sure if he knew the importance from the council and a lot of the citizens here in Plains, he would definitely support it,” Smith said. She even hopes that Carter might pull some presidential weight and “put some heat on the city attorney so that he’ll speed up the process a little bit.”
Now that’d be a creative use of presidential power.
Lone NYC holdout for Hillary harbors a political grudge
The entire New York Democratic congressional delegation has endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for president — except one. That would be Rep. Yvette Clarke, a freshman from Brooklyn.
Confirming rumors, she stated this week in an interview with John Noel of WNBC Channel 4 in New York that she’s holding out because Clinton adviser Howard Wolfson had worked on the primary campaign of David Yassky, who was one of Clarke’s opponents in last year’s race to succeed the retiring Rep. Major Owens.
“Of course that raises a big flag, you know, puts up an antenna because again that was an issue that the community was very ill at ease with,” Clarke said. “And we’ve had some conversations about it to be quite honest with you. And I think that that needs to be addressed in order for the community to feel like that something like that would not occur again.”
Wolfson then told the New York Observer’s Politicker blog that his “work for David Yassky was based on a decade of friendship with him. I have enormous respect for Congresswoman Clarke and look forward to supporting her re-election.”
A spokeswoman for Clarke did not return a message left with her office.
Thomas: Don’t forget, Lanier’s one of mine
Call it a case of neighborhood pride. During Tuesday’s meeting of the D.C. Council, Council Member Phil Mendelson reported that the Public Safety and the Judiciary Committee, which he chairs, had favorably reported on the nomination of interim Police Chief Cathy Lanier to officially and permanently assume the post.
Mendelson has just finished listing her virtues and qualifications, when Council Member Harry Thomas interjected: “I just want to make sure the residency requirements have been fulfilled and do you have that address?”
Mendelson was on to him. “I think Council Member Thomas knows that the chief is living in his ward,” he said. “Police officers are usually a little bit hesitant to give out their home addresses, but she does live in the District — and in Ward 5.”
Council Chair Vincent Gray then wanted to know: “Does that create a public safety advantage for Mr. Thomas?”
“Yes, it does,” Mendelson replied.
Dennis Miller coming to Leesburg
After nearly a month, conservative comic Dennis Miller’s new radio show has a home in the D.C. area.
“The Dennis Miller Show,” which launched nationwide last month on the Westwood One syndicate, will air from 9 a.m. to noon on WAGE-AM out of Leesburg, Va. The blog DCRTV.com broke the news.
WAGE General Manager Dave Scarangella said Miller’s show was “on in eight of the top 10 markets in the country, but it wasn’t here, so it was a superb opportunity. … Our lineup did not have that mix of politics and humor. His show was exactly what we’re looking for.”
With Miller’s arrival, WAGE moves Joy Browne’s show to the 1 p.m. slot.
Occidental to unveil new faces
Over the years, the Occidental Restaurant on Pennsylvania Avenue has become famous not only for the VIPs who dine there, but for the VIPs who hang from their walls: Nearly 1,700 photos — from Amelia Earhart to Winston Churchill to JFK — adorn the walls of the restaurant’s two floors. It’s become a virtual “Who’s Who” of Washington, hence the restaurant’s motto: “Where Statesmen Dine.”
Now, in celebration of the restaurant’s 100th birthday, a panel of Washington VIPs has been selected to choose 20 additional portraits to put on the wall. But to have an eye for successful people, it helps to be somewhat successful yourself. The panel members:
» Judy Woodruff, news correspondent for The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer (currently on the wall)
» Mark Tuohey III, Managing Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP (currently on the wall)
» Jim Kimsey, founder of AOL and philanthropist
» Stan Kasten, president, Washington Nationals
» Chuck Conconi, Qorvis Communications and former editor of Washingtonian’s “Capital Comment”
Restaurant owners Oliver & Phil Carr will then take the panel’s suggestions and make the final decision. The new faces will be unveiled May 2 at the restaurant.



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate