Secretary’s wife puts paint to canvas for holiday card
Although many government holiday cards are simply tired, staid affairs (Formula: smiling politician + doting family + optional dog + ugly holiday sweater = Voila!), the Department of Veteran Affairs took a much more creative — and personal — approach this year.
The VA’s official card, pictured here, features a watercolor of The Soldiers Home Chapel in Dayton, Ohio, the first permanent chapel ever constructed by the U.S. government. And the card was painted by none other than Suzanne Nicholson, wife of Veteran Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson. Cards were sent to President Bush, cabinet members, congressmen, senators, and veterans groups and hospitals across the county.
This has become something of an annual affair for Mrs. Nicholson. She made similar efforts when her husband was chairman of the Republican National Committee from 1997-2000, as well as when he was the U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican from 2001-2005. Mayor Anthony Williams has even turned one of her oil paintings of a strip of buildings on Martin Luther King Boulevard into his own Christmas card.
“When Jim was asked to do this job at the VA,” she said, she found there were lots of interesting buildings within the VA system “with not only architectural, but historical significance. It seemed like a great idea.”
Nicholson shows her paintings at Foxhall Gallery in Upper Northwest and has exhibited at the American Academy in Rome.
Emanuel spares no one in his Anglo-Saxonisms
Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., the architect of the Democrats’ House takeover and the party’s new golden boy, doesn’t censor his language for anyone, according to a profile of the famously foul-mouthed pol in the current issue of GQ.
“Everybody is a [bleeping] idiot to Rahm,” James Carville tells writer Ryan Lizza.
Emanuel often leaves phone messages along the lines of “Hey, [cheese]head, call me back.”
British Prime Minister Tony Blair wasn’t spared. In 1998, before his first White House meeting with President Clinton, Emanuel, then a Clinton adviser, told Blair, “This is important. Don’t [mess] it up.”
Even Clinton tells Lizza the “bluntest” thing Emanuel ever said to him is “unprintable.”
In the closing days of the campaign, he screamed “Your mother!” to New York Times reporter Adam Nagourney over the phone.
But in the end, it was all worth it. When Democrats had won enough seats to take back the House on election night, Emanuel stood on a chair and yelled that Republicans could, well, perform the same act that Vice President Dick Cheney once suggested to Sen. Patrick Leahy.
Smoke ’em if you got ’em
Last week, Yeas & Nays told you about how cigar-chomping and cigarette-smoking Washingtonians will be savoring their last puffs at their favorite watering holes on New Year’s Eve, before the city goes smoke-free.
Well, it turns out the Jefferson Hotel may have all the other bars beat with its “smoke-out” celebration. The $200-per-person bash features an eight-course menu in the hotel’s stately old restaurant that will be interrupted three times by “intermissions” for butt breaks in the lounge (smoking in the dining room is already verboten). The nico-freaks will also get champagne, a cognac tasting, a commemorative cigar cutter and “cigar, hookah and cigarette” sessions all night long.
Couples can add on a deluxe room for $649 a night. We assume they can smoke in bed as well.
Take a look at your New Year’s plans
Everyone stresses out about New Year’s Eve: What to do, where to go and whom to smooch when the ball drops. Here to help is D.C. Compass (www.dccompass.com), a new Web site that uses video clips to “be your guide to the best of what’s going on in and around the Nation’s Capital City.” The site was founded by C-SPAN’s Garrette Moore and features ExecutiveBiz’s Pamela Sorensen as the host.
Conveniently enough, they’ve posted clips filmed at seven New Year’s Eve hot spots in the District: Blue Duck, Fly, Matchbox, IndeBleu, the Mandarin Oriental Hotel, Hank’s Oyster Bar and Nage.
In the clips, hosts and chefs tell you their specific plans for the evening.
None, however, were kind enough to offer hangover cures for the next day.
Fleischer no fan of the Burgundy and Gold
Rumors had been swirling in New York recently that former Bush press flack Ari Fleischer would challenge newly elected Rep. John Hall, D-N.Y., for Congress next year.
But Fleischer put those rumors to rest in a “Shermanesque” e-mail to the New York Observer that took a gratuitous shot at the Redskins.
“I do want you to know that I am NOT running,” wrote Fleischer to the paper’s Josh Benson. “Now that I have children, I would never do anything that could risk making them into Redskin fans.”
Think tank
“What will the headline be after the Democrats’ first 100 hours?”
“Dems Pass Continuing Resolution Extending 100 Hours till June.” – Patrick Cleary, National Association of Manufacturers
“Democrats Pass First Six Priorities; Now Comes the Hard Part.” – Norm Ornstein, American Enterprise Institute
“Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.” (The more that changes, the more it’s the same thing) – Bill Press, The Bill Press Show, AM 1260



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate