FOX tickles conservatives’ funny bones with satire
Most political junkies love “The Daily Show,” but those on the right don’t always agree with host Jon Stewart’s politics. Well, pretty soon, they’ll have their own alternative: Fox News Channel’s “The Half-Hour News Hour,” which debuts this Sunday. Hosted by comedians Kurt Long and Jennifer Robertson (and produced by “24” co-creator Joel Surnow), the show approaches satire from a conservative point of view. So far, two episodes have been filmed and the show’s future depends on the success of these first episodes.
Clips of the first episode have already popped up on the Internet, including one with a “President” Rush Limbaugh and “Vice President” Ann Coulter. VP Coulter warns viewers that, if they don’t watch Fox’s show, “We’ll invade your countries, kill your leaders, and convert you to Christianity.”
Surnow, who is politically conservative, told Yeas & Nays that he’s long wondered why conservative humor hasn’t found an audience on television.
“Most of the political satire really all comes from the left,” Surnow said, citing Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and “Saturday Night Live” as examples. “They’re all really brilliant and we’re huge fans ... but lots of people would like to see other targets get skewered.”
And any suggestion that liberals are just inherently funnier than conservatives is hogwash, says Surnow. “I think talent visits everybody,” he said. “People who are talented are just talented.”
Surnow says “The Half-Hour News Hour” will find its best comedy in political hysteria. “Barack Obama is a fine person but the hysteria that has created this guy as a presidential hopeful is funny to us,” he said.
Brian Montopoli, who edits CBS’ “Public Eye” media blog, says “it’s not impossible for conservatives to be funny.” But he finds it odd that the comedy show will be on a news channel and said that “the two clips I’ve seen so far just frankly aren’t very funny. ... They were so ideological that they almost cross over into unfunny and shrill.”
Surnow, however, is convinced he’s tapping into a ripe market. “There’s an audience out there with an appetite for this stuff,” he said. “And they’re hungry.”
New Web site wants politicians to pay up
Thursday marked the debut of AbsentCongress.org, a “nonpartisan, conservative student-led Web site addressing congressional accountability, eliminating government waste and supporting the American federally republican system of government.” (They must not see the inherent contradiction in “nonpartisan, conservative student-led Web site.”)
Not only does the Web site plan on tracking the voting attendance records of all federal lawmakers, it also plans on sending them a monthly bill for their missed votes.
“For example, U.S. senators are paid $165,200 per year,” the Web site explains. “In the month of January, the Senate had 39 votes, and therefore each vote cost the American taxpayer $353 per senator. A member who missed three votes in January owes the American taxpayer $1,059.” Politicians will be asked to repay the Department of Treasury for missed work. Conversely, “Perfect Attendance” certificates will be sent to, well, the good little politicians.
Currently, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., “owes” the Department of Treasury the most ($7,060), followed by Sens. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii ($6,707), Kit Bond, R-Mo. ($3,530), Craig Thomas, R-Wyo. ($3,177), and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. ($3,177).
As for the Senate’s 2008 presidential wannabes (not already mentioned above), only Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., currently has a perfect record. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., owes $706, Joe Biden, D-Del., owes $2,824 and John McCain, R-Ariz., needs to pony up $706.
Givens gives in to Obama
The list of celebrities endorsing Sen. Barack Obama continues to grow and now the junior senator from Illinois can add one more: Robin Givens (the actress also known in some circles as “Mike Tyson’s ex-wife”).
In an interview with Yeas & Nays, Givens said she’s pulling for Obama in 2008.
“I’m a Barack kind of girl,” Givens said. “He’s like this breath of fresh air.” Givens is in town to promote the new MyNetworkTV drama “Saints and Sinners,” in which she plays a New York interior designer named Kelly Mitchell. It debuts on WDCA My20 on March 14.
Givens said she watched Obama’s announcement in Springfield this past weekend and was inspired. “I loved it when he said that we all have a job to do,” Givens said. “He brings it back to sort of the good ’ol days where we all have to take a little bit of responsibility for making the world a better place.”
Regardless of who wins (Givens also said she likes Sen. Hillary Clinton, too), Givens is eagerly awaiting the campaign. “No matter if you’re a Democrat or a Republican, you have this overall sense that everybody wants change,” Givens said. “And I like the sense that we’re all sort of humans together and wanting things to be better.”
Presidential wannabes duke it out online
How are the Web sites of the various presidential contenders faring? Alexa.com ranks Web sites based on their traffic and here’s how the various campaign Web sites fared, from most popular to least:
1. Barack Obama
2. Hillary Clinton
3. John Edwards
4. Dennis Kucinich
5. John McCain
6. Newt Gingrich
7. Mitt Romney
8. Rudy Giuliani
9. Tom Vilsack
10. Sam Brownback
11. Bill Richardson
12. Ron Paul
13. Joe Biden
14. Tom Tancredo
15. Duncan Hunter
16. Chris Dodd
17. Mike Huckabee
How important is Internet popularity? Very, says Howard Mortman of the online marketing company New Media Strategies. “Being on top of that list is a huge victory for Hillary and Barack,” Mortman says. “If people are looking for information and they’re seeing Hillary and Obama at the top, that’s what you want, that’s a success.”
D.C. requires one more doctor in the house
Pat Cleary, executive vice president at the National Association of Manufacturers, reports his organization and the American Medical Association were both having conferences at the J.W. Marriott on Tuesday night when he heard an example of bureaucracy run amok.
“Because there is a crowd of several hundred people,” Cleary wrote on his Shopfloor.org blog, “District of Columbia government regulations require that they have a paramedic (which they must pay for) on duty and on the premises. Never mind that this is a room of over 600 physicians, a paramedic is still required on the scene.
“Rules are rules, after all. Even when they don’t make any sense. Somebody call a doctor.”



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate