CHANGE MY LOCATION
Business
Examiners
Business Examiner
Most Recent Post
N.Y. judge blocks Wells Fargo deal for Wachovia, orders hearing
Internet Business Examiner
Most Recent Post
If it can happen to Apple, it can happen to you
California News
Multimedia News
More solar-powered parking meters coming to Baltimore
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
)
A parking kiosk near Broadway Market in Fells Point accepts cash, coin and credit cards for payment.
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - More high-tech parking meters are coming to Baltimore city.
“It’s a win-win for everyone,” said Peter Collier, chief operating officer of the Baltimore City Parking Authority.
More than 400 of the solar-powered high-tech meters will roll out in the city during the coming months, offering drivers the option of paying with coins, credit cards or bank debit cards.
Collier said with growth throughout the area bringing more people to Baltimore, “the last thing we need is a parking problem.”
While Collier said the meters are not a revenue-making scheme by the city, drivers are more likely to comply with parking regulations when they don’t have to hunt for change to feed the old-fashioned meters.
And, instead of losing money by overfeeding parking meters, drivers can take their purchased time with them for use in other parking spaces without individual meters, he said.
The technology for the machines comes from E-Z Park, a Clearwater, Fla.-based company that contracts with the city to provide the machines and technology.
An internal alarm on each E-Z Park box notifies the company charged with installation and maintenance in Baltimore, Cale Parking Systems USA Inc., of any problems and a local technical team is sent out in response.
E-Z Park chief executive George Levey said Baltimore City workers are moving ahead with plans to pull the old meters and install the new systems throughout the city.
“If the ground is prepared, we put in easily 100 meters a month, and that would cover about 1,000 spaces,” Levey said.
Seventy meters are in use in Fells Point and Mount Vernon and along Charles Street.
But Barbara Cromwell, program coordinator for the Preservation Society, doesn’t like the meters. She wasn’t fond of the old ones, either.
“Personally, I don’t like them,” Cromwell said. “Parking was free about two years ago. And even though you had to look for parking when you came down here, nowadays you have to look for quarters or have a credit card — and look for parking.”
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:23 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 19, 2008 re: "Council to look into van-accessible parking"
Report as inappropriate
10:39 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008
re: "Meters don't make the grade"
Report as inappropriate
9:07 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008
re: "Meters don't make the grade"
Report as inappropriate
1:12 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008
re: "Meters don't make the grade"
Report as inappropriate
11:30 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008
re: "Meters don't make the grade"
Report as inappropriate
8:57 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008
re: "Meters don't make the grade"
Report as inappropriate
8:55 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008
re: "Meters don't make the grade"
Report as inappropriate
2:32 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "More solar-powered parking meters coming to Baltimore"
Report as inappropriate
1:20 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008
re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"
Report as inappropriate
11:15 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008
re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"
Report as inappropriate
10:01 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008
re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"
Report as inappropriate
12:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007
re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"
Report as inappropriate
9:33 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007
re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"
Report as inappropriate
7:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007
re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"
Report as inappropriate
4:45 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007
re: "New ticket device puts illegal parkers on camera"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader Sam Burrello said:
My wife is disabled and we do drive a van but not wheel chair adapted. Only a fraction of hadicap people have these vans and if not allowed to park in van accessable sites we would have to pass these spaces and walk a great distance. The spaces would be empty if not allowed by car and non adapted vans
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jimmy said:
More things in in the United States need to be free, like medical care and housing, along with public transportation and parking. How to pay for it all, just ramp up our production and tax the wealthy down to a level thats sensible a income and relaunch the tax money in impact areas like education and research. The people can do it, but not with the team we have now in place, like people in charge like Nancy Polosi and her friends, these people and their ideas are the problem.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
what ever happened to free parking?
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What are the Burlingame citizens complaining about? Parking lot on Park ave. $1.00 for 10 hours...come to SF.......
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carl said:
Come to San Francisco. Most of the meters have a time limit displayed behind scratched plastic you can't read. Guaranteed city govt here wont fix it. Not a major problem to spend city dollars on...unless of course you can't read the time limit display and get a ticket. Oh well. They don't care so why should I. I NEVER shop in San Francisco. Parking Parking Parking. I do ALL my shopping out of San Francisco. I shop at Kmart and eat at Apple Bees in Redwood City every weekend. Try it. You'll like it. Friendlier workers, no parking issues, better prices, no crowd rush, and yes the wonderful smart parking meters. Gotta love it. "Anywhere But San Francisco"
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I love your writing style.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
GREAT JOB KEEP up the awesome work
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
On two separate occassions the meters did not work. The first time it took my money and did not deliver a receipt. The second time it took some of my money, spit out some and did not register some, but kept it. On the first occassion the authority said they would refund my money, but it has been over a month and I have received nothing. I'm waiting for a response to the second incident but not holding my breath
251 agree | 214 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects." WRONG--this measure will reduce the cost of apartments by $50,000-$80,000. That's a big chunk of change, especially for the poor, and above all for those who can't afford cars in the first place. Why should the government FORCE you to buy a parking space when you don't want one? All this rule is give you FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
184 agree | 196 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Right on Tom, poor people don't drive so why not take away their parking. You progressives give me the creeps. The minimum is ONE parking space for every FOUR units of housing and you want to take that away. Tom, you and Peskin need to Get A LIFE! I bet that Mr. Peskin has at least 2 parking spaces in his million dollar condo in Nothe Beach. Leave us alone!!!
198 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects. It makes a hard life still harder. Sad.
188 agree | 217 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I have been in Baltimore for the last 5 years. I have a disability, because of which my lower limbs are paralyzed. Recently, I have found a spurt in disability tags for parking in the last couple of years. I surveyed 7 vehicles on Redwood street, and found five had disabled tag!!! I have found that some young people in early 20s park their vehicle and walk 5 blocks without any trouble, and I on a wheelchair is unable to get a parking place. Sometimes it has been frustrating. The cops cannot do anything, as long as these disability tags certified indiscriminately by family physicians. Unfortunately, carrying a "illegal" disabled tags no longer is a social stigma. It has become as acceptable as illegal license. I hope, this letter brings some sense of morality and social responsibility to those people using disabled tags. They should understand the hardship they are causing to the disabled community. Regards, Jeremy
343 agree | 366 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
kilteddude said:
Does this mean they will stop ticketing legally parked cars? I've got 2 tickets in the last year while parked legally.
351 agree | 333 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
DAMN IT!
361 agree | 348 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ticket Amnesty said:
Ticket fines in Baltimore are absurd....so, don't pay them. Request and officer when you go to court for your ticket+fines and if he/she doesn't show (they rarely, if ever will) you only have to pay the fine + court costs....goodbye $800 fine on $21 ticket.
644 agree | 371 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree