WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Congress has loaded up President Bush's request for "emergency" spending on the Iraq war with more than $20 billion in "pork" for members' districts.

Money for peanut storage in Georgia, spinach growers in California, menhaden in the Atlantic Ocean and even more office space for the lawmakers themselves is included in what has ballooned into a $124 billion war bill.

"This emergency supplemental bill has more ornaments hanging over our many branches of government than the White House Christmas tree," Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., said.

Originally, Bush asked for $105 billion in emergency funding. Democratic leaders say they want to grant the request to continue funding the war despite their desire to end it.

"We have provided all of the money the president requested- and more," boasted House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer.

That includes $74 million for peanut storage, $25 million for spinach growers and $100 million for citrus growers.

It also includes $16 million to convert the old Food and Drug Administration building in southwest D.C. into more office space for the Capitol. That "emergency" expenditure comes at a time when taxpayers already shell out $600 million "more than double the original estimate" for a mammoth expansion of the Capitol, which includes 160,000 feet of new office space.

---

You may also be interested in these stories:

Democrats Predict Passage of Iraq Bill

Few Tough Choices in Senate Dems' Budget

Open Government Bills Stir Veto Threats

---

Lewis accused House leaders of trying to "paper over Democrat divisions on the war in Iraq by delivering billions of dollars in unrelated and unauthorized spending that is somehow given an emergency designation."

Hoyer denied the charge from Lewis, who himself was famous for his own pork spending when he served as Appropriations Committee chairman under Republican control.

"They are a strange group to talk about buying votes," Hoyer chuckled. "This is the crowd that took pork barrel spending to new levels of irresponsibility."

The 172-page spending bill will get its first public airing today at an Appropriations Committee meeting, where panel members expect to approve it.

Rep. Mark Kirk, an Illinois Republican who sits on the committee, said he will try amending the bill today. First, he wants to strip out the non-emergency, member-requested spending and force it to go through the normal appropriations process. Under newly approved Democratic rules, that would require offsets to pay for the new spending.

Kirk also wants to entirely eliminate money for spinach farmers.

"Spinach farmers in California should not be getting emergency war spending money," he said.

churt@dcexaminer.com

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:06 PM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Congress loads up $20 billion in pork"

wayne hutchings said:
the dems throw out their chests, decry the war, get the pork and prove they are the same as the neocons

269 agree | 256 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:49 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007 re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"

Examiner Reader said:
Fixing Social Secuirty is a breeze--and no reductions in benefits or increase in retirement age is necessary. You make it a true defined benefit pension system by changing PayGo to actuarial advance funding using an actuarial cost method called Entry Age Normal. This will allow you to invest a substantial part of the assets in stocks or stock like investments once the short term cash outflows are taken care of by Treasuries. The excess of stock returns long term over Treasury bills is huge--around 6-7% per year. Compunded annually it makes all the difference. I estimate that we already have enough money in Treasuries--around 2 trillion dollars and this is around 4 times one year's cah payout--more than enough. In fact, the SS actuaries forecasts show we do not need any more money until about 2041, or around 34 years from now. For example, just put an additional $50 billion a year into the system and invest it all in a low-cost broad based stock index fund, and that will fix it!

275 agree | 319 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

3:03 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007 re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"

Examiner Reader said:
It's a shame and a disgrace how our people in Wash. D.C. seem to avert the Social Security and Medicare issues. Then again, why should they be concerned they will not have to rely on either of the two issues and I am sure they will syphon off funds for "more pressing" concerns. The Seniors don't seem to count and are more of a liability than they used to be,

267 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate